Re: OS/2
Hello:
What was the problem with OS/2? EVERY genius in the world that I knew swore by it, while I was busy playing with my own copy of Windows. What was the difference between the two? Can someone enlighten me?
Thanks!
> > > > Actually.. First usable windows was 2.0 (Sam?)...
> > >
> > > Windows 1.0
> > >
> > >
http://www.fortunecity.com/marina/reach/435/win1fb.jpg
> > >
> > >
http://www.fortunecity.com/marina/reach/435/windows.htm#
>
> > >
> >
> > Right.. But.. Like I said, the first usable one iow the
> > first to actually be worth having on your computer was 2.0
>
>
>
> Sorry, not meaning to take this off topic but.........
>
> Granted, if you were part of the 99% of people that would
> rather run their nails over a chalkboard rather than learn
> and use DOS, Windows 1.0 was a welcome.
>
> Pluses: Was not DOS, easier and graphical to use compared to
> DOS, included MS-DOS Executive, Calendar, Cardfile, Notepad,
> Terminal, Calculator, Clock, Reversi, Control Panel, PIF
> (Program Information File) Editor, Print Spooler, Clipboard,
> RAMDrive, Windows Write, Windows Paint (AKA not available in
> DOS)
>
> Minuses: Very few applications written for it, did not use
> overlapping "windows" as we know it today.
>
> It comes down to a matter of preference. Some find
> Terrestrial radio actually worth having. Others do not
> believe that and think Satellite raido with commercial free,
> a plethora of channels and scrolling displays of song/artist
> are more "usable".
>
> Now if IBM OS/2 had taken off.........
>
<P ID="signature">______________
Rob Austin
Vice President
JamTraxx Media Inc.
http://www.jamtraxxmedia.com
"Major Market Solutions for Your Radio Station's Needs!"</P>