• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Does this happen in the US?

It does happen, but rarely. The US Federal government has no sense of humor about such things. Recently, a Low Power FM station was issued a Notice of Apparent Liability (a fine notice) for US $12,000 by the FCC. $7,000 was for operating a transmitter that was not certified and happened to interfere with the aircraft bands. $5,000 was for waiting 30 minutes to shut it off after being notified of the problem. I believe that agents from the FCC, FAA, Homeland Security and FEMA participated in the action against the station.

In the US, all LPFM transmitters must be type certified for the LPFM service. This means that the manufacturer has tested the equipment to determine that it does not produce spurious emissions. That data is then sent to the FCC which reviews the test data and issues a certification number that must be affixed to the transmitter. Any LPFM caught using a transmitter not bearing a certification number is likely to get a stiff fine. In the full powered service, transmitters are usually type verified, which is similar to certified, but the test data is only retained by the manufacturer. Presumably, the licensee also runs a proof of performance when the equipment is installed and certifies that no interference has resulted. Together, these requirements knock out 99.99% of the potential aircraft interference issues. When they do occur, they are usually quickly tracked down.
 
Lee Anderson said:
Interesting story. Does happen in the US?

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/aviation/pilots-complain-of-fm-stations-static/story-e6frg95x-1226354315803

RADIO stations are interfering with airline communications, as pilots complain of distorted music and chatter over the air traffic control frequency.
The Australian Communications and Media Authority has asked community-based FM radio stations to check they are not sending "spurious emissions" over the aeronautical band.

Interestingly enough, IIRC interference with aircraft communication is one reason given for adopting the BS412 edict (RMS levels must be held 12 dB below peaks) on FM broadcast in Europe.

Personally, I think it was simply an attempt by purists to reduce processing on loud rock stations, as I can't believe that properly operated, fully-modulated transmitters would create out of band components to a level to interfere with the adjacent aircraft band. But that's just me. ;)

Kind Regards,
David
 
Processing is, indeed, mostly irrelevant. There are three main causes of interference to aircraft radios:

1. Harmonics or mixing products from the transmitter. An FM transmitter can generate signals at twice or three times the operating frequency. This is normally filter out by harmonic filters built into the transmitter. Some older exciters do not have such filtering, relying on a filter later on in the transmitter. So if they are used for low power operation they can generate interference.

Mixing products can be generated at sights with more than one transmitter. Signal from one antenna is picked up by the antenna of another station, and is mixed in the final amplifier to produce a third signal. Also can be cured by external filters.

Some exciters, when they age, will also generate spurs up and down --and beyond, the FM band.
Usual culprit is dried out capacitors, especially in frequency synthesis circuits. A fail fan and too much heat can also be the culprit, especially in the various re-branded RVR exciters (Energy-Onix, Bext, etc.)

2. IF beat interference in the aircraft radio. The receiver has a broadly tuned amplifier that amplifies the incoming signal, then mixes it with a local oscillator to produce a third signal, the intermediate frequency. Tuned stages are then used to amplify the IF signal to a useable level. Most receivers use an intermediate frequency of 10.7 mHZ. When the plane (usually "general aviation"--think Piper Cub) flies near a radio station that is 10.7 MHZ below the aircraft band signal, the radio may pick up the radio station instead of the signal in the aircraft band.

3. De-sense. Many aircraft band signals are AM. The "front end" of these radios may be very broad. Again flying over the radio station--even, sometimes, an AM station, the radio's front end is overloaded and detects the radio station. Even if the station is not generating any harmonics, or mixing products that actually fall into the aircraft band.
 
Single-Conversion receivers..........
Salt Lake City's Farnsworth Peak is immediately adjacent to the flight-path at SLC International Airport. I've heard many reports of FM stations being heard on aircraft radio's, due to I.F. beat.

Also, I wonder about those "low-power", "Community Station" transmitters, and their amplifiers. How clean can some of them be?
(We've got a Pirate on 99.9 here, since about a month ago. I should go track it down, and look at it with an analyzer for fun).
 
When I was the Cheif E. of 4 stations in Tucson, we often got complaints from private pilots about interference from the FM's on Tucson Mt. The pro's rarely complained, because I guess they were used to looking outside and seeing how close the northerly approach was to that Mt. With about 4 ea 100 KW fm's on that hill at that time, front end overload was common. Some of the worst complaints came from my fellow Civil Air Patrol members who often had DF receivers as well as conventional Air band and FM communications gear in the birds. Try convincing a private pilot that his multi thousand dollar radio is at fauilt and not the FM's!
 
I remember flying into Tucson on commercial flights a number of times and passing just abeam of Tucson Mt. Usually almost close enough to count the cacti up there! Also you could almost make out the vehicles and see who was visiting their transmitter...

There were SIX class C FMs on the mountain when I was there. Not to mention three full-power analog TVs, one V and two U's.
 
There was a pirate in Miami that interfered with aircraft frequencies. It was shut down within a day, the fastest I ever heard the FCC shut down a pirate. If that pirate had only stayed within the FM band, it would still be on today.
 
Nick said:
There was a pirate in Miami that interfered with aircraft frequencies. It was shut down within a day, the fastest I ever heard the FCC shut down a pirate. If that pirate had only stayed within the FM band, it would still be on today.

That kind of thing must be common in Miami.

I was on an inbound AA flight from LAX about 10 years ago which did a rather disturbing landing abort when it was eastbound between the turnpike and the outer marker. The pilot explained that an illegal FM was interfering with the communications systems and that the airport authorities were aware of it.

That same afternoon, a Kreyol programmed station was shut down.
 
There is, indeed, a process for the FAA to pass judgment on proposals for new FM stations before they can be built.

In one case near Nashville, the FCC allowed a station to change its "city of license", leaving the original city unserved, something not normally permitted. The licensee showed there was no transmitter site the FAA would approve where the station could provide an adequate signal across its original city.

In another case near Omaha, the FCC refunded the money a company had spent at auction to win a permit for a new station. Again, the permittee showed there was no site the FAA would approve, and in the Omaha case there was no other city to which the station could be moved.
 
Nick said:
There was a pirate in Miami that interfered with aircraft frequencies. It was shut down within a day, the fastest I ever heard the FCC shut down a pirate. If that pirate had only stayed within the FM band, it would still be on today.

IIRC that particular pirate was throwing spurs onto MIA's approach frequency, so pilots couldn't hear their landing instructions and runway assignments. With such an obvious safety issue on the line, the FCC and FAA jumped on that one quickly.
 
I just heard that a ten-watt DTV Translator in Southern Utah (operating on channel 52) was shut down by the FCC in November or December, because it's second-harmonic was interfering with a European Space Agency research satellite.
Yeah, TEN watts.
 
kenglish said:
I just heard that a ten-watt DTV Translator in Southern Utah (operating on channel 52) was shut down by the FCC in November or December, because it's second-harmonic was interfering with a European Space Agency research satellite.
Yeah, TEN watts.
The line of sight path was probably perfect. I've often wondered if my MR-78 tuner could pull anything intelligible out of the FM band jumble that no doubt exists on the lunar surface.
 
kenglish said:
I just heard that a ten-watt DTV Translator in Southern Utah (operating on channel 52) was shut down by the FCC in November or December, because it's second-harmonic was interfering with a European Space Agency research satellite.
Yeah, TEN watts.
Doesn't surprise me at all. We get the signal from space with usually very little power in the satelite transmitter, so the reverse signal from earth would not need to be very strong either. A second harmonic might not be very far down from the 10 Watts in a malfunctioning transmitter. At those frquencies, I have seen the harmonic exceed the fundamental in some malfunctioning system
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom