> The commentary on this on other radio boards seems to run
> along two different lines of thinking regarding the Dick
> Clark appearance. 1) Those who have been personally
> effected, or have a family member effected, by a major
> health tragedy applaud Dick Clark. 2) Others were unaware
> of his condition, were shocked by what they saw and heard
> and thought perhaps Dick Clark and ABC could have handled
> things differently.
>
> The public was not prepared for what they saw and heard. I
> personally applaud Dick Clark for putting forth what had to
> be a monumental effort to get himself prepared for the
> broadcast. The stroke was obviously much more debilitating
> than most of us were aware. However, in the few minutes I
> watched, I found it more painful than invigorating. A
> struggle for him and his audience. Rather than finding his
> appearance motivating, I felt pity for Dick Clark. I don't
> think that is what he or ABC had in mind, but I believe it
> is the way many Americans felt.
>
> I would have much rather seen Dick Clark and ABC present a
> documentary on the struggles of stroke rehabilitation at a
> more appropriate time instead of having him appear in the
> traditional new years eve setting.
>
> Best wishes to all.
You all bring up good points.
Maybe he should have rested another year, but perhaps he was worried that ABC would quickly hand over the position to Ryan Seacrest. Ugh.
I'm sure Mr. Clark will good better and better. Obviously Peter George knows what he is going through, but we have to remember that he is much older.
> > All very noble thoughts, but I think I'm leaning toward
> > agreeing with gr8oldies.
> > If he (unfortunately) doesn't improve much but continues
> > doing appearances, his legacy may become tainted (right or
>
> > wrong as that may be).
> >
> > It's not like he needs the airtime, the money or
> > recognition- if he never worked another day, he's way
> beyond
> > rich and is perhaps THE most influential radio personality
>
> > ever.
> >
> > Other than sheer pride, what would be the point?
> >
> > >
> > > I disagree. He's still alive, and he showed vital
> > > determination in making an appearance. He knows people
> > will
> > > always remember him for the youthful image he had for
> many
> >
> > > decades until last year, but he's not living in the
> past.
> >
> > >
> > > People will also now have an additional memory of him as
> a
> >
> > > courageous survivor making a triumphant return against
> the
> >
> > > odds of a debilitating condition, and I'd think he would
>
> > > hope that many of his longtime fans, also aging and
> > possibly
> > > facing various physical challenges, would find his
> > > appearance inspiring.
> > >
> >
>