• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Do Any CC Sound Engineers Listen to 99.7, the Fox?

  • Thread starter audiomusiclover
  • Start date

A

audiomusiclover

Guest
I have noticed over the last few weeks that 99.7, the Fox, has played an occasional song that sounded like a very low resolution mp3 (highly compressed). It has gotten worse as of late as they seem to play a low quality recording very frequently now. Does anyone look after that station with all of CC's footprint in this area? It is enough that the music is well worn and predictable, but they should at least try to keep their product quality high sound wise. After all, sound is what a station is. They clearly need to work on that station.... just my rant....
 
This is likely not an engineering issue, per se. Rather, it's bad discretion on the part of the music director. Since the Fox doesn't exactly have the market cornered on "deep cuts", I would peradventure that most any song that fits into their format (as they have defined it) would be commercially available or even easily obtainable through a service such as TM Century.

On a similar note, I've noticed that the Fox is playing an edited version of The Who's "Who Are You". The original album track contains the F-word in a couple of places. In 1978, MCA records issued this song to album rock stations on a promotional 12" single that was edited just enough to remove those words while sacrificing only a few seconds of the song. (On the 7" single, the group actually re-cut the vocal track in one place so that the lyric was "Who the (hell) are you" instead of the original "Who the f*** are you")

Now with the ability to edit audio digitally, the Fox has essentially attempted to re-create the 12" promotional version, edited just for AOR radio. Unfortunately (unless they've changed it since the last time I heard it), the editing was not only noticeable, but blatantly awful. Where the editor made the cut and splice, the beats didn't match up. It's off by almost a half a beat. I ripped the original track from a CD and made a similar edit myself using Cakewalk Music Creator 2002 on my laptop and I made sure mine was perfect before I saved it. Anyone out there need some editing done??? LOL
 
I hadn't thought about that, but you're probably right. And if that's the case, then that means whoever is selecting these poor quality song files and sloppy editing is likely affecting numerous classic rock stations in numerous markets.

This is sad for a couple of reasons. The person or people who are programming classic rock stations should be knowledgeable enough of the history of album rock radio to know better. And they should be passionate enough about the product they're delivering to make sure it's done with the highest quality possible.
 
Unfortunately, there is little time or incentive for quality control at the 'superclusters'. Most all employees wear multiple hats, and it's a struggle just to get it all done every day. Just another example of the cost of cutting costs.
 
nextline said:
Unfortunately, there is little time or incentive for quality control at the 'superclusters'.

Just another reason that the FCC needs to break up clear channel and any others. Quality of the sound is the most important thing a station can do to retain or lose listeners, IMHO.
 
It would not be an FCC decision - but one Congress would have to make. It was the TeleCommunications Act of 1996 that allowed the consolidation. It would take an act of Congress to break them up. So, talk to your Congressman!
 
I would think Virginia Foxx or Howard Coble would be better targets for the conversation, although there is little chance it would ever happen. I live in Mel's district, but find Mrs Foxx and Mr. Coble receptive to my calls.

What is more likely is that the bean counters become disillusioned with the radio business and start selling off the not-so profitable markets. (Oh, wait, that is already happening at CC).
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom