>>
> The difference between flying in a winged aircraft and not
> landing (thus avoiding clearing the customs procedure) and
> flying (and landing) in a helicopter with cooperation from
> the stations is considerable.
>
> The mystery continues, it seems.
>
I believe both flights were in helicopters. Correct me if I'm wrong, but there was some reference of Mr. Saxberg using a helicopter for his excursion as well.
The new documents are a long read, and do present some problems with the initial findings of Mr. Saxberg. It should be pointed out that he had no access to these sites, other than by air, and would have been denied access for his purposes even if he had asked for same. His mission was to proceed on the information he had at hand.
Larry Morton has been a consultant to Jaime Bonilla for more than ten years. He has assisted Mr. Bonilla on acquisitions and start ups in central California, and has worked on various antenna systems for the improvement of KURS. It would only make sense that he would be retained to respond to Mr. Saxberg's findings in vehement defense of his client.
There is much smoke and mirrors rhetoric contained in Mr. Morton's submission related to approval of his work by the Mexican government. By that I mean not that they agreed with his findings, but that he had documents approving his limited right to work in Mexico. Mr. Saxberg could not have acquired the approval of the Mexican government to do his work. It simply would not have been allowed, as Mr. Bonilla is well connected there, and Mr. Saxberg would have surely been denied a permit, as well as tipping his hand at his intentions. Mr. Morton goes on to reference his Professional Engineer status in the U.S. with some flourish, which is not to be discarded, but is really irrelevant to the question of competence of Mr. Saxberg, which is what is seemingly raised by the somewhat subtle satements made in Mr. Morton's filing regarding Mr. Saxberg.
The question remaining is simple. Are Mr. Bonilla's Mexican facilities operating as authorized? Regardless of anything occurring in the past, are these facilities now verifiably in legal operation?
I will state that I know both Mr. Morton and Mr. Saxberg, and that because I have a long history of working with Mr. Saxberg I harbor some bias in my opinions. As I stated in an earlier post regarding this matter, there are circumstances in which any one of us can err. There is no question in my mind that Mr. Saxberg would do anything that would not be representative of the highest ethical conduct or caliber of character and competence, nor would I suggest anything less of Mr. Morton. If the parties truly desire to come to the answers to these questions, then it is my suggestion that Mr. Saxberg should be allowed the same access to these facilities as that allowed Mr. Morton.
