K
k9ez
Guest
AAR changes satellite channels and doesnt let the affiliates know??? Slick move AAR!
-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
> AAR changes satellite channels and doesnt let the affiliates
> know??? Slick move AAR!
>
What ended up on the air instead?
> know??? Slick move AAR!
>
What ended up on the air instead?
K
k9ez
Guest
> AAR changes satellite channels and doesnt let the affiliates
> know??? Slick move AAR!
>
And before some people get all up in arms about the AAR comment, I would do the same thing if anyone else did the same thing.
> know??? Slick move AAR!
>
And before some people get all up in arms about the AAR comment, I would do the same thing if anyone else did the same thing.
J
JohnnyMorganWXJX
Guest
> > AAR changes satellite channels and doesnt let the
> affiliates
> > know??? Slick move AAR!
> >
> What ended up on the air instead?
>
Valerie Plame's CIA contact information.
> affiliates
> > know??? Slick move AAR!
> >
> What ended up on the air instead?
>
Valerie Plame's CIA contact information.
> > > AAR changes satellite channels and doesnt let the
> > affiliates
> > > know??? Slick move AAR!
> > >
> > What ended up on the air instead?
> >
>
> Valerie Plame's CIA contact information.
>
Dead air, eh?<P ID="signature">______________
"Radio on the Internet is yet another world-shrinking example of what communications analysts call 'death of distance.'" - Tim Jones
<a href="http://saltydog.5gigs.com">
The Salty Dog</a>
</P>
> > affiliates
> > > know??? Slick move AAR!
> > >
> > What ended up on the air instead?
> >
>
> Valerie Plame's CIA contact information.
>
Dead air, eh?<P ID="signature">______________
"Radio on the Internet is yet another world-shrinking example of what communications analysts call 'death of distance.'" - Tim Jones
<a href="http://saltydog.5gigs.com">
The Salty Dog</a>
</P>
J
JohnnyMorganWXJX
Guest
> > > > AAR changes satellite channels and doesnt let the
> > > affiliates
> > > > know??? Slick move AAR!
> > > >
> > > What ended up on the air instead?
> > >
> >
> > Valerie Plame's CIA contact information.
> >
>
> Dead air, eh?
>
I could confirm that only on "deep background".
Otherwise, I'd have to kill you.
Sincerely,
Bill Charles
National Aviation Consulting Corp.
Wichita, Kansas
> > > affiliates
> > > > know??? Slick move AAR!
> > > >
> > > What ended up on the air instead?
> > >
> >
> > Valerie Plame's CIA contact information.
> >
>
> Dead air, eh?
>
I could confirm that only on "deep background".
Otherwise, I'd have to kill you.
Sincerely,
Bill Charles
National Aviation Consulting Corp.
Wichita, Kansas
M
mwebster
Guest
It Figures
Typical. On the computer in a closet which is their New York "flagship," they've been known to: (1) Keep rerunning the same traffic reports for hours at each break (even the traffic reports from the day before). (2) Keep running the network feed through all the breaks. (3) Keep running dead air.
There are as good at selecting computer equipment and automation software as they are at picking air talent.
Typical. On the computer in a closet which is their New York "flagship," they've been known to: (1) Keep rerunning the same traffic reports for hours at each break (even the traffic reports from the day before). (2) Keep running the network feed through all the breaks. (3) Keep running dead air.
There are as good at selecting computer equipment and automation software as they are at picking air talent.
> AAR changes satellite channels and doesnt let the affiliates
> know??? Slick move AAR!
>
A little background, please?<P ID="signature">______________
The Liberal Talk Radio Update</P>
> know??? Slick move AAR!
>
A little background, please?<P ID="signature">______________
The Liberal Talk Radio Update</P>
K
k9ez
Guest
> > AAR changes satellite channels and doesnt let the
> affiliates
> > know??? Slick move AAR!
> >
>
> A little background, please?
>
here is what I know.....
AAR changed satellite channel (for reasons unknown to me) and did not inform some of the affiliates. When some of the affilites figured out what was wrong, their recievers were not authorized to carry that channel. AAR tried to blame the affiliates (one at a time) that it was THEIR (the affiliates) problem, when it actually was a good sized group of stations.
That is all I know.
> affiliates
> > know??? Slick move AAR!
> >
>
> A little background, please?
>
here is what I know.....
AAR changed satellite channel (for reasons unknown to me) and did not inform some of the affiliates. When some of the affilites figured out what was wrong, their recievers were not authorized to carry that channel. AAR tried to blame the affiliates (one at a time) that it was THEIR (the affiliates) problem, when it actually was a good sized group of stations.
That is all I know.
Bush did it.
> Maybe they got cut off because they couldn't pay the bill,
> and had to jump to another carrier real quick...
> <P ID="signature">______________
"Radio on the Internet is yet another world-shrinking example of what communications analysts call 'death of distance.'" - Tim Jones
<a href="http://saltydog.5gigs.com">
The Salty Dog</a>
</P>
> Maybe they got cut off because they couldn't pay the bill,
> and had to jump to another carrier real quick...
> <P ID="signature">______________
"Radio on the Internet is yet another world-shrinking example of what communications analysts call 'death of distance.'" - Tim Jones
<a href="http://saltydog.5gigs.com">
The Salty Dog</a>
</P>
> > > AAR changes satellite channels and doesnt let the
> > affiliates
> > > know??? Slick move AAR!
> > >
> >
> > A little background, please?
> >
>
>
> here is what I know.....
>
> AAR changed satellite channel (for reasons unknown to me)
> and did not inform some of the affiliates. When some of the
> affilites figured out what was wrong, their recievers were
> not authorized to carry that channel. AAR tried to blame
> the affiliates (one at a time) that it was THEIR (the
> affiliates) problem, when it actually was a good sized group
> of stations.
>
> That is all I know.
>
Got a source for all this? I think it's pretty immature throwing out speculation like this without anything to back it up.
<P ID="signature">______________
The Liberal Talk Radio Update</P>
> > affiliates
> > > know??? Slick move AAR!
> > >
> >
> > A little background, please?
> >
>
>
> here is what I know.....
>
> AAR changed satellite channel (for reasons unknown to me)
> and did not inform some of the affiliates. When some of the
> affilites figured out what was wrong, their recievers were
> not authorized to carry that channel. AAR tried to blame
> the affiliates (one at a time) that it was THEIR (the
> affiliates) problem, when it actually was a good sized group
> of stations.
>
> That is all I know.
>
Got a source for all this? I think it's pretty immature throwing out speculation like this without anything to back it up.
<P ID="signature">______________
The Liberal Talk Radio Update</P>
K
k9ez
Guest
> > > > AAR changes satellite channels and doesnt let the
> > > affiliates
> > > > know??? Slick move AAR!
> > > >
> > >
> > > A little background, please?
> > >
> >
> >
> > here is what I know.....
> >
> > AAR changed satellite channel (for reasons unknown to me)
> > and did not inform some of the affiliates. When some of
> the
> > affilites figured out what was wrong, their recievers were
>
> > not authorized to carry that channel. AAR tried to blame
> > the affiliates (one at a time) that it was THEIR (the
> > affiliates) problem, when it actually was a good sized
> group
> > of stations.
> >
> > That is all I know.
> >
>
>
> Got a source for all this? I think it's pretty immature
> throwing out speculation like this without anything to back
> it up.
>
Yes I do and I will leave it at that. Immature? um no, ask around, do a little more research and you will find it. I am not trying to hide anything or make this up.
As I said in a previous post, it doesnt matter what company did this. If Rush did the same thing I would have stated the same comment.
> > > affiliates
> > > > know??? Slick move AAR!
> > > >
> > >
> > > A little background, please?
> > >
> >
> >
> > here is what I know.....
> >
> > AAR changed satellite channel (for reasons unknown to me)
> > and did not inform some of the affiliates. When some of
> the
> > affilites figured out what was wrong, their recievers were
>
> > not authorized to carry that channel. AAR tried to blame
> > the affiliates (one at a time) that it was THEIR (the
> > affiliates) problem, when it actually was a good sized
> group
> > of stations.
> >
> > That is all I know.
> >
>
>
> Got a source for all this? I think it's pretty immature
> throwing out speculation like this without anything to back
> it up.
>
Yes I do and I will leave it at that. Immature? um no, ask around, do a little more research and you will find it. I am not trying to hide anything or make this up.
As I said in a previous post, it doesnt matter what company did this. If Rush did the same thing I would have stated the same comment.
- Status
- This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.