• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

energy 92.7

S

sfradio

is now with more power, is this that planned move thats on radio-locator?<P ID="signature">______________
xxnate_doggxx (at) myway (dot) com
</P>
 
> is now with more power, is this that planned move thats on
> radio-locator?
>
> Yes.
>
Still massive co-channel interference from KTOM here in Fremont. Nothing like dance and country cutting in and out......

500Watts from Sutro does seem to give more even coverage. I wonder what the in building coverage in SF is like now. I would bet it is a bit worse.

Kevin
 
Re: energy 92.7/KTOM

Some power. I still get KTOM in San Jose. It's worse than ever. In the mean time, just listen to the college stations for dance music until energy gets it right. Some suggested stations and shows are :
90.3 kusf Future breaks FM Saturdays 4p to 6p
90.1 kzsu The Big Love Show Mondays 2p to 5p
90.5 ksjs Bassline fm Saturdays 6p to 10p
 
92.7 KNGY

> Some power. I still get KTOM in San Jose. It's worse than
> ever. In the mean time, just listen to the college stations
> for dance music until energy gets it right. Some suggested
> stations and shows are :
> 90.3 kusf Future breaks FM Saturdays 4p to 6p
> 90.1 kzsu The Big Love Show Mondays 2p to 5p
> 90.5 ksjs Bassline fm Saturdays 6p to 10p
>

> http://radio-locator.com/cgi-bin/finder?call=KNGY&x=0&y=0&is_unl=Y&is_lic=Y&is_cp=Y&sr=Y&s=C&sid=




> http://www.fridaynightsession.com/

> http://www.live105.com/music/subsonic/default.htm

> http://www.betalounge.com/

> http://www.thumpradio.com/
 
Re: energy 92.7 - new antenna ?

> is now with more power, is this that planned move thats on
> radio-locator?
>
> Yes.
>

Saw the data on the CP for the antenna move on radio-locator's site... I was a bit puzzled by that. Map shows coverage area moves slightly southward... looks like a significant increase in elevation, but I'm reading 150 watts for the new location vs 3000 watts from the old antenna? Is this correct? Doesn't sound right to me.
 
Re: energy 92.7 - new antenna ?

"Saw the data on the CP for the antenna move on
radio-locator's site... I was a bit puzzled by that. Map
shows coverage area moves slightly southward... looks like a
significant increase in elevation, but I'm reading 150 watts
for the new location vs 3000 watts from the old antenna? Is
this correct? Doesn't sound right to me."

It's actually 510 watts from Sutro. What coverage is lost in power is made up for in the greatly increased elevation. It's a tricky process trying to get the most out of a non-mega signal, but you do whatever you can!
 
i live in diamond heights and never got 92.7 ... kjaz, kbtb, kngy, anything. the signal comes through now. it didn't before. it was weird. one day i was just scanning and it appeared. where was the tower before?

> > is now with more power, is this that planned move thats on
>
> > radio-locator?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> Still massive co-channel interference from KTOM here in
> Fremont. Nothing like dance and country cutting in and
> out......
>
> 500Watts from Sutro does seem to give more even coverage. I
> wonder what the in building coverage in SF is like now. I
> would bet it is a bit worse.
>
> Kevin
> <P ID="signature">______________
Will</P>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom