Nick said:w9wi said:One might wonder whether activating EAS would have actually made it *more difficult* to get information to the public?
I don't know how things are wired in the Boston area but hereabouts (and in many other places), when an EAS is issued it automatically overrides ALL channels on cable TV. Including the local news operations like WBZ-TV. You lose a minute or two's worth of the detailed information & images available on TV in favor of a grey screen with someone reading a single paragraph of text.
It probably wouldn't have been a bad idea to activate EAS **on the 162MHz weather radio only**. To get the attention of those who *don't* already have their radio/TV on. Although I have my suspicions the system is wired in such a way that isn't possible.
_________________________________________________
markvidpa said:It's a no-brainer to me. If your mailing address is in X County, and there is a storm warning or etc. for there, you should get an alert. If you're not in X County at the time, so be it.
I believe the White House is working in co-op with Homeland Security to develop a system where every last one of us gets an alert in the even of a national emergency like 9/11.
I don't see that as a privacy issue. I see that as using the existing technology to provide us information in a quick and efficient way.
Please, no..
I don't see a privacy issue but I do see an issue with "crying wolf". At least around here, Amber Alerts are issued statewide and regardless of the hour. Which means if you can't turn them off, you will be awakened at 3am to be informed of an emergency that you likely can do absolutely nothing about. Is the perp really going to drive through a rural county 400 miles from the crime? Is a sleep-deprived commuter likely to get in a wreck? IMHO #2 is more likely...
I've had to throw out an otherwise good weather radio because it predated the CAE code & I couldn't mute it.
Mobile alerting is a good thing but it needs to be voluntary & configurable.
They could have the National Weather Service issue the alert, even though it's not weather related. Issue it as a tornado warning so that the weather radios will turn on. Besides, the residents of Watertown should have treated it like a tornado, and hid in their basements, because there was an active shootout, and bullets can easily pierce walls.
No, no, no, a thousand times no. "Crying wolf" is exactly the point.
A system like EAS, if over-used or misused, loses whatever trust the public has in it. It will cease to be a viable method for short-fuse warnings to the public of imminent danger to life if the public's impulse is to ignore it. In certain places in the US, most notably the tornado belt in the midwest, failure to heed EAS warnings gets people killed.
It is patently stupid to send out EAS weather alerts when there's no severe weather, just to get people's attention. No one will ever trust EAS ever again, for anything, and the Amber alerts (cited above) are a perfect example. Unfortunately Amber alerts have become a political issue that no one can seriously oppose without being accused of not wanting to protect children.