• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

espn on cbs?

why is it that cbs46 can simulcast the espn coverage of the falcons game tonight? same announcers, same EVERYTHING that they're running on espn.

i can understand say, abc and espn sharing broadcasts but im just baffled as to why cbs is getting to show it....
 
ESPN typically offers the OTA rights on games such as Thursday's to one local TV station. Apparently, 46 was interested and was first in line. This also happens during the first round of the MLB playoffs when ESPN is televising the Braves, OTA rights are offered to the first station willing to step up. Last year, WTBS carried the games locally but blacked them out on the national "TBS Superstation" feed.

> why is it that cbs46 can simulcast the espn coverage of the
> falcons game tonight? same announcers, same EVERYTHING that
> they're running on espn.
>
> i can understand say, abc and espn sharing broadcasts but im
> just baffled as to why cbs is getting to show it....
>
 
> ESPN typically offers the OTA rights on games such as
> Thursday's to one local TV station. Apparently, 46 was
> interested and was first in line. This also happens during
> the first round of the MLB playoffs when ESPN is televising
> the Braves, OTA rights are offered to the first station
> willing to step up. Last year, WTBS carried the games
> locally but blacked them out on the national "TBS
> Superstation" feed.
>
> > why is it that cbs46 can simulcast the espn coverage of
> the
> > falcons game tonight? same announcers, same EVERYTHING
> that
> > they're running on espn.
> >
> > i can understand say, abc and espn sharing broadcasts but
> im
> > just baffled as to why cbs is getting to show it....
> >
>

plus this game would be considered an AFC game and since CBS has the AFC package, it would make sense that the pre-season games would be offered first to the station in the market that carries the AFC normally.

I would think the pecking order for an ESPN/AFC pre-season game would be as follows....

1) CBS 46
2) 11 Alive
3) Fox 5
4) WSB<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
 
> > ESPN typically offers the OTA rights on games such as
> > Thursday's to one local TV station. Apparently, 46 was
> > interested and was first in line. This also happens during
>
> > the first round of the MLB playoffs when ESPN is
> televising
> > the Braves, OTA rights are offered to the first station
> > willing to step up. Last year, WTBS carried the games
> > locally but blacked them out on the national "TBS
> > Superstation" feed.
> >
> > > why is it that cbs46 can simulcast the espn coverage of
> > the
> > > falcons game tonight? same announcers, same EVERYTHING
> > that
> > > they're running on espn.
> > >
> > > i can understand say, abc and espn sharing broadcasts
> but
> > im
> > > just baffled as to why cbs is getting to show it....
> > >
> >
>
> plus this game would be considered an AFC game and since CBS
> has the AFC package, it would make sense that the pre-season
> games would be offered first to the station in the market
> that carries the AFC normally.
>
> I would think the pecking order for an ESPN/AFC pre-season
> game would be as follows....
>
> 1) CBS 46
> 2) 11 Alive
> 3) Fox 5
> 4) WSB
>


But does not the right reverse to the opposite network in a intra-conference game? I thought that if the game is a home AFC team vs. a visiting NFC game then the broadcast partner would FOX and if it was the opposite (NFC Home vs. AFC Away) then the broadcast is CBS?

Take a look at the following upcoming 2005 announced "National" NFL schedule:

Sunday, Sept. 11 Dallas at San Diego (4:15 p.m. ET, FOX)
Sunday, Sept. 18 Cleveland at Green Bay (4:15 p.m. ET, CBS)
Sunday, Oct. 2 Dallas at Oakland (4:15 p.m. ET, FOX)
Sunday, Oct. 23 Denver at New York Giants (4:15 p.m. ET, CBS)
Sunday, Oct. 30 Philadelphia at Denver (4:15 p.m. ET, FOX)
Sunday, Nov. 6 Pittsburgh at Green Bay (4:15 p.m. ET, CBS)
Thursday, Nov. 24 Denver at Dallas (4 p.m. ET, CBS)
Sunday, Dec. 11 Kansas City at Dallas (4:15 p.m. ET, CBS)
Saturday, Dec. 17 Kansas City at New York Giants (5 p.m. ET, CBS)
 
I think it reverses each year. Next year AFC intra-conferance home games wil be on CBS. Same for NFC on Fox. 2007 will be like this year. I think that is how it works.
<P ID="signature">______________
In Harmony
From the Bop Shop,
Brian "BD Bopper"</P>
 
> I think it reverses each year. Next year AFC
> intra-conferance home games wil be on CBS. Same for NFC on
> Fox. 2007 will be like this year. I think that is how it
> works.
>

No, it doesn't work that way. The network with that conference's rights carries the visitors' game. Visiting NFC teams are always on FOX, and visiting AFC teams are always on CBS. That's why the Dallas/Oakland game is on FOX instead of CBS. It's worked that way for years...occasionally (when NBC had the AFC and CBS had the NFC) you'd see NBC carry Oakland or Houston games when they visited Texas Stadium, and the same for when Dallas would visit Cleveland or Miami.

It's been this way for at least 30 years, maybe longer.<P ID="signature">______________
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." - Robert Heinlein

dan</P>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom