Re: In defense of Jack Buck(Was Re: ESPN And MLB Renew Sunday-Night Baseball Deal
>
> I really don't think Joe Buck is that bad of an announcer.
> Perhaps people are unfairly comparing him to his father.
> They had somewhat different styles. I would put Buck in
> Costas' class, with a somewhat 'younger' take on the game
> (perhaps Buck overdoes pop-culture references where Costas
> only used them sparingly, but being 'media savvy' is a Fox
> prerequisite, I think...and besides, Al Michaels does far
> more of this on 'MNF' than he ever did in his baseball
> days).
> I think a lot of the criticism of Buck is undeserved, and is
> purely based on his being associated with that jackass
> McCarver. HE is the real problem with Fox's baseball
> coverage, so I guess Buck just has to suffer for being in
> the same booth.
>
Agreed, I don't find Buck annoying at all...it's not his fault McCarver is a blowhard. Unlike Thom Brenneman, Buck actually IMO has earned his spot on the basis of talent, rather than his last name.
>
> I really don't think Joe Buck is that bad of an announcer.
> Perhaps people are unfairly comparing him to his father.
> They had somewhat different styles. I would put Buck in
> Costas' class, with a somewhat 'younger' take on the game
> (perhaps Buck overdoes pop-culture references where Costas
> only used them sparingly, but being 'media savvy' is a Fox
> prerequisite, I think...and besides, Al Michaels does far
> more of this on 'MNF' than he ever did in his baseball
> days).
> I think a lot of the criticism of Buck is undeserved, and is
> purely based on his being associated with that jackass
> McCarver. HE is the real problem with Fox's baseball
> coverage, so I guess Buck just has to suffer for being in
> the same booth.
>
Agreed, I don't find Buck annoying at all...it's not his fault McCarver is a blowhard. Unlike Thom Brenneman, Buck actually IMO has earned his spot on the basis of talent, rather than his last name.