Atlanta/Re: Dan Bowen is out as PD at Star 94
Uriah said:
Kabrich said:
Could mean that he sees the GM finalist as a continuation of Sales running the place instead of a healthy balance and feels he needs to get out
This legend that Star's sales department runs the station is almost comical. Programming was still getting bonuses while the ratings were tanking (demo rank versus rating). Yes, the sales department is a driving force in the station culture - it's a very hot, dynamic group that outperforms ratings year after year. In far too many circumstances programming and promotions would recycle the same old crap and sales would be the group reinventing and generating ideas to promote and sell.
Take any business any position - if you're in the same job for 10 years it becomes habit and comfortable. 10 years is essentially 2 years experience 5 times unless you have the desire to change and refresh your approach constantly and have a consistent in-flow of new ideas, energy and concepts.
Randy: as you know so well, at some point a PD is called on to be cold and heartless - blowing out a staff for example. Dan's a very nice man; maybe too nice for what's called for in this situation. JD has the track record and experience to make the necessary moves IF upper management will allow more than another cookie cutter, follow the numbers, Top 40 clone PD to take the reins.
I am very familar with that.
In a situation in Dallas, where people had to be changed, I was letting some of the inherited dead weight go. The head of the Company did not want to pay them even 2 weeks notice. His arguement was and I quote "why bother - we pay them 2 weeks notice and they bad mouth us anyway". I fought him and did it anyway.
I continued to see him take this mentality through various departures - always fighting him to do what was right.
Of course, it was clear my time would come just as everyone else's did - and in all fairness, if someone is in charge, they need to have people they feel comfortable with to make things work (even if you know that they will fail regardless of if they change out their entire staff - as it starts at the top). But when my time came, there was no one left to insist I was taken care of. No matter, I fought for what was right - and could sleep well at night knowing as such.
And I agree with you about comfort. I can name countless morning personalities that the worst thing to ever happen to them was to get a contract. To them, a contract meant "easy street".
For my early career I always thought a contract was a sign of success until one day about 20 years ago John Lander and I were discussing it - and he told me he had never had a contract. I was taken back as this clearly went against everything I thought I was working towards. I asked him why not. He said, "well, a contract limits me. I am tied down to the station. If I am performing, I know that they would be stupid to get rid of me - and if they did, I could always get a job across the street. And without a contract, they have to treat me right. If I had a contract and was stuck there, they could treat me like crap".
I realized he was 100% correct and it was the last time I ever wanted a contract working in a station - and actually never did during my whole career. Would it have paid out in the Dallas situation above? Yes. But overall, I still think it was more positive than negative. When KIIS tried to hire me in 1990 and the company knew I had no contract, they realized that I really could leave at any time leaving them in the lurch - so they had to be do things I wanted (like take care of employees in situations like I stated above). If I had a contract, I could not have looked out for the people I did, as they would have known my threats would have been a violation of a contract.