kenglish said:...NBC "Today Show" just played the whole thing this morning, including two-tone attention signals, duck-fart data, and part of the "message". Duh!
Trent said:I would be very curious as to whether this was a true hack or if it was more of a social engineering and/or inside job. Has anyone seen any more details on this?
Bill981 said:C'mon. How many broadcast reporters:
1. Actually know there are FCC Rules & Regulations.
2. Know the content that applies to them.
3. Actually care what happens to their affiliates?
The Commission should investigate that incident and cite every NBC affiliate that aired that portion of the Today show. Since they can't do anything to the network because they're not a licensee, let's take it out on the little guys who didn't even see it coming!
Lazy J said:...and to add insult to injury. The EAS obviously wasn't installed correctly because it should have cutoff the show audio while the EAS message is being aired.
Lazy J said:Personally, I think it was either a hoax or an inside job. Too many variables that couldn't be controlled by a hacker through a web interface. A hacked weekly test, sure. But a hacked civil emergency WITH AUDIO perfectly coordinated, nope... not buying it.
secondchoice said:IMHO: all Radio,TV, cable OTA operations (including EAS), electric, natural gas, and water / sewer utilities, and their distribution networks should be normally working with out any internet connection.
w9wi said:Now, one could argue whether internet-based CAP was a good idea...
OKCRadioGuy said:The feds investment is very little. Ours are 3,000 a box. And, still, we have a turd. Why can't they contract with a satellite-based internet provider (like Clear Channel's data system they use for emergencies to STL to towers after disasters) to PROPERLY distribute a private, secure message to us via CAP? The feds WASTE thousands of dollars a minute. Why are we burdened with a broken system we must try to maintain in spite of them if they cannot even give us a secure method of delivery?