• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Don Geronimo Fired from Big 100

Geeez, you think calling a black woman "nappy headed ho" is the same as calling a blonde-haired woman "Barbie"? Okie dokie.
I didn't say it's the same, but it IS appearance based on looks. I don't believe Imus got fired over that remark either, but should have. In the 50s, some Men called Woman ""Broads". That was widely acceptable. Whether you like it or not, times change. Geronimo should have known better, so it's hard to feel sorry for him. The team he was covering was once the Redskins, so he knew about all the turmoil this franchise has been through. Flip remarks that were once acceptable can now have consequences...
 
Last edited:
Don Geronimo has issued an apology:

Fourth graf says most of what you need to know about that press release:

Geronimo set to clear the record on that exchange in his apology that was sent to Inside Radio by Buchanan Public Relations, which specializes in crisis communications.
 
Fourth graf says most of what you need to know about that press release:

Geronimo set to clear the record on that exchange in his apology that was sent to Inside Radio by Buchanan Public Relations, which specializes in crisis communications.

It was also sent to Ms. McBride's TV station:


The article ends with this quote:

“I have reached out to Ms. McBride to apologize. When she feels ready, I hope that we can have a conversation and that I will have the opportunity to reiterate my apology to her in person,” the statement concluded. “I hope that Ms. McBride and the listeners who heard me will forgive me. I am better than this, and I promise to demonstrate that going forward.”
 
Last edited:
I didn't say it's the same, but it IS appearance based on looks. I don't believe Imus got fired over that remark either, but should have.
Not only did he get fired for that remark after 35 years on that frequency (save '77-'79), it was pretty big news at the time in 2007. He met with the Rutgers team in NJ, which was to be attended by the Governor who ended up being injured in a car accident on the way there. Imus apologized to the women diretly at that meeting---and even went on AL Sharpton's radio show to apologize! His firing was a big story on all the networks. It's also the reason he eventually landed at crrosstown WABC for the last stretch of his career.
 
Not only did he get fired for that remark after 35 years on that frequency (save '77-'79), it was pretty big news at the time in 2007. He met with the Rutgers team in NJ, which was to be attended by the Governor who ended up being injured in a car accident on the way there. Imus apologized to the women diretly at that meeting---and even went on AL Sharpton's radio show to apologize! His firing was a big story on all the networks. It's also the reason he eventually landed at crrosstown WABC for the last stretch of his career.
Thanks for the reminder. I recall he wasn't immediately fired, but his TV simulcast was pulled. You're right he was fired about a week later. He did the obligatory apology circuit and landed the new gig...
 
Last edited:
Considering that Don Geronimo has been sued at least 3 times for stunts like this in the past, you would think that sooner or later he either would have learned what NOT to say, or that Radio stations will stop employing him. Sadly, he probably hasn't learned anything, and I'm sure someone out there will give him another chance.
 
Considering that Don Geronimo has been sued at least 3 times for stunts like this in the past, you would think that sooner or later he either would have learned what NOT to say, or that Radio stations will stop employing him. Sadly, he probably hasn't learned anything, and I'm sure someone out there will give him another chance.
He's not sorry for what said. He IS sorry that he got fired because the wrong people heard his comments. Some of these guys need a 7 Second Delay from brain to mouth...
 
Would a man be offended by it? Would he complain or sue?

Did female workers harass male players?
At some point, we have to understand as a nation and society that different people and different groups see things in different ways. We are now being conditioned to be offended by anything we do not personally agree with; that removes the possibility of dialogue and separates us even more.

When I became GM of one of Mooney Broadcasting's stations... the one in their biggest market... I was 24 and the youngest person on the staff. I discovered that some of the staff had given me a nickname that was a mildly offensive term for someone young and inexperienced. Since I took over a station that was losing horrible amounts of money, there was little I could say.

Instead of disciplining anyone, I let it ride. A month or so later, we got our first book where we had gone to a tie for #1 with the station that had been #1 for nearly four decades. I had picked up the book myself, and said nothing when I got to our offices. I typed a memo, made copies: it said "WUNO is Número Uno.... and tied with the station that had been #1 for four decades" I signed it with the nickname and posted it all over.

End of problem. A good laugh. Everyone came closer, and a bit of humor let everyone know I wanted a free and relaxed atmosphere. Today, there would be lawyers, firings, investigations and the whole batch of attacks and counter attacks.

Oh, and I was the the only minority group member on the staff.
 
At some point, we have to understand as a nation and society that different people and different groups see things in different ways. We are now being conditioned to be offended by anything we do not personally agree with; that removes the possibility of dialogue and separates us even more.

When I became GM of one of Mooney Broadcasting's stations... the one in their biggest market... I was 24 and the youngest person on the staff. I discovered that some of the staff had given me a nickname that was a mildly offensive term for someone young and inexperienced. Since I took over a station that was losing horrible amounts of money, there was little I could say.

Instead of disciplining anyone, I let it ride. A month or so later, we got our first book where we had gone to a tie for #1 with the station that had been #1 for nearly four decades. I had picked up the book myself, and said nothing when I got to our offices. I typed a memo, made copies: it said "WUNO is Número Uno.... and tied with the station that had been #1 for four decades" I signed it with the nickname and posted it all over.

End of problem. A good laugh. Everyone came closer, and a bit of humor let everyone know I wanted a free and relaxed atmosphere. Today, there would be lawyers, firings, investigations and the whole batch of attacks and counter attacks.

Oh, and I was the the only minority group member on the staff.
Interesting. So you were the boss? I don't see how the Geronimo incident is similar. I'm not sure what you're advocating. I guess things were better when we could grope women and use racial epithets with impunity. Thems were the days...
 
Interesting. So you were the boss?
Yes, for a staff of about 38 people.
I don't see how the Geronimo incident is similar.
I was "venting" and said that people are too sensitive, to polarized compared to the past when we were much more willing to find commonalities and build from there.
I'm not sure what you're advocating.
More flexibility in accepting different perspective
I guess things were better when we could grope women and use racial epithets with impunity. Thems were the days...
You have obviously no direct knowledge of this. I never saw "groping" nor heard "racial epithets". But I was almolst always a minority in a my first thirty or so years in radio...
 
I was "venting" and said that people are too sensitive, to polarized compared to the past when we were much more willing to find commonalities and build from there.

More flexibility in accepting different perspective
I agree with you that people are polarized. Talk Radio has contributed to getting us here. Finding common ground is viewed as weakness now.

I have seen women groped in a workplace. Some of it was definitely unwanted and some was office flirting. Behaviours that were once overlooked or acceptable are now considered out of bounds. Change forces people to adapt and some resent that. That includes Radio jocks...
 
When I became GM of one of Mooney Broadcasting's stations... the one in their biggest market... I was 24 and the youngest person on the staff. I discovered that some of the staff had given me a nickname that was a mildly offensive term for someone young and inexperienced.
Did they call you Barbie too??
Oh, and I was the the only minority group member on the staff.
Last I checked, white isn't considered a minority group.
 
Did they call you Barbie too??
Kind of the equivalent in Spanish… it was the name of a kind of annoying know-it-all kid on one of the local TV shows.
Last I checked, white isn't considered a minority group.
It is in Puerto Rico. or Ecuador. Or Mexico. Or the Dominican Republic or nearly all of the 18 countries I have worked in. A minority is any group that is not the prevalent race or culture or religion or ethnicity.

in 1970, with a population of just over 3 million, there were less than 20,000 “gringos” on the Island, which was certainly a minority in race, color and ethnicity.

In fact, in Puerto Rico we have an expression, “and where is your grandmother” which means “everyone” has some Afro Antillian blood.
 
Last edited:
“As has been reported, I insensitively used the terms ‘Barbie,’ ‘Barbie girl,’ and ‘chick’ when talking about Ms. McBride, a fellow broadcaster who I did not know or recognize when she walked by our broadcast position. My attempts to be humorous and topical backfired, and I needlessly deprecated a professional colleague.”

So, it's only bad because she was a professional colleague who Don didn't recognize...but it would have been OK if she were some other woman that walked by who wasn't a broadcaster? That's how it reads to me. It seems like a bizarre way for him to try to explain his way out of it.

I'm surprised no one else has mentioned this. It's the first thing I noticed about his statement.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom