Tom Wells said:"We're going to ignore the method that works well and sell something that works poorly because we can."
The manufacturers must be so proud.
All products should be so poorly made.
Where are they made? That should tell you something.
Tom Wells said:"We're going to ignore the method that works well and sell something that works poorly because we can."
The manufacturers must be so proud.
All products should be so poorly made.
TheBigA said:Where are they made? That should tell you something.
Tom Wells said:Why is it that radios that are built into, and "contained as part of something else" are such poor performers?
So just why is stupidity in radios permitted? It's just OK to sell radios to people that are essentially broken when new?
DavidEduardo said:Tom Wells said:Why is it that radios that are built into, and "contained as part of something else" are such poor performers?
It's because "performance" costs more money... maybe a few cents more, maybe a dime, or a quarter. But when you sell based on bid to WalMart or Target or CVS or such, every cent you shave from the cost enhances the chance to win a bid. And if you determine that nobody cares how an AM radio section sounds, you do it really cheap. Or if you determine that nobody cares if the even is an AM section, then you don't even add the AM section.
So just why is stupidity in radios permitted? It's just OK to sell radios to people that are essentially broken when new?
It saves money, and if you make the right profit and the retail chain does not complain or demand anything more, then the discussion is over.
Tom Wells said:I DEMAND lower Quality!
Tom Wells said:Fantstic! I can't wait for the same economics to hit food.
Quality programming too.KyDXIn said:The AM radio industry need to focus on one quality product, instead of butchering up the signal and having all the parts sounding horrible. Now this leader wants radio with pictures? He's about 60 years too late! It's called television! AM stereo is the answer.