• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

DKFNOLA/Dan Frazier---please respond

Mr. Frazier:

Thank you for responding to an earlier topic of mine. I salute you guys for offering your services to WWL to air the emergency recovery broadcast.

You all have been NO DOUBT NUMBER ONE in discussing recovery. Breaking that story about Nagin's idiot Meffert halting the 1st class communications network a couple of years ago that would have served us well during Katrina (oh, by the way, did you see Couhig has been listening to you---as he got in that topic on tonight's nationally televised debate?) earned all the respect I can give you, which can't be quantified.


Just to comment on WWL refusing to take your offer. Now remember, I have been very critical of WWL on this board, but here's the way I see it.

Metairie suffered from Broussard's flood (although it could have been worse if a levee had broke). That means several businesses/restaurants/grocery stores were flooded. As I understand it, services were limited, and it would have taken some time to get water/power/sewer back up in Metairie. It wouldn't have been so wise to have so many broadcasters cramped into Metairie where services were very limited. I am not saying the WJBO location was so great (as many broadcasters like the wuss Gerry V complained about being cramped into a trailer/RV in the WJBO parking lot or having to sleep on the floor in the studio), but keep in mind, for these guys to get something to eat, they would have had to travel very far--and getting relief food takes a long time. I could see maybe sending a few WWL reporters to your studio to keep an eye on things on the east side of the river in Jefferson Parish. I know Dave Cohen spent a lot of time at the EOC in Marrero broadcasting from there.

Nevertheless, I am disappointed you all weren't included/invited to be part of the "United Radio" and I would have enjoyed listening to you. Although Eric was far away, I am sure that he would have made an effort to get back close to home to help out with the broadcast.


I also want to ask you something regarding Zephyrs afternoon broadcasts. Last year, the Zephyrs had an afternoon game on the West coast (Sacramento, I believe), and for some stupid reason I hear Tim Grubbs say that the game would be only on the internet because national radio hosts during day on your station have agreed to maximum number of times of being pre-empted. This was ridiculous, especially considering that unless I fly out to California to watch the game, I would have to get to the internet and stay in front of/near a computer for several hours. Last year, I thought it might have been the arrogant Sean Hannity who imposed this (since he was still on your station at the time). But then last week, for a home game against Memphis, the same thing happens again--but this time I see Neal Boortz would be pre-empted. The little moron was angry that just the last 30 minutes of his show would be cut off? I am sure Eric would have had the class to give up his show for the day for Zs.

I don't understand why Boortz and Hannity feel superior to being pre-empted. Yet Savage, who is by the far the best national show on your station, gets pre-empted all the time by Zs. And not just by Zs, by Tulane coaches shows and broadcasts as well.

I hope you will respond on the latter or both topics.

Thanks in advance.
 
Patriot,

Thank you for your comments regarding the station. Shane Warner, Eric Asher and the rest of the staff are doing a great job focusing on New Orleans future while entertaining listeners at the same time.

Your thoughts on why the offer of using the studio was not accepted are valid. That could have been the reason, although space wasn't really an issue, plenty of that in the building. Services were limited but the National Guard was staged right next door quickly so safety would not have been an issue.

Last years situation with the Zephyrs is correct. The first day game this season was my call. I felt (and still do) that with the election so close that listeners need all the information they can get- and the Zephyrs were very understanding about that so we went with Eric's show. Boortz is one of the best people I have met in radio- he isn't concerned about his 30 minutes so that's not an issue. There will be day games coming up in the future (Tuesday April 25th for sure) and the Zephyrs are such a great partner- a sports team with a soul, very refreshing if you ask me- that they understand our role regarding the city's future as well.
Thanks again Patriot...feel free to email me or the staff at the station- we respond to all listeners.

DanFrazier


> Mr. Frazier:
>
> Thank you for responding to an earlier topic of mine. I
> salute you guys for offering your services to WWL to air the
> emergency recovery broadcast.
>
> You all have been NO DOUBT NUMBER ONE in discussing
> recovery. Breaking that story about Nagin's idiot Meffert
> halting the 1st class communications network a couple of
> years ago that would have served us well during Katrina (oh,
> by the way, did you see Couhig has been listening to
> you---as he got in that topic on tonight's nationally
> televised debate?) earned all the respect I can give you,
> which can't be quantified.
>
>
> Just to comment on WWL refusing to take your offer. Now
> remember, I have been very critical of WWL on this board,
> but here's the way I see it.
>
> Metairie suffered from Broussard's flood (although it
> could have been worse if a levee had broke). That means
> several businesses/restaurants/grocery stores were flooded.
> As I understand it, services were limited, and it would have
> taken some time to get water/power/sewer back up in
> Metairie. It wouldn't have been so wise to have so many
> broadcasters cramped into Metairie where services were very
> limited. I am not saying the WJBO location was so great (as
> many broadcasters like the wuss Gerry V complained about
> being cramped into a trailer/RV in the WJBO parking lot or
> having to sleep on the floor in the studio), but keep in
> mind, for these guys to get something to eat, they would
> have had to travel very far--and getting relief food takes a
> long time. I could see maybe sending a few WWL reporters to
> your studio to keep an eye on things on the east side of the
> river in Jefferson Parish. I know Dave Cohen spent a lot of
> time at the EOC in Marrero broadcasting from there.
>
> Nevertheless, I am disappointed you all weren't
> included/invited to be part of the "United Radio" and I
> would have enjoyed listening to you. Although Eric was far
> away, I am sure that he would have made an effort to get
> back close to home to help out with the broadcast.
>
>
> I also want to ask you something regarding Zephyrs
> afternoon broadcasts. Last year, the Zephyrs had an
> afternoon game on the West coast (Sacramento, I believe),
> and for some stupid reason I hear Tim Grubbs say that the
> game would be only on the internet because national radio
> hosts during day on your station have agreed to maximum
> number of times of being pre-empted. This was ridiculous,
> especially considering that unless I fly out to California
> to watch the game, I would have to get to the internet and
> stay in front of/near a computer for several hours. Last
> year, I thought it might have been the arrogant Sean Hannity
> who imposed this (since he was still on your station at the
> time). But then last week, for a home game against Memphis,
> the same thing happens again--but this time I see Neal
> Boortz would be pre-empted. The little moron was angry that
> just the last 30 minutes of his show would be cut off? I am
> sure Eric would have had the class to give up his show for
> the day for Zs.
>
> I don't understand why Boortz and Hannity feel superior to
> being pre-empted. Yet Savage, who is by the far the best
> national show on your station, gets pre-empted all the time
> by Zs. And not just by Zs, by Tulane coaches shows and
> broadcasts as well.
>
> I hope you will respond on the latter or both topics.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
 
Re: WIST signal?

> we respond to all listeners.

Well then please accept my own compliments in your carriage of the Savage show. I enjoy his three hour kvetch-fest.

That is if I can hear it - I work between Jackson, MS and Baton Rouge. Would you mind sharing the progress/plans for returning to the big antenna array? Any thoughts on upgrading -- perhaps by moving the day or night signal to the Northshore via co-lo on Channel 54's site -- and blowing 50K south to NOLA? I know the Paris Road TV tower owners wouldn't mind getting rid of all their detuning stuff.

Just having some fun spending your money for you :) I wish you well and good luck.
 
Re: WIST signal?

> Any thoughts on
> upgrading -- perhaps by moving the day or night signal to
> the Northshore via co-lo on Channel 54's site -- and blowing
> 50K south to NOLA?

I know this isn't quite what you meant, but you might wanna check this out:

http://www.recnet.com/cdbs/fmq.php?facid=160395

Seems the owners of 690 have a plan to build a 250-watter in Mandeville.<P ID="signature">______________

<a target="_blank" href=http://www.thebigtymer.com>The BigTymer </a>
</P>
 
Re: WIST signal?

> I know this isn't quite what you meant...

Yep, was merely trying to generate a little interest in a halfwave multitower monster as exampled on http://www.fybush.com/sites/2006/site-060127.html.

> Seems the owners of 690 have a plan to build a 250-watter in Mandeville.

Hmmm, I see that. Unfortunately they seem to be one of many trying to fill in the hole created by the demise of Biloxi's 570. Should be interesting.

http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/amq?stat...&slat2=&NS=N&dlon2=&mlon2=&slon2=&EW=W&size=9
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom