• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Engineering Discussions and Personal positions - A Hijack...

I restarted this based on my hijacked thoughts. Sorry everyone if your annoyed...

Chuck said:
<snip>

As I said, the group was fairly evenly divided. What struck me the most was the lack of religious fervor that I had detected in the past. The pro-HD group seemed mostly to be people who had something to sell. Even they were pretty quiet about it. The anti-HD group seemed more like "in the trenches" engineers, many of them from AM stations. The guys in the middle were currently running HD stations, and were doing whatever it took to get the job done. At least, they had the opportunity to upgrade their facilities as a result of HD, and that is not a bad thing.

You know, Chuck, I have found this set of feelings to be the case overall in the industry. I'm not in love with the technology. However I HAVE seen many new ideas ignored until it's too late. It's my perception that MOST radio people are a little skeptical, but afraid to "Miss the Boat". I know that's "MY" thought. I have become MUCH more of a believer based on the riff raff in here and the absurdity of their analysis.

I can see the FM folks who love Multicast. The AM folks are... Well the AM folks. We've already been left behind, and now we're trying to find a place in this "Brave New Radio World." I see AM HD as better sound. But I see the FM multicast as a greater threat than our substandard AM sound NOW. With 3 times the stations on the air in a short while (HD-2 and HD-3) , how long before all AMs which are successful get an FM-HD competitor? I work at an independant "Four letter network" sports station. And I'm not real thrilled that my network is on satellite. And the internet. And they have Pod Center. Etc.. etc.. Still, not counting live sports, we produce 5 hours of local content every day. That, along with rights fees and local broadcast production, is what we can sell.

This sounds crazy, but in the future, I can see "US" (As a stand alone AM) going to straight HD music (VERY LOW COST) and our FM compadres doing sports on W-Sports, W-Sports HD-2 and W-Sports HD-3. With the pile of cash we make on live sports gone, we'll be spinning the oldies in HD. And we'll still be on the bottom of the pile.


What's it they say in Second City???? OOOOOh That's Scary.


Clouseau
 
clouseau said:
IBut I see the FM multicast as a greater threat than our substandard AM sound NOW. With 3 times the stations on the air in a short while (HD-2 and HD-3) , how long before all AMs which are successful get an FM-HD competitor?

It might not be very long. Usually if a format is successful, it gets cloned. Why be original when you can rip off something that already works?

clouseau said:
I work at an independant "Four letter network" sports station. And I'm not real thrilled that my network is on satellite. And the internet. And they have Pod Center. Etc.. etc.. Still, not counting live sports, we produce 5 hours of local content every day. That, along with rights fees and local broadcast production, is what we can sell.

The local part is what can make you stand out. Of course, you know that. The question is could a new HD-2 station mess up your relationship with local sports teams? Local sports can be a fairly easy sell and a significant revenue generator. It also helps endear the station to the community.

I’ve often wondered how local NPR stations really felt when their network turned up one day on satellite.

clouseau said:
This sounds crazy, but in the future, I can see "US" (As a stand alone AM) going to straight HD music (VERY LOW COST) and our FM compadres doing sports on W-Sports, W-Sports HD-2 and W-Sports HD-3. With the pile of cash we make on live sports gone, we'll be spinning the oldies in HD. And we'll still be on the bottom of the pile.


What's it they say in Second City???? OOOOOh That's Scary.


Clouseau

It is not crazy, but it is scary...
 
I think it's very likely that in the future big FMs and small AMs could flip formats (again). Talk and news are THE MOST EXPENSIVE formats to do properly. Music is cheap. And if it sounds good, well...
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom