• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Fantastic word game

"Have a Cigar" is the only Pink Floyd song not sung by a member of Pink Floyd.

It was sung by Roy Harper, who is immortalized in the awful Led Zeppelin song "Hats Off to Roy Harper."

And once again, I'm AWOL and andrea shows up. It's possible that we are one in the same person and just don't know it. Kinda like that movie with that guy from the TV show. Yeah, that one.
 
quadraphonic said:
Church music would never be the same, but I think Petra and Stryper gave the light show thing a good run.
Click to expand...

A good run with me will do any man a WORLD of good....
 
Since I don't understand quad's post, I'm hijacking it and continuing on using andrea's clue:


Good thing none of us are in andrea's world in real life or we'd never survive.


And I mean that in a good way.
 
WMC2006 said:
Since I don't understand quad's post, I'm hijacking it and continuing on using andrea's clue:


Good thing none of us are in andrea's world in real life or we'd never survive.


And I mean that in a good way.
Click to expand...

We'd never survive sounds like one of those quotes put together by people who don't realize the value of a good woman...
 
Woman folk here at TFWG tell me they were able to understand quad's last post even if it was a bit disjointed so I think WMC owes him an apology and should serve a self imposed time out for a premature and unwarranted hijacking.
 
quadraphonic said:
Good thing for the cardiovascular system, but not so much for the joints, that running.
Click to expand...


I still don't understand the post at all and I've looked at it several times but I will take the timeout (easy enough since I'm heading to work anyway) and I apologize to quad, but it looks to me like a half-sentence, something is missing, or something. Just something. Makes zero sense. It's not a sentence so it's not unwarranted. Someome please splain it to me.


A premature and unwarranted hijacking is not something you see every day here at TFWG but there I was, moments after quad posted, and his post made zero sense and so, therefore, I had to make the executive decision that I made.
 
"I had to make the executive decision that I made" is the excuse WMC offers for his transgression and yet upon further review by an assembly of his TFWG peers, that decision was found to be baseless and without merit.
 
Baseless and without merit is not how I would put it, but I will have to go against WMC as well.

Sorry big guy. Hey, at least we're not giving you the Phil Leotardo at the gas station treatment.

The sentence could be arranged to read "That running [is] good for the cardiovascular system but not so much for the joints." It's kind of a colloquial phrasing on the order of "That Wilson boy is some kind of hellion." And while I'm against implied subjects and verbs (in this case, the "is" is missing), linguistic purity packed her bag and left these parts about 8,900 posts ago.
 
As well as I could make it fit was the plight of that disjointed sentence I had to construct to lead the next sentence joiner in our quest to Page 1000.

Yeah it was colloquial. Lots of times old people seem to speak like that [especially in old movies] when they are talking about the past or people in it. And yeah, it had an implied verb and the subject was out of the usual order, but sometimes you just gotta be flexible. Linguistics allows for that.
If I was a girl.... ;)
 


Back
Top Bottom