• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

CW-6?

D

desertv

Guest
So when will WB-6 become CW-6? And when do the name change promos start? And could there be a call letters change? (KASW to KACW-"Arizona's CW") And the most important question...

What becomes of "The Desert Frog"? ???
 
You know I never understood why that station promoted themselves as Channel six since officially they are Channel Sixty-One. They are only Channel Six if you have cable. Doesn't it make more sense to promote themselves like Channel 45, Cable 9?
 
It's common for UHF stations to use their cable channel instead of their UHF channel...using the UHF #s makes the station sound rinky-dink I guess
 
desertv said:
It's common for UHF stations to use their cable channel instead of their UHF channel...using the UHF #s makes the station sound rinky-dink I guess

I've seen VHF stations that give their cable channel along with their OTA channel as well.

When the majority of your viewership gets cable through one provider, I guess that would make sense. In Phoenix, I think that most English-speaking households have cable, and the overwhelming majority of them get their cable service through Cox. Qwest, the biggest competitor, seems to match Cox's cable positioning of the local full-service stations. Eg., when Cox changed KUTP from channel 16 to channel 9, Qwest followed.

Myself, I think it would have been better to brand as WB61, cable 6, or now CW61, cable 6. Although with KASW having to give up their analog channel 61 in favor of DTV channel 49, I wonder if they were trying to de-emphasize the "61" brand. (As it turns out, it wouldn't have made a difference, since KASW will still map to channel 61, even after DTV conversion.)

With the advent of virtual channels in the DTV world, I wonder if KASW asks the FCC to let them map to channel 6 for OTA DTV service as well? All channels up to 99 are available for mapping and Tribune Media has already requested channel 75.
 
dhett said:
With the advent of virtual channels in the DTV world, I wonder if KASW asks the FCC to let them map to channel 6 for OTA DTV service as well? All channels up to 99 are available for mapping and Tribune Media has already requested channel 75.

Problem is, KUAT Tucson could cause problems with digital tuners if they and KASW were both mapped to Channel 6. KUAT is viewable in some parts of the southeast valley. I think the FCC requires that they map to their analog channel regardless of what their digital channel is.
 
KeithE4 said:
Problem is, KUAT Tucson could cause problems with digital tuners if they and KASW were both mapped to Channel 6. KUAT is viewable in some parts of the southeast valley. I think the FCC requires that they map to their analog channel regardless of what their digital channel is.

Of course. The whole area between Queen Creek, Sacaton and Picacho falls within both stations' predicted coverage. And yes, sometimes I can pull in KUAT in Chandler.

Duh, Dave.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom