• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

E-Skip alert!

Here are the stations I picked up: 162.450 somewhere in S. Texas.162.475- Waco, 162.425- Throckmorton, 162.400- Austin/San Antonio, and 162.500- Cisco. KWBU, KXAN, KHCE, KXXV, LPB, KIAH, and KTXS
 
eskipper411 said:
Here are the stations I picked up: 162.450 somewhere in S. Texas.162.475- Waco, 162.425- Throckmorton, 162.400- Austin/San Antonio, and 162.500- Cisco. KWBU, KXAN, KHCE, KXXV, LPB, KIAH, and KTXS
added KZJL and KBTX.
 
I think you got tropo, actually.

-crainbebo
 
Primer on the difference between e-skip & tropo

Then it's tropospheric ducting and not e-skip. Here's a very basic description of each (engineers out there may chime in with expanded detail!):

E-skip would be if you managed to pull in stations from Ohio or Wyoming. Tropo is an atmospheric condition which allows signals to be 'ducted' beyond their normal range. For example, a station that may only have a normal range of 70 miles now can be heard strongly 150 miles away. Something like that. Very common in humid weather or when there's an inversion layer in the lower atmosphere - both of which will tend to capture the signal before it heads off into the upper atmosphere - sending the signal downward beyond the normal horizon.

E-skip means that the e layer of the ionosphere has become energized and is reflecting signals that would otherwise go into space - back to earth. Because the e layer is so high up (80 miles?), the effect is that you have stations bouncing in from 800 - 1800 miles away. It's also a very unstable condition and often during such events you hear stations fading in and out and being swapped with other distant signals. Tropospheric ducting, on the other hand, can be stable for several hours.

Lastly, it would be very unusual to get NOAA Weather Radio signals via e-skip as most such events mainly affect the VHF-TV and lower portion of the FM band. Occasionally they do open up to 108 MHz, but 162 would be too high of a wavelength in all but the most incredible cases. Most e-skip has traditionally been detected first on VHF channel 2 (which is around 59 MHz). Now with everything in digital, it is not as good a guide as it once was.

Rule of thumb: if the signal is coming from less than 500 miles away, it's tropospheric ducting (which is by far more common than e-skip).
 
eskipper411 said:
I did'nt know because I am new to DXing.

I suspected as much and there are a few posters here who similarly confuse the two phenomena. Hope my explanation helps a bit - and have fun dxing!
 
Good catches! Did you compute the mileage? What I do is determine the geodetic (sea level) distance between the latitude & longitude of the x-mitter site and my house. If you'd like more detailed info, shoot a pvt message my way and I'll help you out any way I can.

Good hunting!!!!
r
 
BRNout is, for the most part, right. But there are a few amplifications I might make.

NOAA radio, in the 162 MHz band, would almost always be tropo when heard over long distances. But, there are indeed times that they are heard via sporadic-E (Es). In extreme openings, e-skip signals can get that high. As a ham, I work 144 MHz, not far below, and I have already seen a couple of openings this Summer. In one opening, there was a path on 162 MHz between NJ and AR. Still, it is rare.

Tropo can happen over long distances. I have gotten tropo out to 1000 miles. But, again, it's rare. Over time, you'll develop a feel for the two, and can tell the difference easily.

But, if you're getting high VHF (like NOAA) at just a few hundred miles, it will be tropo.

DE
 
DeadElvis said:
BRNout is, for the most part, right. But there are a few amplifications I might make.

NOAA radio, in the 162 MHz band, would almost always be tropo when heard over long distances. But, there are indeed times that they are heard via sporadic-E (Es). In extreme openings, e-skip signals can get that high. As a ham, I work 144 MHz, not far below, and I have already seen a couple of openings this Summer. In one opening, there was a path on 162 MHz between NJ and AR. Still, it is rare.

Tropo can happen over long distances. I have gotten tropo out to 1000 miles. But, again, it's rare. Over time, you'll develop a feel for the two, and can tell the difference easily.

But, if you're getting high VHF (like NOAA) at just a few hundred miles, it will be tropo.

DE

I've Tropod some NOAA before. During a heavy thunderstorm NOAA weather radio was practically useless. My Local NOAA was being overrun By One In Shreveport. all the Other NOAA's were Louisiana And East Texas.
 
LibertyNT said:
I've Tropo'd some NOAA before. During a heavy thunderstorm NOAA weather radio was practically useless. My Local NOAA was being overrun by one In Shreveport. all the Other NOAA's were Louisiana And East Texas.

That means the SAME (Specific Area Message Encoding) technology would not give you a warning for your local area - that would concern me,
especially if a tornado, hail or thunderstorms with lightning were heading in your direction. Here is some info. on how that works for those unfamiliar with SAME: http://www.nws.noaa.gov/nwr/nwrsame.htm
 
July 6, 2004 had an e-skip opening up to TV channel 13! The skip was intense all day, and all the locals were unlistenable. I got over 100 new logs.
 
Ah, yes... July 6th, 2004. The VHF Editor for QST, the Amateur Radio magazine, calls it the biggest VHF opening ever seen in North America. I was lucky enough to catch it, having just gotten a 2m (144 MHz) SSB station on-air a few weeks before.

The E-cloud was over the Appalachians, and was open at 144 MHz or above for 4 hours. Amazing.

Without getting too esoteric into ham stuff, the band was so wide open, I even moved off SSB and called CQ on the FM call channel -- and got a pile-up! I worked a couple of guys in Boston traffic, just using standard 2m FM-only rigs and 1/4 wave mag mount antennas.

I didn't check FM broadcast, but I'm sure it was solid signals.

DE
 
Wow! I wish I logged a lot of stuff that day!

-crainbebo
 
Had some e-skip this afternoon in Ohio. I was alerted by some interference on WHIO-FM at 95.7.

Positive ID's
93.5 KLXK Breckinridge, TX.\, with country as "Lakes 93-5".
94.9 KLTY, Arlington TX, over Rewind 94-9 (whatever their calls are this week)

Prettys sure of

94.1, KLNO, Spanish over and under Cincy's Frequency 94.1
91.7 someone carrying "Point of View" (KVTT?)
90.9 another religious, carrying "Walk in the Word", (KCBI?)
96.3 Country mixing with Columbus' WLVQ, presumably KSCS.
 
I missed that, but got some so-so tropo today, including the following stations

101.9: KINK Portland, OR (158 miles)
102.1: KSWW Montesano, WA (73 miles, groundwave)
105.7: KJET Raymond, WA (101 miles) or KJET-FM1, a booster station out of Aberdeen, WA (85 miles, more likely)
102.1: Shania Twain's "MAN! I Feel Like a Woman". Not sure if it's KSWW again or someone else.
I heard some AC music on 105.7 this morning. Not sure if it's the same statioin (KJET) or not. Was a good 5/10 with little static, then faded out to CBU.

-crainbebo
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom