They aren't bad to as other than air chain processing. Run your phone interface through it. It does a nice job keeping the tonal quality of your phone calls consistant. I don't know if they are using one, but listen to the quality of the phone calls on the Hanity show. That nice low end on the caller sounds great!
Not bad to run a comrex through if you want your remotes to sound closer to your studio mic/mic processing.
There are uses for these. Make sure you re-cap them and make sure it's all working right.
> > > Anyone have a manual for one of these? A copy would be
> > > fine.
> > > Also, if anyone has any thoughts on these 70's vintage
> > > boxes, I'd like to hear them.
> > >
> > Go to your friendly garden store and buy a nice flowering
> > tree.
> >
> > Dig a large hole.
> >
> > Put the DAP in the bottom.
> >
> > Then the tree's root ball on top of the DAP.
> >
> > Add dirt. ;-)
> >
> No No No.....don't treat that poor littl' ol' DAP that way!
> You must not be old enough to remember when the 310 first
> came out. The world was awash in LevelDevils and Volumax's,
> with most major market stations cascading anywhere from 3 to
> 10 units with progressively faster attack/release times.
> Usually drug the audio across a couple of diodes after that,
> followed by a crude RC filter. But then, half the AM
> stations in the USA couldn't modulate positives above 70%,
> so who noticed.
> The times were cool but the waves were square!!
> The DAP was an amazing "contraption" and sounded awesome! It
> quickly became the industry standard in the 70's. AM solid
> state also came out with real positive peak
> capability.....decent AM audio performance was in reach!
> It needed to be tweaked every year or so....once you knew
> the routine it was easy to keep it sounding good. The
> clipper was very "soft" and was not very good....same for
> the assymmetry circuit. There were a million replacement
> clipper boards for the DAP....practically everyone built
> one.
> You had to keep an eraser for the circuit board edge
> connectors......
> I still know of a station, owned by an old engineer, who
> uses a DAP. In his rack is a brand new 9200. He swears the
> DAP sounds better....
>