D
D. R. Tucker
Guest
Although I consider myself a Howie Carr fan, I can’t help wondering if the real reason he wanted to bolt WRKO had to do with his inability to prevent the station from bringing Tom Finneran on board.
I suspect that Howie really wanted some sort of veto power over the decision to make Finneran the AM drive host; obviously, Howie thinks that making Finneran the morning host was a disastrous decision, and I assume he felt frustrated that, after all the years he spent making money for “Boston’s Talk Station,” he still didn’t have enough behind-the-scenes pull to prevent Entercom management from making Finneran a part of the ‘RKO team.
Does anybody doubt that Carr went to Entercom management and warned them that it would be a mistake to put Finneran in AM drive? And does anybody doubt that Entercom’s execs were so convinced of Finneran’s main-event potential as a host that they politely dismissed Carr’s criticisms?
I take no position on whether it would be proper to have a host, even one as popular and lucrative as Carr, having veto power over such decisions. However, I think it’s evident that Howie wanted Entercom management to walk his way, so to speak—and when Entercom decided not to listen to him, he decided to hit the road (and made a few legal mistakes in doing so, according to the courts).
If Howie had his way, Finneran would not be the morning host. Is this really the core of this dispute—that Entercom management “dissed” him when it came to the decision to bring Finneran in?
I suspect that Howie really wanted some sort of veto power over the decision to make Finneran the AM drive host; obviously, Howie thinks that making Finneran the morning host was a disastrous decision, and I assume he felt frustrated that, after all the years he spent making money for “Boston’s Talk Station,” he still didn’t have enough behind-the-scenes pull to prevent Entercom management from making Finneran a part of the ‘RKO team.
Does anybody doubt that Carr went to Entercom management and warned them that it would be a mistake to put Finneran in AM drive? And does anybody doubt that Entercom’s execs were so convinced of Finneran’s main-event potential as a host that they politely dismissed Carr’s criticisms?
I take no position on whether it would be proper to have a host, even one as popular and lucrative as Carr, having veto power over such decisions. However, I think it’s evident that Howie wanted Entercom management to walk his way, so to speak—and when Entercom decided not to listen to him, he decided to hit the road (and made a few legal mistakes in doing so, according to the courts).
If Howie had his way, Finneran would not be the morning host. Is this really the core of this dispute—that Entercom management “dissed” him when it came to the decision to bring Finneran in?