• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

FCC acting on AM applications (attn: Mike O)

After more than two years a few applications filed during
the AM Major Filing Window have been approved around the
country. In Texas KBBW 1010 got the okay to change from
ID'ing as "Waco-Marlin" to simply "Waco" and a new station
on 1140 has been approved in Shallowwater (near Lubbock).

In the Houston area the path has been cleared for KHCB
1400 Galveston to move to League City, using a directional
antenna system. The major obstacle was co-channel (and
co-owned) KHCH Huntsville, which has been allowed to
change frequency to 1410. Although that change was okayed
the KHCB application has yet to be approved.

Also waiting for approval are applications to move Roy
Henderson's KNUZ 1090 Bellville to Katy and one to move
KRCM 1380 from Beaumont to Shenandoah, as well as a new
station on 1210 in Bay City.
 
Re: R I G H T!

Well here we go........my first post in a long time. This is a big hot button for me. The fact is, the FCC is FINALLY beginning to inch forward on just the tip of the stack of Auction 84 applicaitions. The KBBW (Waco-Marlin to just Waco) grant is an example of just how ridiculously slow this process is. All KBBW asked for was to drop Marlin from its dual city of license. This will allow it to make some daytime improvements (and perhaps even some night changes as well). No fuss, no deeply entangling technical issues...and N O T H I N G from the FCC for more than TWO years! Shameful! Meanwhile, there are nearly TWO THOUSAND applications still sitting with nothing happening. It's no wonder that they say, "at the FCC, a year is as a day." At this rate, it will be another five to seven YEARS before all these applications are disposed of. That's right, the year 2011 or even 2012 to act on applications filed in January, 2004. There might be a slower, more expensive, less efficient way of doing things but I can't imagine what it would be.

The current auction plan is resulting in reports that the Commission's staff is getting a MONTH further behind in processing applications for each WEEK that goes by. This may seem unbelievable but given the history that has been established since the auction process went into place more than six years ago, it's probably accurate. FCC Docket: 05-210 which proposes to make "City of License" requests a MINOR change as opposed to a MAJOR change (which will include FM rulemakings that now take up to two years or more) will help if it is adopted but that rulemaking has been pending since last June and no one knows when it will be acted upon.

You mentioned a couple of other interesting local applications. First, Roy Henderson's KNUZ moving from Bellville to Katy. That application is D E A D and will not happen. Here's why:

On March 21st, in a letter signed by Mass Media Bureau Chief Peter Doyle, the FCC dismissed a similar application for station WLDR licensed to Kingsley, Michigan [Ironically, owned by Roy Henderson as well] (population: 1,469) which proposed to change the station's city of license to Garfield Township, Michigan (population: 13,840). WLDR AM is the only station licensed to Kinglsey. Garfield Township is part of the Traverse City, MI metro (ARB Market #209 with a pop of 194,000). The letter stated that Henderson's proposal for WLDR did not pass Section 307(b) muster in that it would deny Kingsley its already licensed First (and only) Service. The letter stated in part: "While Garfield Township is unquestionably the larger community, and would be preferred if this were a comparison between proposals for new service, this in and of itself does not justify the change of community of license that would deprive the community of Kinglsey of a radio service...."

The "Bigger City" justification was used in a large number of proposed moves in this auction and this letter serves notice on virtually all of those applications which still await action (see above) that they will be dismissed........which includes Henderson's proposed move from Bellville (population: 3,378) to Katy (population: 8,005). Besides, Henderson still has many wolves at the door visa vie KNUZ. There were a number of Petitions to Deny his license renewal last year (which is still pending) from folks in Bellville who feel they haven't been very well served by their local radio station (go figure......the station has been off the air more than it has been on the air for as long as Henderson as owned it).

The application you mentioned on KHCB from Galveston to League City is interesting in that if granted, it will be one of only a handfull of DIRECTIONAL Class "C" (the old Class IV) stations in the country. The old Class IV's are 1230kHz, 1240kHz, 1340kHz, 1400kHz, 1450kHz, and 1490kHz. KHCB of course, is on 1400kHz and is the old KILE of decades ago. This station had a rich history and was the original station for several Houston radio personalities including the likes of Pat Fant of KTRH/KLOL (and lately, Cumulus) fame. This is perhaps the most interesting proposed AM move since 1560khz and 900kHz both arrived 1997. It will be interesting to see if this Directional Antenna is granted.

Incidentally, neither the KRCM move from Beaumont to Shenandoah nor the KHCB move from Galveston to League City are implicated in the same 307(b) problems as KNUZ because they each propose to move stations from cities with multiple stations licensed to them (Beaumont: 12 stations before, 11 after and Galveston: 3 before and 2 after) to cities that currently have no "local" service.

And finally..................will everybody PLEASE.....finally forget the application for 1210kHz in Bay City? That application was filed as part of the break up of the clear channels (NOT Clear Channel the company) way back in 1982. It conflicted with an application on the same frequency down in the Valley at San Juan. The San Juan application won out and eventually became KUBR AM. For reasons unknown to me to this day, the 1210kHz application at Bay City became stuck in the FCC's database and stayed there for nearly two decades. I just checked the FCC's Audio Division AM database and it is no longer there.

Ironically, there is an AM application that is active in Bay City. It specifies the facilities of the old KFCC on 1270kHz. Remember, KFCC was the station that had its license yanked after the licensee got into a catfight with the Commission over relicensing the station to Missouri City. Big FCC won the fight, little KFCC is gone. Never a good idea to take a knife to a gunfight.

This application is also very interesting in that it conflicts with a MINOR CHANGE application by 1280kHz, KWHI in Brenham prior to the Auction 84 deadline to increase power to 10,000 watts and install a directional antenna system that would put a 5 mV/m contour over most of Houston. These minor change applications were supposed to be protected by Auction 84 applicants but there is a twist here that would make for one more interesting chapter in the 1270 @ Bay City saga. The applicant for the "new" station on 1270kHz in Bay City has filed a Petition to Deny the KWHI application and stands on a unanimous vote of the full Commission in the KFCC case to preserve the 1270kHz allocation to Bay City. The Bay City applicant says Auction 84 was the first opportunity for anyone to apply for the old KFCC facilities. He says KWHI should have known of the preservation of the 1270kHz allocation at Bay City and should have protected it with their application. As a result, he claims he is first in line to use the spectrum ahead of KWHI. Might work. Looks like KWHI may be the loser here.

There..............I've vented...........I feel much better.
 
Re: R I G H T!

> There..............I've vented...........I feel much better.
>

Outstanding post Tony. Thanks!

One question for you ---

Wouldn't a KHCB-1400 move to League City cause first-adjacent harm to KULP-1390 to the east and southeast of El Campo where KULP is located?

I have family east of there in Fort Bend County who listen to KULP and really like the station.
 
KHCB versus KULP

The answer is "Yes" there would be an increase in overlap IF KHCB were to remain non-directional. BUT the two-tower DA was proposed to fix that problem. It is a wide spaced two tower which creates a north/south peanut shaped pattern with a null of approximately 120 watts toward El Campo. If anything, the grandfathered overlap between the two stations should be dramatically improved. Remember, the old Class IV's began life as 100 watts stations (day and night). After the end of World War II (1947), all the Class IV's (except those near the Canadian Border) were allowed to got to 250 watts fulltime. In 1963, they were allowed to increase daytime power to 1000 watts while the nights were still limited to 250 watts. Then in 1983, they were allowed 1000 watts both day and night.

Many of these changes came at the expense of increased overlap to both co-channel and adjacent channel stations which had no choice but to accept the new overlap when the power increases came on the Class IV's.

In the case of KULP and KHCB, the currently licensed .5 mV/m to .5 mV/m overlap is about 1,700 square miles. As proposed with the Directional Antenna (DA) for KHCB, that overlap is reduced to about 700 square miles, an improvement of nearly 60%.

The improvements to KHCB have taken a great deal of time and thought. Buying and moving the Class IV in Hunstsille to 1410 kHz (a frequency available there due to the death of the AM Cleveland a number of years ago) is all part of what will be a big improvement in the use of the spectrum once the CP for KHCB is granted and built.
 
Re: FCC acting on AM applications (attn: jd)

> After more than two years a few applications filed during
> the AM Major Filing Window have been approved around the
> country. In Texas KBBW 1010 got the okay to change from
> ID'ing as "Waco-Marlin" to simply "Waco" and a new station
> on 1140 has been approved in Shallowwater (near Lubbock).
>
> In the Houston area the path has been cleared for KHCB
> 1400 Galveston to move to League City, using a directional
> antenna system. The major obstacle was co-channel (and
> co-owned) KHCH Huntsville, which has been allowed to
> change frequency to 1410. Although that change was okayed
> the KHCB application has yet to be approved.
>
> Also waiting for approval are applications to move Roy
> Henderson's KNUZ 1090 Bellville to Katy and one to move
> KRCM 1380 from Beaumont to Shenandoah, as well as a new
> station on 1210 in Bay City.
>
JD, Thanks for the info. I looked at the 301 long form for KBBW and their plans are to engineer a new nighttime pattern that will cover the city of Waco as the old pattern only covers ~50% of the Waco city limits today. That means they will scrap the signal that heads straight into Houston at night. There was no mention of any daytime changes, but I would imagine that since KBBW no longer needs to serve Marlin the powerful signal into Houston will be eliminated or at least greatly reduced in this direction. It would be to KBBW's benefit to greatly reduce the signal into Houston during the day and end the significant overlap of signals and score some "points" with the FCC in favor of any new nighttime pattern that serves Waco 100%.

When the survey was done for the Major Modification Application it was discovered that KBBW sends more power into Houston than had been previously estimated. I still don't know how the FCC ever approved the two stations for 10kW {KBBW} and 5kW {KLAT} and patterns that did not protect each other, especialy KBBW which sends probably the equivalent of 25kW into Houston during the day. Hopefully KBBW will engineer a new day and night pattern soon and end the interference to KLAT.

The FCC is taking it's time on the Major Mod Auction of 2004. I believe that both KNUZ and KRCM will be approved for the new cities requested. KRCM would have been smarter to request The Woodlands as Community of Licence and not Shenandoah, but the FCC will likely approve the move. Henderson has broken nearly ever Regulation there is, but he always seems to get what he requests, so I would expect that KNUZ will move from Belleville to Katy. The FCC does not seem to be as conoerned about first aural service when it comes to AM assignments.

Possible good news is that the FCC will scrap the Table of Allotments for FM totally. This will end the fighting over the more deserving COL, etc. It may even speed up the process by five years. I don't see it helping Houston any as long as current spacing requirements are in affect as there is no place on the dial for a station to move to from outside of Houston, without some major shifts of stations frequencies. With the FM dial so crowded I don't know of any frequencies a station could move to without a major domino effect.

Possibly the FCC will realign the frequencies of some stations to make room for more stations, but not likely and very remote is ease the Regulations on spacing for stations that serve the Houston area on the "in" signal. Maintain the same spacing for the station to other stations outside of Houston, but within the metro Houston area allow short spacing of signals. Far fetched and unlikely.

On KHCB 1400 League City the FCC as the Application listed as "Blocked" "Other Hold", have no idea what the hell that means other than the FCC doesn't know what to do either and just placed the App on hold. There is not another Class C station in the US to my knowledge that has a directional pattern day and night. The pattern would be sending more than 1000 watts over Houston and Galveston at night which would be taboo under todays Regulations (I think}. It also would open up a real can of worms with many stations applying for a directional pattern 24/7 to better cover their COL.

I can't find anyone that has applied for the 1210kHz Bay City station, but 1270 ex KFCC has been applied for with the same parameters and towers as the old 1270 in Bay City. Antonio Nassar of Stafford, TX has applied for 1270 with 1000 watts directional at night. I wonder if KWHI 1280 and their App for 10kW daytime over Houston will muddy the waters on this App for Bay City? I believe that KWHI filed the App just to stop the possiblity of a 1270 in Bay City and have no intention of serving Houston or KWHI would have filed for a Major Mod during the window to move in closer to Houston, like Sugar Land. I know that KWHI filed Objections to KFCC moving from Bay City to Missouri City, even though the pattern from Missouri City would have afforded KWHI more protection than they currently had with 1kW ND from Bay City. I expect that KWHI will fight the 1270 App for Bay City.

KILE 1560 saga still continues. I wish the FCC would give them a damn nighttime license and be done with it. God knows Bob Morrow the Technical Dirrector for RAFTT has put together some excellent packages to the FCC and left no stone unturned. Hopefully RAFTT's latest App for 1kW night will be approved. There was no reason for the 25kW App not to be approved a few years ago, except it had too much power over Cuba, BFD, Cuba purposely blocks US stations and the US is concerned about a treaty "NARBA" that no one else even recognizes any longer.

For Bob Morrow; WKAT 1360 North Miami recently filed for 50kW day and night and the FCC threw back the Application because it sent too much power over Cuba and might cause interference to a 10kw station on 1360 that is non direcitional and probably causing WKAT interference in Miami. At the least WKAT was probably trying regain some ground lost by the Cuban day and night. The new pattern WKAT had to engineer does not cover Miami with a City Grade signal any longer. I do not understand the FCC not standing up for the rights of US stations, but falling back on a treaty with a country that does not and never has recognized that treaty. I would think if the FCC had any sense they would treat Cuba as if it were a body of water and not concern themselves with what power levels US stations send in that direction. If it comes to a power war, the US can blow them out of the ocean with much higher powered stations, something that should have been done years ago. Florida stations have suffered for years because the FCC has done nothing to give them the power needed to overcome Cuban interference. Let Florida and any affected station run what ever power is needed to have a clean clear signal in their coverage area, even if it is 250kW.

RAFTT has also applied to move 1550 KWBC from Navasota to College Station with 1.4kW directional daytime and 24 watts non directional nights. If this isn't approved I will wonder if there isn't a problem between the FCC and RAFTT.

Thanks again JD for the heads up, I have been working on a project that was going to last for two weeks that started over a month ago and I'm not half finished and have missed a lot of what has been going on with other stations.

Mike O
 
Hate to chime in on this old topic, but I have been out of the loop for awhile and finally read the good news about KNUZ from JD. For those that don't know, I run a part-15 carrier current station called Cat-AM out of Cat Spring, Texas. Just an FYI, Henderson is trying to get back in the commisions graces again, going out and broadcasting the local high school football games live, but in my opinion this is just another one of Hendersons many faces and too little, too late. Being from Bellville, and already having the support of many locals (some of which are in the petitions), and I would gladly assume the KNUZ license if the commision granted it. I have been in informal talks with two members of the EDC about this very thing, and could quickly bring the station back up to genuinely serving this community. I know the FCC has the power to do this, ie; reassign a license to someone else, but I do not think it has ever been done, at least to my knowledge. If someone from the commision happens to read this, I still have the towers, the engineering, and the finances to bring 1090 back to what it was pre-Henderson...

Tom Johnson
CAT-AM 580
 
Ultanium said:
I know the FCC has the power to do this, ie; reassign a license to someone else, but I do not think it has ever been done, at least to my knowledge. If someone from the commision happens to read this, I still have the towers, the engineering, and the finances to bring 1090 back to what it was pre-Henderson...

Good luck. This happens rarely, but I'd love to see it happen in many cases now. Especially to the Clear Channels of the world that buy up multiple stations.
 
I hear ya' and feel the same way...

Tom Johnson
CAT-AM 580
 
And finally..................will everybody PLEASE.....finally forget the application for 1210kHz in Bay City? That application was filed as part of the break up of the clear channels (NOT Clear Channel the company) way back in 1982. It conflicted with an application on the same frequency down in the Valley at San Juan. The San Juan application won out and eventually became KUBR AM. For reasons unknown to me to this day, the 1210kHz application at Bay City became stuck in the FCC's database and stayed there for nearly two decades. I just checked the FCC's Audio Division AM database and it is no longer there.

Ironically, there is an AM application that is active in Bay City. It specifies the facilities of the old KFCC on 1270kHz. Remember, KFCC was the station that had its license yanked after the licensee got into a catfight with the Commission over relicensing the station to Missouri City. Big FCC won the fight, little KFCC is gone. Never a good idea to take a knife to a gunfight.

AM 1210 was actually the original channel assignment for the former WKNX in Frankenmuth, Michigan. The station had originally been licensed to Saginaw as part of a pairing with then-CBS TV affiliate WEYI. The station was later spun off and the COL assigned to Frankenmuth. Bell Broadcasting of Detroit (then-owners of the legendary WCHB and WJZZ) bought WKNX in the late 90's with the intent of shutting it off so they could double WCHB's (1200 AM) then-25,000 watt signal. One of the WKNX DJ's, a fellow by the name of John Blehm, then bought the station (dba Frankenmuth Broadcasting) with the understanding that he was going to have to find a new frequency by a certain date. Enter WXOX (AM 1250) in Bay City, which had been the former sister of WXIX-FM in Essexville until for whatever reason, they went dark. Frankenmuth Broadcasting was successful at getting the 1250 frequency, but I believe they ran into financial troubles when they moved their studios north to Saginaw, which is likely why they sold it to Bay City CBS affiliate WNEM-TV later on. The station now bills itself as Newsradio 1250.
 
I have no idea if this has anything to do with the impending move of KRCM to The Woodlands area or not, but I noticed today that they were not simulcasting their normal KOLE morning show on KRCM. Instead, we were treated to Mancow!
 
kenhawk1160 said:
And finally..................will everybody PLEASE.....finally forget the application for 1210kHz in Bay City? That application was filed as part of the break up of the clear channels (NOT Clear Channel the company) way back in 1982. It conflicted with an application on the same frequency down in the Valley at San Juan. The San Juan application won out and eventually became KUBR AM. For reasons unknown to me to this day, the 1210kHz application at Bay City became stuck in the FCC's database and stayed there for nearly two decades. I just checked the FCC's Audio Division AM database and it is no longer there.

Ironically, there is an AM application that is active in Bay City. It specifies the facilities of the old KFCC on 1270kHz. Remember, KFCC was the station that had its license yanked after the licensee got into a catfight with the Commission over relicensing the station to Missouri City. Big FCC won the fight, little KFCC is gone. Never a good idea to take a knife to a gunfight.

AM 1210 was actually the original channel assignment for the former WKNX in Frankenmuth, Michigan. The station had originally been licensed to Saginaw as part of a pairing with then-CBS TV affiliate WEYI. The station was later spun off and the COL assigned to Frankenmuth. Bell Broadcasting of Detroit (then-owners of the legendary WCHB and WJZZ) bought WKNX in the late 90's with the intent of shutting it off so they could double WCHB's (1200 AM) then-25,000 watt signal. One of the WKNX DJ's, a fellow by the name of John Blehm, then bought the station (dba Frankenmuth Broadcasting) with the understanding that he was going to have to find a new frequency by a certain date. Enter WXOX (AM 1250) in Bay City, which had been the former sister of WXIX-FM in Essexville until for whatever reason, they went dark. Frankenmuth Broadcasting was successful at getting the 1250 frequency, but I believe they ran into financial troubles when they moved their studios north to Saginaw, which is likely why they sold it to Bay City CBS affiliate WNEM-TV later on. The station now bills itself as Newsradio 1250.

Uh...Bay City, Texas...not Bay City, Michigan.
 
Hate to chime in on this old topic, but I have been out of the loop for awhile and finally read the good news about KNUZ from JD. For those that don't know, I run a part-15 carrier current station called Cat-AM out of Cat Spring, Texas. Just an FYI, Henderson is trying to get back in the commisions graces again, going out and broadcasting the local high school football games live, but in my opinion this is just another one of Hendersons many faces and too little, too late. Being from Bellville, and already having the support of many locals (some of which are in the petitions), and I would gladly assume the KNUZ license if the commision granted it. I have been in informal talks with two members of the EDC about this very thing, and could quickly bring the station back up to genuinely serving this community. I know the FCC has the power to do this, ie; reassign a license to someone else, but I do not think it has ever been done, at least to my knowledge. If someone from the commision happens to read this, I still have the towers, the engineering, and the finances to bring 1090 back to what it was pre-Henderson...



I take it you didn't get enough of Roy E. when you and your band of misfits petitioned the FCC to take away the license of KNUZ. It would've probably helped your cause had you actually solicited citizens of Bellville to help you get the application denied, instead of a bunch of kids that had no idea what they were even sending. How do you explain letters coming in from parts of Houston that couldn't hear 1090 if they stood on their rooftops rolled in aluminum foil and holding an antenna in each hand? I had the chance to read these "local" petitions. "We got to save our rock, and because our station left us, we want to steal this little 250w daytimer to give us our rock back". Letters from Baytown and Pasadena in support of a small Austin County (nowhere near either city) radio station that was supposed to serve their need for a dead format? Maybe it would be wise to save what face you currently have with your "array" of towers and apply for your own license instead of trying to steal someone else's.
 
Ouch, sounds like somebody is a little upset that they are going to lose. Steal a license huh, well if the license holder would have fulfilled his obligation to the community and actually played by the rules, the commision would have never had to intervene. Believe it or not, there are people out here in the real world who think radio station licenses should not be commodity to help fatten someones pockets. As to the comment about citizens of Bellville and Austin county, they have no idea the station exists anymore thanks to current ownership, hell the station was off for a year! I have no control over who petitioned, nor what they said, get a life... I worked at KACO back in 1982 and 1983, and it was a big part of this community, but thanks to current ownership it is nothing more than a little shack at the bottom of Dinah's tower, full of cobwebs and a console that doesn't even work... BTW, you sound amazingly like Henderson daughter, if so, you should be really proud Daddy squats on licenses, pretending to be a broadcast mogul, so you can have a job.

Tom
 
You had no control over what was submitted to the FCC? I know of a little website that I could copy your very words from where you were soliciting their members to submit these applications to deny on your behalf so that you could seize control of the "cobweb infested" facilities as I recall you writing. Those kids were desperately looking for ways to get anything resembling KLOL back on the air, and you had them convinced that KNUZ would be the answer to their prayers if they helped you get Roy's license revoked. Don't mistake the facts here. You have been trying to hijack Roy's license for your own personal agenda. You have disdain for him as not only a broadcaster, but also as a human being. While everyone here can agree that his decisions on some of his properties is questionable, it is remarkable that you find logic in attacking a single business man, who went through obtaining our precious KACO (considering it is ours, the people of Bellville, and not yours Mr. Cat Springs) in a legal manner.

Also I resent the statement that no one residing in Bellville even remembers 1090 anymore thanks to current ownership. I happen to remember KACO and the Dittert family well. Their time has past. KACO is the past. Again I pose the question to you, why not persue a license of your very own?
 
well pd,sence you want to hear from someone here in bellville ,well here you go.i am myself from bellville,and 1090 was a part a of bellville and austin county were i live.i my self missed the window to file with the fcc and so did a lot of others that also live here,we want 1090 back in local hands,this town knows that roy has not done a whole lot with 1090,we all feel very short changed,and done wrong.i was one of those that listened to 101klol when it was a great rock station,i know its gone and that 1090 will never be able to re place it, in know way shape or form.and please do not call me or any else a kid here.i happened to be 38 years old and the people that filed on roy also happened to be in there 20s,30,and 40 so were do you get kids from?to just let you know me and others will stand with mr cat spring to bring a station back on the air
here in bellville. btw i know for a fact that mr cat spring offered to buy 1090 from roy. :mad:
 
This "Roy" sure sounds like quite a character. How does he keep any of his licenses if these things are true?
 
Yes he did, and when Roy told him what he wanted for the station he turned it down. If his price was too high then your friend Tom should have moved on and looked at another station more in his price range to purchase, not turn on a legitimate broadcaster and drum up unwarranted charges of neglect against him. Since the two of you are seemingly in this together, let me pose the question to you as well, why not obtain your own license from the FCC? Stan, don't believe everything you read. While it is true that KNUZ has had several transmitter issues and has had to be off of the air several times in the last couple of years, nothing has been done underhandedly or dishonestly. Imagine that, an old 250w station that hasn't been upgraded since probably when Tom worked there in '82, with transmitter problems! These things happen. All papers were filed with the FCC each and everytime that KNUZ has had to cease broadcast. I guess what it really boils down to for the both of you is that if you truly want to make KNUZ your own, pony up the money to buy the station or leave well enough alone. Here is another idea for you gentlemen. Since KNUZ will be moving to Katy with the approval of the FCC, why don't you two file for a replacement allocation for Bellville? You could get your own frequency and format it to what ever your desire. Or would that be too easy, and you just like the fight of an uphill battle?
 
Legitimate broadcaster? HAHAHAHAHA! Unwarranted charges of neglect? Transmitter issues off several times the last couple of years??? BWWWWAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!! OMG, your killing me here! I live here [EDIT], and the station was off for just a few days short of a FULL YEAR, just enough to satisfy the STA! You cannot tell me that that tiny solid state 250 watter couldn't have been replaced with a brand new unit during that time... Truth is that bills were not getting paid like the tower rent and you people lied to the FCC with this transmitter issue BS, and that is falsification of federal documents last time I checked. When my secretary and I came into the Brenham studio and demanded the public file, you people couldn't show *any* kind of records since 2002! She and I copied every damn page, so if there is anything dated between 2002 and 2005, you have again forged federal documents. I offered a fair amount of money for our local station, but Mr Henderson wanted a totally proposterous amount of money for a class a daytimer with no upgradeability. Roy wanted to sell the call letters imo, and I for one hope they are lost for good. Your arrogance in accusing me of doing something illegal is ludicrous, but given the source, it is also laughable. The maze of the FCC process is really only known by good consultants, saavy engineers, and it seems crooked wannabe broadcasters. I posted the info to give people the instructions needed to get the job done, to have a voice with the FCC as the rules intended, and make a change in this community. You people have had your chance (repeatedly) and have failed miserably, so the commision probably will NOT be granting this move like your boasting. By the way, make sure you turn it back down to your licensed power, last time I saw it, the meter showed just a hair over 300 watts, and maybe start running the local ID's again? Since you people are lousy at broadcasting, you cannot even try to be legal when your illegal, maybe you should try politics? Some people just shouldn't have a license...

Tom Johnson

Ps: I got the guts to post my name, how about you?


[EDIT=name calling]
 
Oh, and just an FYI, there was an older tube type transmitter at KACO back in the day, not the current ss unit, so your caught in yet another lie...

Tom
 
So there is a new ss unit transmitter and the station is running at 300watts. Pretty impressive reading that you have conjurred considering the station has been "off the air except for a few days short of a year". Caught the station by chance, was it? Are you sitting there daily waiting for KNUZ to come on the air for your questionable readings? Sorry to disappoint you, Tom, but I didn't work at 1090 back in 1982 and wouldn't have any idea as to what type of transmitter was in use over 20 years ago at the station. Since you worked there at that time, you have the leg up on this argument. I couldn't tell you what type of equipment was in use at this time. You have indicated that the amount of money asked for the station by Roy was preposterously excessive. I couldn't imagine that you would be able to buy the same 250watt set up, such as KIKK from CBS,for twice the amount that the station was offered to you. I won't go into details on the price due to respect for both parties and the confidentiality of the discussion between the two of you, but it was a fair price for the amount of power the station is and the amount of people that can be, and are being served with the signal. I have no personal issue with you Mr. Johnson. I sympathize with your situation, considering the time and effort you have put into your radio station. I simply feel that your time and energy could be better utilized in going through the proper procedures in gaining your own license to broadcast, instead of dragging another man's name through the mud in order to manipulate other entities into believing that he is somehow depriving everyone in this county of their right to a format readily available to them on the FM dial. Let me ask you something, Tom. You have stated that KNUZ is basically worthless and has "no upgradablility". So why do you really want the station so badly? Do you think your rock station aimed at replacing a defunct Houston station can really serve the people of Bellville? Have you talked to the fine people of La Porte to ask them how their incarnation of this very same concept is serving them? I find it amazing that you can sit here and post such absurdities. As far as your ability to post your real name on the internet, congratulations. Anyone and everyone that wants to know your every detail can look you up and get a real feel for your motives with this issue. I invite each reader to google your name and make their own conclusions as to what your motivation is. I choose not to do the same, as many others do, and will remain anonymous, as is my right. Had the chance to check out your website, www.cat-am.com. Looks like it may have some "cobwebs" and a broken console as well. When was the last time it was actually updated? Still broadcasting on 580? Or is it 640? Or 1640? Please, clean your own closet before you pass judgement on someone else's.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom