imhomerjay said:If you already have cable or sattelite, or hooked up your handy box, why begrudge some folks a bit more opportunity to get ready themselves?
Scott Fybush said:landtuna said:Nate Wesley said:The early adopters don't have much to brag or complain about. For all of the 'screw them, I got my stuff set up on time'-attitudes, how's about lending some of that expertise to help those who could use it? Somehow I doubt your indignation goes that far.
I set up everyone in my family and countless other friends and neighbors and have responded to news articles providing complete conversion information. I know other techie folks who have done likewise. The help is out there for the asking.
Every station in my market has either run a phone bank or lent staff to our phone bank at the PBS station. We're about to do our second live call-in special with on-air demos (hosted by yours truly, among others) showing how to hook up the boxes, run a channel scan, connect a VCR, etc. Last time we did it, we had 15 phone lines going nonstop for several hours.
Our viewer services department has been collecting unneeded coupons from our members to distribute to those who need them, and we just got a small federal grant to do house calls for those unable to hook up their boxes on their own.
How true, how true...kenglish said:Just as a reminder:
The "Signal Strength" indicator, in Digital TV (8VSB), is primarily a "Signal Quality" indicator. It does not read signal power directly, but looks at how hard the equalizer is working (fixing the multipath), and uses that info, along with a look-up table, to see what level of signal-to-noise would have produced the same equalization.
So, it's a pseudo "Q" meter.
Unfortunately, many people think it's an indication that their broadcasters aren't supporting the Electric Company's stockholders enough ;D .
willcail said:051.1 WSFJ DT Trinity Broadcasting Network
Scott Fybush said:imhomerjay said:If you already have cable or sattelite, or hooked up your handy box, why begrudge some folks a bit more opportunity to get ready themselves?
Because whatever marginal benefit might be derived by keeping analog service available on a limited basis (and it will be limited, since many analog stations are already running on reduced power and some are already gone completely) is outweighed, and then some, by the problems a delay in the analog shutoff will cause.
Unhappy with the quality of digital signals where you are? You're not alone - and the reason for that, in many cases, is that stations are still operating on interim channels at low power while waiting to cut over on their existing analog channel, or using side-mounted DTV antennas because they can't yet remove the analog antenna that's mounted on the top of the tower where coverage is the best. Or they're on their final channel, but suffering from interference from analog signals on the same overcrowded spectrum.
All those tower crews whose schedules have been booked in a careful ballet to get all those antennas moved and final, full-power DTV signals on the air over the next few months? That schedule will be shot to you-know-where.
(And there are radio implications, too - a lot of noncommercial FMs are waiting to file applications to increase power and drop vertical-only restrictions - and they can't do that until all those analog stations on channel 6 go away.