• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Dopey Blondes, Brian Andrews, & StormHype 3000

Before getting into the usual circus of shame, kudos to the local reporters in New Orleans, Mobile, and surrounding areas who are risking a lot to keep their local communities informed about the situation on the ground. They are doing an excellent job.

If only the cable news outlets (and a few carpetbagging reporters from out of the markets) were as respectful.

1) The largest storm of all is the barrage of pretty young blonde things that turned up to sit in the anchor chairs to report/hype the news. The Fox Blonde effect has definitely entrenched itself at MSNBC as well. The -only- exception was one anchor who actually lived in the affected area and could actually provide some context. Most of the rest managed little more than getting all bug-eyed and read what was put in front of them. CNN is the only one bucking the trend... barely.

2) A few small holes in the roof of the Superdome, as reported by their OWN reporters on the ground, does not translate into "massive hole torn in roof of Superdome" as CNN and MSNBC were putting on their crawls earlier today. Some networks even wasted time building on this hyped report by asking their reporters if they saw panic and mass evacuations of the Superdome at the height of the storm. Most of the reporters seems surprised by the question, which was answered confidently with a universal "no."

3) Brian Andrews needs to take his dog and pony Fear Factor show back to Miami. At one point, Andrews' staged reporting was belied when one news channel ran his tape a bit early, which allowed viewers to watch this guy set up his supposedly "spontaneous" shot with him heading out from the hotel into the weather outside. 5, 4, 3, 2 went the countdown followed by him being "shocked" by the sheer force of the wind, as the dope dashed back and forth in the street, hid behind a mailbox, and got blown onto his face.

Anderson Cooper moronically stood out over the Mississippi River by a barge that was almost banging into his dock or boardwalk. Not once, twice, but four times Cooper commented on a crane hook that was freely blowing all over the place and could have easily smashed into him or the platform he was standing on. He then sees some folks outside standing into the wind (perhaps playing Brian Andrews), and viewers get to watch the CNN anchor in Atlanta criticize these people for being reckless and thickheaded for standing out in the dangerous storm... now back to you Anderson, standing out in the dangerous storm... Anderson, aren't those OTHER people stupid?

Some of the other tapes sent to CNN featured anorexic sweet young things in lil ponchos and baseball caps (what is with the baseball caps) being blown all over parking lots yelling at viewers that the weather is terrible and they should stay inside. Dangerous weather, but not dangerous enough for them.

Just once I'd like to see some reporter nearly swept out to sea, conked on the head, or blown into another zip code. Only then (after the networks cover it as the major story of the day) might they think twice about pulling moronic stunts which, themselves, only lead viewers to try exactly the same thing. A responsible reporter would tell viewers "it's dangerous as hell, I'm not going out there, and you shouldn't either."

4) News channels should not determine the extent of damage based solely on the footage they receive from their own reporters. After making suggestions the entire city of New Orleans would be under 20 feet of water yesterday, today's early reports suggested New Orleans got to breathe a sigh of relief because the storm veered to the east, wrecking Mississippi and Alabama instead. This was based on a lot of reports from those in downtown New Orleans who were somewhat safer than those out in the suburbs. I somehow think things are going to be far, far worse than what their own camera crews have brought them.


Those looking for the best reports should try and find them from streaming local stations, because that is where the real story is.
 
You know, you were making excellent points until you got to this:

> Just once I'd like to see some reporter nearly swept out to
> sea, conked on the head, or blown into another zip code.
> Only then (after the networks cover it as the major story of
> the day) might they think twice about pulling moronic stunts
> which, themselves, only lead viewers to try exactly the same
> thing.

I cannot, in good moral conscience, agree with a statement that wishes harm (or possibly death) on a colleague, no matter how stupid he or she is behaving.<P ID="signature">______________


</P>
 
> You know, you were making excellent points until you got to
> this:
>
> > Just once I'd like to see some reporter nearly swept out
> to
> > sea, conked on the head, or blown into another zip code.
> > Only then (after the networks cover it as the major story
> of
> > the day) might they think twice about pulling moronic
> stunts
> > which, themselves, only lead viewers to try exactly the
> same
> > thing.
>
> I cannot, in good moral conscience, agree with a statement
> that wishes harm (or possibly death) on a colleague, no
> matter how stupid he or she is behaving.
>
I agree. Someone at another forum I frequent wished death upon Dave Price... at which point I gave him a verbal beatdown. That goes beyond my moral boundaries.
 
> > You know, you were making excellent points until you got
> to
> > this:
> >
> > > Just once I'd like to see some reporter nearly swept out
>
> > to
> > > sea, conked on the head, or blown into another zip code.
>
> > > Only then (after the networks cover it as the major
> story
> > of
> > > the day) might they think twice about pulling moronic
> > stunts
> > > which, themselves, only lead viewers to try exactly the
> > same
> > > thing.
> >
> > I cannot, in good moral conscience, agree with a statement
the beginning >
> > that wishes harm (or possibly death) on a colleague, no
> > matter how stupid he or she is behaving.
> >
> I agree. Someone at another forum I frequent wished death
> upon Dave Price... at which point I gave him a verbal
> beatdown. That goes beyond my moral boundaries.
>
Your observations are well intentioned and wholly correct. It seems that a contest is on among on-camera people to see who can remain standing and squealing into a microphone during the strongest winds. What's the story--television people bucking a headwind or the hurricane itself? Sounds and looks like the beginning of a new Letterman schtick--Stupid Reporter Tricks.

One positive note,though, on the hurricane coverage. So far no claims that "Greta owns the story."
 
I think the O.P. statement was more idiomatic than anything.

But if you ever look at the old newsreels of reporters covering WWII and Korea, and to an extent Vietnam. You don't see the unprofessional behaviour. It's like a joke to these reporters and Anderson "Am I posed correctly, so I look cool" is by far the worst offender.

There was a professionalism that is sorely missed by me, and unfortunately until a reporter dies or is seriously injured the shenanigans and stunts will only get worse.
<P ID="signature">______________
Once I figured out the meaning of life....Then I forgot to write it down.</P>
 
> I think the O.P. statement was more idiomatic than anything.
>
>
> But if you ever look at the old newsreels of reporters
> covering WWII and Korea, and to an extent Vietnam. You don't
> see the unprofessional behaviour. It's like a joke to these
> reporters and Anderson "Am I posed correctly, so I look
> cool" is by far the worst offender.
>
> There was a professionalism that is sorely missed by me, and
> unfortunately until a reporter dies or is seriously injured
> the shenanigans and stunts will only get worse.


Completely agree with you. Fox, MSNBC, and CNN each ran long segments on their reporters mugging for the camera in obviously contrived "hey look at me" pieces designed entirely to impress the audience rather than inform the audience.

What these inanities communicate to the audience is zero. These people are turning themselves into "hurricane clowns," and think of themselves as the story while the collective damage, destruction, and death is nothing but a stage prop for a bunch of amateurs playing reporter. This bunch wouldn't have lasted a day in Nam or other world hot spots.

Sorry folks, do take two and try to pump a bit of real reporting into the effort. The hurricane left you PLENTY to report on, but you clearly think that is secondary to your own false self-importance. Kept thinking during the dog and pony show the production people would overdub Judy Collins singing "Bring in the Clowns," or James Darren doing "Goodbye Cruel World I'm Off to Join the Circus."

Give the viewers some real coverage, not an organ grinder with a monkey--and a videographer.
 
> > I think the O.P. statement was more idiomatic than
> anything.
> >
> >
> > But if you ever look at the old newsreels of reporters
> > covering WWII and Korea, and to an extent Vietnam. You
> don't
> > see the unprofessional behaviour. It's like a joke to
> these
> > reporters and Anderson "Am I posed correctly, so I look
> > cool" is by far the worst offender.
> >
> > There was a professionalism that is sorely missed by me,
> and
> > unfortunately until a reporter dies or is seriously
> injured
> > the shenanigans and stunts will only get worse.
>
>
> Completely agree with you. Fox, MSNBC, and CNN each ran
> long segments on their reporters mugging for the camera in
> obviously contrived "hey look at me" pieces designed
> entirely to impress the audience rather than inform the
> audience.
>
> What these inanities communicate to the audience is zero.
> These people are turning themselves into "hurricane clowns,"
> and think of themselves as the story while the collective
> damage, destruction, and death is nothing but a stage prop
> for a bunch of amateurs playing reporter. This bunch
> wouldn't have lasted a day in Nam or other world hot spots.
>
> Sorry folks, do take two and try to pump a bit of real
> reporting into the effort. The hurricane left you PLENTY to
> report on, but you clearly think that is secondary to your
> own false self-importance. Kept thinking during the dog and
> pony show the production people would overdub Judy Collins
> singing "Bring in the Clowns," or James Darren doing
> "Goodbye Cruel World I'm Off to Join the Circus."
>
> Give the viewers some real coverage, not an organ grinder
> with a monkey--and a videographer.
>
I was expecting to see either Super Dave Osborne or Robbie Kenevel reporting. No offense to the real victims. The reporter running out from cover towards a mailbox then running back to cover didn't make any sense to me.<P ID="signature">______________
"Always on the move." Obi-Wan Kenobi in Revenge Of the Sith</P>
 
> I cannot, in good moral conscience, agree with a statement
> that wishes harm (or possibly death) on a colleague, no
> matter how stupid he or she is behaving.

Relax... I'm not suggesting there be a reporter body count or even an ambulance trip - just enough of a close call that would make people stop acting like idiots.

One of the sheriff deputies wasn't happy with the antics by the reporters either. He told the GC Storm Network that reporters heading out into the flooding would be on their own because he's not going to take the time to rescue media people when there are "real victims still trapped in their homes" all over his area.
 
> I was expecting to see either Super Dave Osborne or Robbie
> Kenevel reporting. No offense to the real victims. The
> reporter running out from cover towards a mailbox then
> running back to cover didn't make any sense to me.

I've been trying to help out with information on several of the message forums set up for Katrina victims and those who fled the area and are looking for information. I've seen more than a dozen very angry condemnations of Brian Andrews alone from people who are outraged the man is playing with their very real tragedy. Many of these people are worried they lost everything and when they watch their TV, they see an idiot playing dash and cover (and the media -loves- this stuff because it's been played over and over again).

One woman who heard her entire house is probably under water wants his phone number because "since he has so much free time, maybe he can help me clean up and see what real tragedy is all about. This guy should be fired."
 
But I thought CNN was Essential, when the Weather is the News(TM)!

Yep, it is ESSENTIAL for us to see Anderson Cooper's idiotic behaviour. Absolutely essential.
 
> But I thought CNN was Essential, when the Weather is the
> News(TM)!
>
> Yep, it is ESSENTIAL for us to see Anderson Cooper's idiotic
> behaviour. Absolutely essential.
>

I love it when the reporter deliberately puts himself/herself in harm's way......and when he or she is done with their "hurricane update"........the blonde sitting at her comfy desk back in New York says (with that vomit-inducing fake "concerned mother" tone of voice), "Now you be careful, okay? If it gets any worse where you are, you be sure and seek cover! You here me?!" ........And the dizzy reporter, who's standing up to his knees in water--while a 65 mph wind is about to knock him off his feet, says with a smile, "Oh, don't worry, I will"

What a joke!
 
> > But I thought CNN was Essential, when the Weather is the
> > News(TM)!
> >
> > Yep, it is ESSENTIAL for us to see Anderson Cooper's
> idiotic
> > behaviour. Absolutely essential.
> >
>
> I love it when the reporter deliberately puts
> himself/herself in harm's way......and when he or she is
> done with their "hurricane update"........the blonde sitting
> at her comfy desk back in New York says (with that
> vomit-inducing fake "concerned mother" tone of voice), "Now
> you be careful, okay? If it gets any worse where you are,
> you be sure and seek cover! You here me?!" ........And the
> dizzy reporter, who's standing up to his knees in
> water--while a 65 mph wind is about to knock him off his
> feet, says with a smile, "Oh, don't worry, I will"
>
> What a joke!
>
And a very poor joke at that. All the self-aggrandizing buffoonery is what happens when bunches of wanna-be television performers are given 24 hours to fill with their idea of "news." The true value of Fox, MSNBC, CNN, et al has shown itself to be zero, nada, zilch.

In fairness, the legitimate news organizations are doing an excellent job of covering the story. But these other illegitimate children of the business have disgraced themselves--from the put-on artists in the field to the mother hens in the studio.
 
I feel bad for...

the crews who have to endure this bullisht. The camera guys and the truck operators are the ones who are more likely going to get injured than the goofball reporters who think its fun to stand in 100mph winds.

Most of them are basically doing what they are roped into doing.

On the other hand from all the negativity in this post, I have to say the Weather Channel really shined this time. Instead of constant reporting from people in the wind and the same stock video over and over, it was nice that they took a "prepare for the worst" style broadcast over a "lets see the damage" style like the others did. I was personally impressed.
 
> > I was expecting to see either Super Dave Osborne or Robbie
>
> > Kenevel reporting. No offense to the real victims. The
> > reporter running out from cover towards a mailbox then
> > running back to cover didn't make any sense to me.
>
> I've been trying to help out with information on several of
> the message forums set up for Katrina victims and those who
> fled the area and are looking for information. I've seen
> more than a dozen very angry condemnations of Brian Andrews
> alone from people who are outraged the man is playing with
> their very real tragedy. Many of these people are worried
> they lost everything and when they watch their TV, they see
> an idiot playing dash and cover (and the media -loves- this
> stuff because it's been played over and over again).
>
> One woman who heard her entire house is probably under water
> wants his phone number because "since he has so much free
> time, maybe he can help me clean up and see what real
> tragedy is all about. This guy should be fired."
>
I think that Mr. Andrews should have to help the crews with the clean-up in the affected areas after his stupid mailbox stunt. When I saw the clip yesterday,I thought,This guy is a complete idiot.<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by ChrisConfalone on 08/30/05 11:56 PM.</FONT></P>
 
Re: I feel bad for...

> the crews who have to endure this bullisht. The camera guys
> and the truck operators are the ones who are more likely
> going to get injured than the goofball reporters who think
> its fun to stand in 100mph winds.
>
> Most of them are basically doing what they are roped into
> doing.
>
> On the other hand from all the negativity in this post, I
> have to say the Weather Channel really shined this time.
> Instead of constant reporting from people in the wind and
> the same stock video over and over, it was nice that they
> took a "prepare for the worst" style broadcast over a "lets
> see the damage" style like the others did. I was personally
> impressed.

Great observation. My posts among others overlooked the common sense approach and emphasis on usable information that the Weather Channel used. The people on the channel have arrived and don't need to display themselves standing in the midst of a storm to sell themselves at the expense of competently reporting on the event they're there to cover.

Can't help but wonder if producers, executives, and others at Fox, MSNBC, and CNN are in retrospect realizing at least a little bit how silly and ignorant they made themselves look with their anchors twisting in the wind debacle. Now they need to be hung out to dry. Or are they sitting around congratulating themselves and working on ways to make the coverage look even more senseless when they move on to cover the next hurricane.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom