• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Empire State Building - climbers

This is a bit off-topic, in that it does not relate to the ESB, but to a discussion of "edgy" radio content and people taking health risks. About 20 years ago in Sacramento, station KDND 107.9, owned by Entercom, thought up a contest where listeners would compete to see who could drink the most amount of water without using the bathroom. The prize was a new Nintendo Wii, at the time, a very popular and expensive game system. The second place winner, a 28 year old mom of 3, trying to win the Nintendo for her kids, drank 2 gallons of water, before dropping out of the game. But she later complained of intense head pain, then collapsed and died. She was diagnosed with water intoxication, in which the excess water flooded her system, disrupted the electrolytes and sodium levels, and caused brain swelling. In the wrongful death lawsuit, her family was awarded $16 million.

In this case, the station and Entercom was found liable, because they had set up the contest, recruited the contestants, and had enticed them with a prize. Even when a nurse called in during the contest, warning of water intoxication, the DJ's kept the contest running. But -- this is not what happened with the ESB. They did not set up a contest, did not recruit daredevils, did not promise a prize, and wanted no involvement. This is the difference between these two situations.
ESB was not responsible for tempting the climbers. They did break through a security lock.
But KDND was found liable for what happened, 10 staff members were fired, and the station later surrendered their license.

Way off topic-- but this is why I don't like "edgy content" on radio. Some of it can become abusive and dangerous. ( I tend to avoid "morning zoo" shows with shock jocks, etc.).


 
There are too many poorly informed comments about these climbers from people who have not even watched a very well-produced, publicly available profile about them.
However, K.M.'s comments were based on local reliable and responsible news coverage.
Where is the outrage directed at the Empire State Building and its security protocols that allowed this to happen in the first place? There is practically no bigger terrorism target in the world than the Empire State Building, yet these two had no problem waltzing in and getting up to the top.
Yet the building is a business. They have to find a "sweet spot" between security and the ability to run the building on a day to day basis. If they "enhance" security too much, then the activities of tenants and visitors might be... probably would be... made impractically difficult.


If they had been stopped by security in the first place, we wouldn't be having this conversation. Frankly, NYC is extremely lucky the people who did this were carrying cameras, not bombs. But I guess it's charges for the people who did no real harm while the ESB management gets a free pass for its good luck.
Again, you are asking for impractical and intrusive security at a public building. If they add additional security measures beyond those already in effect, the rents would have to be increased to the point that tenants would move to some of the millions of square feet of vacant office space already courting them. Or to New Jersey, where all of a sudden a whole bunch of businesses are moving their offices.
You're the keyboard warrior making uninformed comments and saying you don't care so why should I care what you think of me?
K.M.'s remarks are based on local news media reports. Your comment is not warranted.
 


Back
Top Bottom