At some point there has to be over saturation, with donations hitting a plateau. Once you've conquered, what's next?
If you use the Catholic church as a model, the next step is international. Other countries aren't as strict about foreign ownership.
At some point there has to be over saturation, with donations hitting a plateau. Once you've conquered, what's next?
The only way to really count is to state a location, such as in Denver itself or in a suburb or town within the Metro Survey Area, and see how many such stations have a truly usable signal in each one.Let's take a look at Denver.
89.7 - KXGR - "Grace FM", Calvary Chapel - a rimshot but easily received in Denver itself
91.1 - KLDV - K-Love +2 HD channels (rebroadcast at 103.9 and 98.1 respectively)
94.7 - KRKS-FM, Salem, preaching
95.1 + KLTT 670 - Crawford, preaching
98.1 - KLOVE 2000s translator (counted with KLDV-HD3) (this may be temporary)
101.1 HD-2 - KOSI-HD2, The Saints Channel, LDS
101.5 - KSRC, Star FM, Pillar of Fire
101.9 - KXWA, Way FM +HD-2 La Vida Unida (counting as 2 program sources)
102.7 + KPOF 910 - Pillar of Fire
103.9 - Air1 translator (counted with KLDV-HD2)
106.3 - "The Light", translator for KTLF Colorado Springs, also at 90.5 (counting both together as one source)
107.1 - KFCO, "Flo", Pillar of Fire
1060 - KRCN, Catholic Radio Network - kind of a rimshot, from Longmont
1120 - KCRN, Catholic Radio Network - rimshot from Limon
1220 - KLDC, Crawford, preaching
1340 - KDCO, El Sembrador Ministries, in Spanish
1510 - KPLS, Radio 74, Seventh-Day Adventist - currently off the air
1650 - KBJD, Salem, preaching
1690 - KDMT, Relevant Radio, Roman Catholic
Pillar of Fire, KDCO, and KTLF are local. KPLS is quasi-local.
I count 20 separate programming sources, but the counting gets complex: I counted AM + FM translator combinations as one, and counted translator/HD subchannel combinations as one, but counted the two Catholic Radio Network stations as separate due to the distance between them.
That seems rather a lot, no matter how you count.
Yes, I see that happening. However, Mexico and Canada would be difficult, where religious broadcasting has tough regulations against it.If you use the Catholic church as a model, the next step is international. Other countries aren't as strict about foreign ownership.
It depends. In some countries, there are strict limits on foreign ownership, ranging from 0% to majority positions.If you use the Catholic church as a model, the next step is international. Other countries aren't as strict about foreign ownership.
That's what I think I did; I am in Denver proper. (A combined city and county, for avoidance of doubt.)The only way to really count is to state a location, such as in Denver itself or in a suburb or town within the Metro Survey Area, and see how many such stations have a truly usable signal in each one.
But some are very strict about religious programming, even of a less hortatory nature than preaching. Canada used to be - not sure what the current status is; France still has restrictions of that type.If you use the Catholic church as a model, the next step is international. Other countries aren't as strict about foreign ownership.
But some are very strict about religious programming, even of a less hortatory nature than preaching. Canada used to be - not sure what the current status is; France still has restrictions of that type.
This gets to why I believe some have such a negative reaction to EMF and K-Love. Essentially, they used a loophole to build that empire: much looser limits on multiple station ownership and the former local studio rules by being a so-called educational organization. What they did was perfectly legal, and they are generally good about regulatory compliance. (So is iHeart.) But the fairness of that loophole was and is questionable. So often, evangelicals complain about being oppressed when they are criticized for taking advantage of special privileges, when the reality is that they've been getting preferential treatment all along. I'm not saying EMF has made those types of complaints, but the perception of unfairness hangs over what they've done. That's the price they're paying for their success, in my opinion. Yes, at some point, they will hit saturation. And monocultures have a tendency to deteriorate over time.K-Love, Inc. is the largest radio owner and operator with approximately 1,100 broadcast signals. iHeart is second with around 850.
Radio 74 has run into issues in France, and had to turn to more secular programming compared to its American operations.That probably wouldn't apply to something like K-Love that's mainly music.
What "loophole". In few markets have they had more than two stations, and a huge percentage of that 1,100 station count is composed of translators, not actual "stations".This gets to why I believe some have such a negative reaction to EMF and K-Love. Essentially, they used a loophole to build that empire: much looser limits on multiple station ownership and the former local studio rules by being a so-called educational organization. What they did was perfectly legal, and they are generally good about regulatory compliance. (So is iHeart.) But the fairness of that loophole was and is questionable.
The only "treatment" they get is being a non-commercial and non-profit entity, just like churches and the Red Cross.So often, evangelicals complain about being oppressed when they are criticized for taking advantage of special privileges, when the reality is that they've been getting preferential treatment all along.
What is "unfair" about owning one or two stations in each population area?I'm not saying EMF has made those types of complaints, but the perception of unfairness hangs over what they've done. That's the price they're paying for their success, in my opinion.
They are expanding their podcast options, Spanish language programming and local outreach. This is very much a company that is nowhere close to being complete or saturated.Yes, at some point, they will hit saturation. And monocultures have a tendency to deteriorate over time.
radioinsight.com
Until recently, the main studio rule. Even though that's not gone now, most of EMF's growth occurred while that was in place. The exemption to the main studio rule had good intentions, intended for truly educational networks and stations, and EMF abused the crap out of it. All perfectly legal but unfair even to commercial Christian broadcasters!What "loophole". In few markets have they had more than two stations, and a huge percentage of that 1,100 station count is composed of translators, not actual "stations".
A company ... that's very telling in and of itself.The only "treatment" they get is being a non-commercial and non-profit entity, just like churches and the Red Cross.
{...}
This is very much a company that is nowhere close to being complete or saturated.
Until recently, the main studio rule. Even though that's not gone now, most of EMF's growth occurred while that was in place. The exemption to the main studio rule had good intentions, intended for truly educational networks and stations, and EMF abused the crap out of it.
The main studio rule has not applied for a long time to non-commercial stations, I believe. In fact, it allowed for extensive public radio networks in stATES like Minnesota, IIRC. Is there some reason why a religious, faith-based station web should not enjoy the same priveledgrs?Until recently, the main studio rule.
Not for non-commercial stations, which included EMF.Even though that's not gone now, most of EMF's growth occurred while that was in place.
Why did they “abuse” the rule when it was written to apply to all kinds of non commercial stations, from college run sets of stations to PBS affiliates to EMF? The key there has been “not for profit” and not “any cause except faith based ones.”The exemption to the main studio rule had good intentions, intended for truly educational networks and stations, and EMF abused the crap out of it. All perfectly legal but unfair even to commercial Christian broadcasters!
“Company” means they are incorporated as opposed to a partnership or sole proprietorship. There are non-profit “companies” too. My mother spent about four decades on the board of the Cleveland Visiting Nurse Association, Inc. it was definitely non-profit, but was certainly legally incorporated about 70 years ago; incorporation simply protects the staff and officers from personal liabilityA company ... that's very telling in and of itself.
Many commercial operators “worship” the broadcaster formerly known as EMF because they have taken one or two viable FM stations out of many over radio markets at a time when revenue is declining. By reducing the number of commercial stations, what is left for the rest is divided into bigger pieces.Time to pull out this explainer I wrote in 2017...
![]()
EMF: Don’t Hate The Player, Hate The Game
I originally wrote this last September after the purchase of KSWD Los Angeles, but after today's purchase of 97.9 WLUPradioinsight.com
Waivers were always required, if I recall correctly.The main studio rule has not applied for a long time to non-commercial stations, I believe. In fact, it allowed for extensive public radio networks in stATES like Minnesota, IIRC.
There's what's legal and then there's what's fulfilling the intent of what's legal. It's just like the rules on "service animals" on airplanes. You can be compliant and still abuse the rules. Then you end up with pooping Dalmatians:Why did they “abuse” the rule when it was written to apply to all kinds of non commercial stations, from college run sets of stations to PBS affiliates to EMF? The key there has been “not for profit” and not “any cause except faith based ones.”
Isn't it the other way around?Not looking good for the future of commercial radio. AM is in hospice and FM is in the ICU.
The main studio rule has not applied for a long time to non-commercial stations, I believe. In fact, it allowed for extensive public radio networks in stATES like Minnesota, IIRC. Is there some reason why a religious, faith-based station web should not enjoy the same priveledgrs?