• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

EAS & AMBER ALERTS - The Old Problem Resurfaces

I see the old bugaboo of flawed EAS messages had reared its ugly head this past week. The longer I stay out of radio, the more I see and hear that somethings never change.

This past Friday afternoon, an Amber Alert EAS was sent, causing KFBK and all Comcast cable TV channels to interrupt programming with the dulcet tones of an EAS, then – no audio. No information regarding this Amber Alert was attached to the EAS.

I was watching news on Comcast at the time, but wondered if things hadn’t improved since my days in both commercial and non-commercial Sacramento radio, so I clicked on KFBK, to hear their EAS was noteworthy in their complete lack the sole purpose of the entire system – the info.

I bring this up now, for both the father who had apparently kidnapped his daughter and the child were found dead over the weekend.

Several years ago, a few months before quitting as a news anchor/board op at KFBK, a very time-sensitive - it may have been an Amber Alert, but my memory isn’t all that keen - EAS was screwed up royally. I was on an evening shift as news anchor during The Mark Williams Show. While prepping for the next news break, the “EAS Emergency” telephone rang in that dreary, dirty old newsroom. I happened to be the only poor dumb bastard there, and I answered it and heard an unidentified voice quickly asked, “Why haven’t you broadcast the EAS we sent out?”

From where that phone was located, I could see the EAS monitor on the equipment bank behind the Board Op on duty in KFBK Control, with no lights flashing to indicate an EAS had been received. I told whoever was on the phone I’d double check with the Board Op and I also ran into KSTE Control to see if that monitor had received an EAS. Nothing. Then I personally checked with the KFBK Board Op, who had no idea what the hell I was talking about.

I reported this, then asked them to resend the EAS. To make this as short as possible, it took three more attempts before an EAS was received with any audio attached – and that audio, naturally, was unintelligible. The “Emergency” computer monitor next to the main news editor’s station also had no info on this alert.

Finally, over ½ hour after this initial phone call, we were able to broadcast that EAS, but it was like pulling teeth.

The post-mortem meeting with EAS officials, CHP Brass, KFBK management, engineers, and others, was a classic finger pointer – “He didn’t do it.” I spoke up and suggested that the KFBK Control Room should have a computer/monitor with audio-to-the-air capability where, upon issuing an EAS Alert of any kind, the issuing authority should record their audio into a computer and send a high-bitrate mp3 of the info via e-mail to all stations…then, if the EAS monitors have no or unintelligible audio, the Board Op could sound the Alert tones, play the mp3, and close out the Alert in short order.

Of course, this was considered too complicated – everyone buried their ears in the sand, and continue to rely on an EAS system that all-too-frequently doesn’t properly operate. It took me about ten minutes of self-instruction to learn how to record and e-mail a short audio clip, but that was too much to undertake.

Some things simply never change…..
 
I happened to be watching TV at the time the Amber Alert was issued. The first time down the pike, there was no audio. The second time audio was there, but very hard to hear.

I am going to agree with you that an overhaul of the system need some tweaks at least.

What would the EAS be if an earthquake rolled through the Sacramento area (not out of the realm of possibility, but likely rarer here as compared to San Francisco). Would the public be able to get the information needed for emergency help or relief? Just another aspect of the EAS that may not be implemented with the current system.

Hey, tornadoes are not out of the realm of possibility here either, though rare.

I was working at a station in Western Montana when Mount St. Helens blew in 1980. At first, the thought was the ash was not going to affect the area. After I saw the ash rolling over the mountains west of town (it appeared like the fog pouring over the hills in the Bay Area), I knew something was up. I alerted the local weather service, which was indeed monitoring it, and then they contacted the local Civil Defense authority. Still, it took NOAA along with my own personal observation to get the alert out. I bet it hasn't changed much today as it pertains to the current EAS.

I don't know what the answer to the Amber Alert system is, but if finger pointing, blaming others for mishaps, is going to be the norm, then the system will remain flawed.
 
It's completely unacceptable that the EAS/A.A. system is still using that kind of delivery, with all the means of communication we have now. The EAS alert should be set up to directly bypass any current programming on these designated stations and broadcast the information in clear, understandable audio. It shouldn't even go through a board-op!
 
Perhaps, Big D, the reason the EAS is handled as KFBK and other stations by live operators is exactly because the authorities, who have had this existing system forever, still can't get it right.

Don't get me wrong - the blame isn't always with official, non-radio agencies....I've seen even experienced board ops screw up EAS tests and actual alerts for decades. But when the system is working as far as the broadcast end is concerned, and all that gets aired are the EAS tones and then no/unintelligible audio, it's plain silly.

I realize my proposal of several years ago - to use e-mail backup of the EAS audio - would bypass some of the EAS monitors...but if the system is crippled by technical issues, and serving the public interest best is getting the info out on-air ASAP, so be it.

If EAS alerts were not an extremely important and serious function, the tests that air fairly regularly on most stations are, de facto, almost a joke. They should include some audio sent by the various reporting agencies, if for no other reason than to test the information processing functions of the system.

Plus, those stupid EAS printouts - sometimes unreadable because of faded/dead ink spools - are a near-complete waste of time.
Surely there must be a better system out there to broadcast alerts, present tests, and log the results.

Nitnitr, your points about getting follow up info - where the public can go for emergency services, etc. - are also spot on. I recognize that coordinating accurate emergency information seems a very difficult task. I will say I think kFBK has done some excellent work within their news broadcasts of covering many EAS situations - toxic spills, funnel clouds and the like. My problems lie in this topic with the all-too-frequent failures that can hinder real live emergencies.

I do remember one night when I was news anchor on at KFBK when an Amber Alert worked like on a drawing board. The EAS was transmitted to the monitor with excellent audio, the information broadcast in short order, and the victim was found safe and sound within 90 minutes. I cannot say it was KFBK's broadcast or another media outlet's that led to a tip that secured a young girl's safety, but I was informed by authorities after the fact that an EAS sparked a tip that worked.
 
BurnedOutOnTheBoards said:
I realize my proposal of several years ago - to use e-mail backup of the EAS audio - would bypass some of the EAS monitors...but if the system is crippled by technical issues, and serving the public interest best is getting the info out on-air ASAP, so be it.

Something very similar is how the upcoming CAP system will work. I forget which IP protocol they're using, but a digital file will be used. Whether that file will contain intelligible audio is up to the agency...

Your comment about KFBK's news department doing a good job in past emergencies is why stations need to have the option to NOT automatically relay EAS alerts. If KFBK's newsroom is already on the story & already broadcasting useful info, should the local EMA be able to interrupt that broadcast to transmit something KFBK's audience already knows?
 
As the vice-chair of the California State EAS Emergency Committee I'd like to know who at CHP was involved in the post mortem referred to in the posting on August 14:

The post-mortem meeting with EAS officials, CHP Brass, KFBK management, engineers, and others, was a classic finger pointer – “He didn’t do it.” I spoke up and suggested that the KFBK Control Room should have a computer/monitor with audio-to-the-air capability where, upon issuing an EAS Alert of any kind, the issuing authority should record their audio into a computer and send a high-bitrate mp3 of the info via e-mail to all stations…then, if the EAS monitors have no or unintelligible audio, the Board Op could sound the Alert tones, play the mp3, and close out the Alert in short order.


The Lt. in charge of AMBER at CHP says he did not know about the post mortem mentioned in the above posting.

Please reply to me off list.

Thanks and regards,

Richard Rudman
rar01 (at) mac (dot) com
 
Mr. Rudman,

I have replied off-line with my recollections of that meeting.......

But just to let our readers know, I can't remember the names of who I had lunch with last week, much less the names of CHP
officials I never heard of beforte or seen since from a meeting held in late 2004 or early 2005......The KFBK chief engineer was there, and probably has/had notes or minutes.

I am pleased that someone is looking into EAS problems both past and, hopefully, present. I've seen Amber Alerts work well, and the better they function, the more radio proves it still - at least some of the time - functions "in the public interest"...
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom