Feedback is what I wanted and feedback is what I am getting!

So...let's break it down!
Kyle D said:
Here's some feedback.
If "Dance" was a viable format, someone would be doing it.
If no one had done it in the past, then you would probably have a valid point here. But you DID have WIQO (Q102) as a rhythmic station back in the 90's and was very popular at that. The other fact that you have two non-comm stations in the region doing current based rhythmic dance formats show that there is a following. In those areas the audience is there. I'm sure if they had bigger signals they could even attract MORE listeners (we had a similar problem in NYC with WDRE - Party 105 in Long Island..excellent station, class "A" signal.) There is also a question of awareness and that is something we're working on and hopefully someone locally can take it that step further.
Bill_W said:
How is pulse 87 even a radio station? What do you see when you turn on your TV in NYC to analog channel 6? Is it in stereo on a radio? Is it softer than all the other radio stations? I guess we have an 87.7 here in Philly for another year, 6ABC but, it is much softer and in mono.
Yes, we know Pulse 87 is on channel 6 here. And it has been argued many times on the NYRMB (New York Radio Message Board) by radio enthusiasts regarding how one can't really classify Pulse as a radio station since by FCC standards, it is licensed as a TV station. There is a REASON why I bring up radio enthusiasts versus fans of the music who could give two boots on whether or not a radio station is a TV station. As far as they are concerned, they are hearing music on the radio and like what they are getting. Plus if Mega Media (the company that owns Pulse) turns up a profit..perhaps in time should radio corporations decide to bail and sell off their frequencies, that they could get a better dial position above 92.
DToTheJ said:
Agreed! Despite the popular opinion, Philly does not need a "danz stashun".
I'm kinda surprised you are saying this since you have been following the arguments regarding Pulse. Well, we're trying to test the waters to see whether or not the dance music fans in Philly would open up to a current based format. And if things are positive, then we're going to venture into making noise and doing something about it.
George Brusstar said:
"Targeting Philadelphia and Boston" for your "campaign"?
Are you a PAC? Do you file with the FEC?
I don't doubt there is a handful of, perhaps even a few thousand people out there who would enjoy a "dance" station ("Dance" isn't a "format", of course). There are even more who would like Standards, Actual Oldies(SM), Classical, the Big Bands, Traditional Jazz, Country (in the case of New York), Classic Country, Beautiful Music, '80s-Hair-Metal, Celtic-Hits-of-the-'60s, etc. Being a "mass medium" at least for the time being, terrestrial radio I don't think has a reason to take programming advice from your "coalition". I'm not trying to be rude or a smartass, but you said you "needed feedback".
I think two lesser-powered non-comms on the outskirts of Philly (and in Wilmington's case, a high school station outside the market altogether)-- and for a small part of NY, misuse of low-power TV audio that isn't even part of the FM broadcast band-- pretty much accurately represent the "need" for "Dance Radio" relative to other formatic desires.
But what I really don't understand is why "radio"? With the Internet there is now an infinite amount of potential to do just about anything, provided the issue of performance royalties gets resolved in the near future. If "dance" is the future, then why bother with terrestrial radio?
No PAC, No FEC. Sorry, I'm not Obama.
Okay...let me stand corrected on the format term....."Rhythmic". But anyway you name it, it is still "Dance Music". And no, I DO want opinions so I'm not taking your comment or anyone else's as "smartass". And I am sure there are perhaps voids in the Philly market that need priority first over dance. That's what I am trying to find out. But whether or not you want to talk specific markets near your region...the fact of the matter is, the people that tune in to the dance stations on those outskirts ARE the same people that can easily tune in to the Philadelphia market stations.
Sure, the future WILL be Internet streaming stations. As long as long range Wi-Fi gets perfected, I can see Live 365 come out with their own car stereo whereas you can bring in the streams that you want. But until then, terrestrial radio STILL holds a purpose. It will ALWAYS be a part of mass media. And perhaps with a rhythmic station, (and I can say this because it is happening here), people will RETURN to radio whereas of late they have abandoned it since corporate ruined the soundscape as the majority of stations sound "cookie cutter" with "safe" formats.
That's why I am investigating Philadelphia for this. I WANT to also hear from fans of dance music in Philly with their response as well.