> > Looking over the 12+ numbers for "105.5 The Fan" for the
> > spring book shows abysmal ratings while the new oldies
> > station on AM scores pretty good for a daytimer. While I
> > think it made sense to do something different at 105.5 in
> > order to bill better but sports talk is obviously not the
> > answer. Maybe they just put oldies on again until they can
>
> > come up a plan for this still pretty good signal. The
> 105.5
> > signal can not be more profitable under this current
> format
> > I mean what idiot thought sports talk would be better than
>
> > oldies.
> >
>
> Obviously, I'm very surprised that the new Oldies 1500 WAYS
> did as well as it did. Not good enough to finish in the
> upper echelon, but not totally bad. On the other hand, the
> only reason that "The Fan" is broadcasting on the FM dial,
> IMHO, is that sports fans in middle Georgia apparently grew
> tired of listening to a station that was forced to sign off
> at sundown, per FCC rules regarding AM daytimers like WAYS
> (formerly WWFN). I've listened to 105.5 during my visits to
> the mid-state, and it seems that listening to ESPN Radio in
> crystal clear FM is a much different experience than trying
> to listen to it in scratchy AM mono.
> Then again, sports stations have almost always struggled in
> the 12+ ratings, usually finishing at or near the bottom of
> the book.
>
Geez, guys... it's only one book, and The Fan didn't debut on 105.5 until four weeks in to the ARB... give it a chance! Nobody's expecting a 10 share, even from the 18-34 Monday Morning Quarterback demo. Y'know, it's not ALWAYS about the ratings... sometimes revenue opportunities present themselves in places where ratings fear to tread.
Besides, except for Allaccess, the publisher of R&R and the radio geeks on this board, who gives a flip about 12+ numbers anyway?!?
Stay tuned.
The PD of The Fan... David Nolin
TDO