• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Fantastic word game

I did not find my spectacles this mornin', n' I'm havin' to re-do this here contribution 'cuz now I done missed the bolded "I" in the latest offering from the Padre.

The other'n wudn't no better, anyways. It's gonna be a demerit-filled day, I reckon, in the land o' the Lone Star.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In the latest offering from the Padre (who usually goes by dmargalotti), we see a reference to security breaches, something taken very seriously by TFWG management.
 
TFWG management is probably casting a wary eye up this way right now, seeing as how I was the first to bring up security breaches and management already considers me evil.
 
Orchestra and band are two popular classes over at PowerWorld University (PU as many of the kids prefer) as is an elective class that, this semester, asks the age-old question "Why did CT bold only half of the clue in Post #51,927?"

Looks like the DoL needs to demeritize himself.
 
Post #51,927 is evidence that CT, as Director of Linguistics, has committed a linguistic felony.

And that is something that is taken very seriously here in TFWG-land, especially when it's coming from the DoL.
Demeritize? What sort of word is that? That should make someone's cranium explode!!
😆
 
Last edited:
Record that linguistic felony on CT's permanent record which will be there for all the world to see if someone hacks into it.

My original contribution except that dmargalotti got his in seconds before mine:
A linguistic felony is an extremely serious charge that usually ends up in the hands of those elderly gents who make up the PowerWorld Board of Governors (PWBG as they do not prefer).

Well, Ed, I brought up 'demeritize' and my cranium is fine. Plus, cranium explosions generally occur with gameplay stuff, not dialogue stuff. So I'm good. But thanks for your thoughts. :LOL::p
 
Record that offense as a linguistic misdemeanor and clear my record, as there were several mitigating factors.

Under Vermont law, any offense committed under the influence of fewer than three gummies is considered a misdemeanor.

UPDATE: *&%$#! WMC got in a split second before me, but this one is so good that I'm just going to leave it here and let you all decide which one you want to continue from. After all, whatever I do here is just a misdemeanor.
 
The Linguistics Correctional Facility would house a few o' us, fer sure, but the pack leader on the cellblock at the Punctuation Prison would come by way o' Worcester, Massachusetts.

If'n it were me in there, I sure as dickens wouldn't get caught in the showers alongside the Crafty Comma (who gets dis-respected n' ignored regularly), Bastardly Bracket, Sinister Semicolon, or the Evil Ellipsis. From the look in the eye o' that Dastardly Dash, over yonder in the corner, someone's danglin' participle might just be in danger.

Edit to add: Are we just thumbin' our collective noses at #51,933 which, honestly, was the last valid play? Padre? Scanman? Ed??? Ok, then. I won't tell him, if'n y'all don't. Let's just see what happens.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Worcester, Massachusetts is probably not pronounced how you think it is unless you are from there.

RCM, I made an executive decision to use CT's ending clue since there were two posts that simultaneously posted. The PowerWorld Courts have traditionally upheld similar decisions in the past. However, you of course are entitled to file an appeal if you so choose. Please know, if your appeal is denied, you will be responsible for all court costs and legal fees.
 
There will be no further questions from the hayloft, yer Honor (Honour, as Mister Ed likely prefers), n' the critter delegation rests its case.

If'n ignorin' a contribution from the former Game Czar is yer executive call, who am I to question it n' garner any more disfavor (disfavour, again fer the same reason stated above) from the pulpit?

Crackin' open 'nother tallboy n' carryin' on...

It's pro-nounced Woo-ster, ain't it? That's sure 'nuff how Go-rilla Monsoon used to say it.
 


Back
Top Bottom