• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Dangerous Dick and Skibba

C

clericus

Guest
So I've been listening.

Is this a good show? I can't tell. Is this an improvement over Hendrie? I can't see how it is.

Hendrie is brilliant. I don't think brilliant quite describes these two. Occasionally amusing perhaps. Raunchy, but not brilliant.

What am I missing?

Clericus
 
>
> What am I missing?
>
> Clericus
>

Nothing. That is what the show offers. Can't type much else, Ted Bell is bringing my foil-wrapped potato and great steak so gotta eat. "Hey Ted, take this coupon?"<P ID="signature">______________
+--
Chris
SDRadio.net</P>
 
Who? What station?

> So I've been listening.
>
> Is this a good show? I can't tell. Is this an improvement
> over Hendrie? I can't see how it is.
>
> Hendrie is brilliant. I don't think brilliant quite
> describes these two. Occasionally amusing perhaps. Raunchy,
> but not brilliant.
>
> What am I missing?
>
> Clericus
>
 
So, I've also been listening. I don't hate these guys but I can't say I like them. I have yet to laugh out loud. Something that was guaranteed to happen listening to Phil, even for just a quarter hour.

Phil's a tough act to follow. The only justification for this move I can buy is that, for whatever reason, the station no longer has clearance to run The Phil Hendrie Show. What else would explain such a peculiar decision?

What the DD&S show has made clear to me, once and for all, is that the exhausting use of gratuitous drop in's only makes a weak presentation even more disturbing.



> So I've been listening.
>
> Is this a good show? I can't tell. Is this an improvement
> over Hendrie? I can't see how it is.
>
> Hendrie is brilliant. I don't think brilliant quite
> describes these two. Occasionally amusing perhaps. Raunchy,
> but not brilliant.
>
> What am I missing?
>
> Clericus
>
<P ID="signature">______________
nxqtld.gif
</P>
 
103.7 Free FM

Evening shift (7-10P)

I think Hendrie has been bumped to 10PM

I'm glad to hear a local show and I'm always glad to hear new air talent. I hope they do well, but I think Leykis has the misogenist schtick pretty well covered.

clericus

> Who? What station?
>
> > So I've been listening.
> >
> > Is this a good show? I can't tell. Is this an improvement
> > over Hendrie? I can't see how it is.
> >
> > Hendrie is brilliant. I don't think brilliant quite
> > describes these two. Occasionally amusing perhaps.
> Raunchy,
> > but not brilliant.
> >
> > What am I missing?
> >
> > Clericus
> >
>
 
From a quick listen they are soooo unfunny and soooo boring. A real morning team sounding like schtick.

Of course the best part is that you know that 103.7 is being remotely managed is when on their website Phil Hendrie is still be advertised in the 7-10 spot. Is anyone home over there?


> So I've been listening.
>
> Is this a good show? I can't tell. Is this an improvement
> over Hendrie? I can't see how it is.
>
> Hendrie is brilliant. I don't think brilliant quite
> describes these two. Occasionally amusing perhaps. Raunchy,
> but not brilliant.
>
> What am I missing?
>
> Clericus
>
 
Every night's topic: sex.

Ain't going to work. Talking about radio would be more interesting...I think.



> So I've been listening.
>
> Is this a good show? I can't tell. Is this an improvement
> over Hendrie? I can't see how it is.
>
> Hendrie is brilliant. I don't think brilliant quite
> describes these two. Occasionally amusing perhaps. Raunchy,
> but not brilliant.
>
> What am I missing?
>
> Clericus
> <P ID="signature">______________
Stuff ignored by the newspapers found at
http://www.sandiegoradionews.com/
</P>
 
TOnight's topic: getting hopefully drunk, asking your parents to pick you up when you are blithering drunk, and smoking marijuana "with your green bong."

> Every night's topic: sex.
>
> Ain't going to work. Talking about radio would be more
> interesting...I think.
>
>
>
> > So I've been listening.
> >
> > Is this a good show? I can't tell. Is this an improvement
> > over Hendrie? I can't see how it is.
> >
> > Hendrie is brilliant. I don't think brilliant quite
> > describes these two. Occasionally amusing perhaps.
> Raunchy,
> > but not brilliant.
> >
> > What am I missing?
> >
> > Clericus
> >
>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom