I'm really not here to argue opinions, I simply posted some factual information that I felt could help illuminate a situation called into question.
If you do indeed have the physical Arbitron books as you claim, then perhaps you can tell me what WMYU posted in persons 12+ in the Spring '93 survey.... good thing I have a copy of that book, otherwise I'd be waiting a while.
I have no agenda here, I am simply a person who has observed the Knoxville market for many, many years, and has every single Arbitron survey since they started measuring Knoxville radio in the spring of 1970.
By the way, in that survey, WIVK-A/F had a 20.3 for first, then WNOX with a 16.7 for second, and WATE with a 13.5 for third. That was 12+. In teens, WNOX had a 39.2 and WKGN had a 33.8. Once again, just posting some facts for my friends on the ET board, that's all.
> I've got the actual Arbitron books, would you like me to
> send you photocopies?
>>If that is a fact, then why don't your numbers reflect the truth.
>>I've got the physical books sitting right here, wanna come over and take a gander?
If you do indeed have the physical Arbitron books as you claim, then perhaps you can tell me what WMYU posted in persons 12+ in the Spring '93 survey.... good thing I have a copy of that book, otherwise I'd be waiting a while.
I have no agenda here, I am simply a person who has observed the Knoxville market for many, many years, and has every single Arbitron survey since they started measuring Knoxville radio in the spring of 1970.
By the way, in that survey, WIVK-A/F had a 20.3 for first, then WNOX with a 16.7 for second, and WATE with a 13.5 for third. That was 12+. In teens, WNOX had a 39.2 and WKGN had a 33.8. Once again, just posting some facts for my friends on the ET board, that's all.
> I've got the actual Arbitron books, would you like me to
> send you photocopies?
>>If that is a fact, then why don't your numbers reflect the truth.
>>I've got the physical books sitting right here, wanna come over and take a gander?