By then we had changed the focus to "La 10-20". The Liberman Brothers (not a country group....) were so cheap that when they bought KTNQ they did not want to pay to change call letters!So, should I say 'thank you' or Ten-Q?
By then we had changed the focus to "La 10-20". The Liberman Brothers (not a country group....) were so cheap that when they bought KTNQ they did not want to pay to change call letters!So, should I say 'thank you' or Ten-Q?
Since they won't be doing local programming, what is left in talk radio but national news/talk?
Again, those who are first generation Hispanics (second and beyond just does not use much Spanish language media) don't listen to AM, and did not in their home nations.
The audience target, Valencia said, is not just the nation’s existing Spanish-speaking population but the Spanish immigrants that continue to arrive in the U.S. “The largest share of immigrants in this country are Spanish immigrants, and when they come to this country, they are searching for a piece of home, a piece of culture, a piece of tradition, and Spanish-language radio has played a part in that for a long time,” Valencia said during a panel discussion. “So long as that market and the Latino market continues to grow, there's going to be a hunger and appetite for Spanish-language media and radio content specifically.”
Perhaps I wrote it confusingly. "US Politics" as opposed to "state level politics" or "international politics. "News" as in "current happenings". Since they can't do local and state news with the expressed intent of not being local, that means "national news".You said "US politics & news." The article doesn't mention anything about US politics. So that leaves a lot of other things.
And she is ignorantly wrong, beginning with the term "... are Spanish immigrants". Few are from Spain... she obviously meant "Spanish speaking" but could not even get that right.Here's what the article says about the target audience:
I can't tell you how many people in focus groups and one-on-ones when discussing talk radio and the home nation said that they left that behind because they could not survive and they wanted nothing to do with that.
And that is an example of what I went on to say about political refugees vs. economic migrants.And yet it seems that Radio Mambi spends a lot of time talking about Cuba for some reason. Maybe I just don't understand.
From the article in the OP:What's the story with WADO 1280? Will that one be part of the sale? I know there was some kind of environmental thing going on near the transmitter site...
The deal is structured to have two closings. 1280 WADO New York will be held separately with $5 million of the purchase price held in escrow until that separate acquisition closes later due to dredging being done by the Environmental Protection Agency around the station’s tower site. If the WADO closing does not take place within 9 months of the closing of the other stations, either party has the option to pull that station from the deal.
Here's to hoping the deal goes through. WADO is ready for some new blood and ownership. Univision just wrecked it.From the article in the OP:
It’s no secret that TelevisaUnivision offloaded the poorest-performing stations in their whole group to LMN. WAQI has been hampered not only by the turmoil from the sale, but from Univision selling off the transmitter land several years earlier and undergoing a power reduction.Here's to hoping the deal goes through. WADO is ready for some new blood and ownership. Univision just wrecked it.
To be honest, Miami is an anomaly of a market. WAQI has long targeted a population diaspora that just doesn’t exist anywhere else, and it’s been (by and large) successful.And yet it seems that Radio Mambi spends a lot of time talking about Cuba for some reason. Maybe I just don't understand.
Speaking of KTNQ, the (badly) scoped airchecks of Charlie Tuna and The Real Don Steele one finds these days on line sound like absolute crap. Not only are they terrible sections of recordings, but the recording quality sounds like someone held a Lafayette cassette recorder microphone up to a handheld transistor radio speaker, and recorded it on the cheapest cassette tape one could own. I remember back in the 80's, hearing some excellent scoped airchecks of Charlie Tuna, The Real Don Steele, Gary Owens, and Wink Martindale.By then we had changed the focus to "La 10-20". The Liberman Brothers (not a country group....) were so cheap that when they bought KTNQ they did not want to pay to change call letters!
No, the available audience "wrecked" it. Hispanics are the least prone to using an AM station of any group. Nations like Mexico have tried to move all AMs to FM, leaving only a few in markets where there are no available channels or along the US border where channel separations must meat the ancient US standards. Elsewhere, such as El Salvador, all that is left on AM is Christian programming.Here's to hoping the deal goes through. WADO is ready for some new blood and ownership. Univision just wrecked it.
My bet is on this being a 2024 play, and after the elections the stations will be spun off or disposed of.After reading this thread and a couple of the articles, it looks like the LMN folks have a steep hill and will need a lot of financing for a while.
The majority of the "name brand" Hispanics on the board of this group are later generation Hispanics who generally don't use Spanish language media or even speak Spanish fluently. Your observation as to the lack of understanding of Spanish dominant Hispanics could be most valid.The odd thing is that the major US political parties, both of them, always refer to Latinos as one massive monolith, who all think alike, live alike, and hold their opinions in common, both socially and politically. Obviously, that isn't the case. And if the LMN folks are thinking like either of the political parties, it just might be their #1 problem. But I hope they can make it work, the same way I hope BIN works out in the long run.
Wow…one and done?😬 Should we start speculating on what format would follow LMN on those stations?🤔 Probably Spanish language religion for KLAT in Houston…no idea of what KFLC and KFZO in DFW would become…😣My bet is on this being a 2024 play, and after the elections the stations will be spun off or disposed of.
Should we start speculating on what format would follow LMN on those stations
There have been multple statements to staff about the purpose of the acquisition being to have a different perspective for the 2024 elections.You'd be speculating based on someone else's speculation. At some point, a double negative kicks in.
That is the stated purpose as expressed by several of the "all star" panel of Latino influencers. Several have expressed that they will need a year of "outsourced" programming in order to get ready for the 2024 election year which is "when their voice will be needed".The idea that a group overpaid for a bunch of no-audience AM stations to influence an election is very far fetched.
But none of the people who put this together have any current or recent radio experience. The two women who are the organizers have zero radio experience and are both political activists and campaign organizers.The same group could have more effect for a lot less money by using social media.
Isn't there such a thing as "Business Spanish", or an equivalent of the somewhat homogenized midwestern English used on most radio and TV (even in area with a regional accent)?Since they won't be doing local programming, what is left in talk radio but national news/talk?
Nearly every subject of interest in Spanish language talk is local... and I saw and researched that in places as diverse as Miami, New York, Chicago, Dallas-Houston-San Antonio, LA, Phoenix, San Francisco and others.
And in research for morning shows as recently as pre-pandemic years, the same conditions and interests showed up. Even light subjects, like humor, have enormous geographic limitations and restrictions due to origin, language, accent and social conditions.
That is why I said before that the focus of interest in such a talk format is in local social issues.
If you read the description of the person the want as COO (about two screens long) on their site, it is very obvious that they will be all talk, and social/sociopolitical issue based.
That has been the focus of three national Spanish language talk networks in the past. All have failed due to the lack of interest in national themes and the failure to find personalities who could do the broader social issue subjects. A very major problem is that live talk radio tends to reflect the accent and vocabulary of the national origin of each host... scripted and accent controlled TV does not have that issue anywhere near that extreme.
The word for "bug" in one country is the one for the male organ in another. The word for "bus" in one is the word for "child" in another... and so on.
Again, those who are first generation Hispanics (second and beyond just does not use much Spanish language media) don't listen to AM, and did not in their home nations.
There have been multple statements to staff about the purpose of the acquisition being to have a different perspective for the 2024 elections.
But none of the people who put this together have any current or recent radio experience.
All of them. They are not going to operate each market individually.Are you talking about only Miami or the other stations?
No, that was only the opinion of one person in regards to one station, WAQI in Miami. Radio Mambí has, for nearly 40 years, been the most important voice of the Cuban exile and reflects the position of Cuban refugee, not that of a later generation Mexican heritage American from the Southwest.From what I understand, the "different perspective" was to stop making up stuff and passing it off as news.
That's not the point. The Cuban exile community in Miami had counted on Radio Mambí since the 1980's as the most important voice for their cause. Remember, these are people who fled Cuba in rafts made of inner tubes and the like, because they had witnessed family being shot by Castro's puppets or relatives and friends put in prison and tortured for having democracy on their mind.But what's wrong with a "different perspective?" Isn't that the point of having free media? If you don't want a different perspective, go to Cuba. At least in Miami people have a choice. Nobody will be forced to listen to LMN.
Radio Mambí has consistently been in the top 10 stations in Miami. Hardly "no audience".The fact of the matter is that almost all of the stations have little or no audience.
It does not matter overall, but in Miami the feeling of censorship of a traditional anti-Castro voice is frightening. As I have mentioned, I'm an honorary (and only non-Cuban member) of the Cuban Journalists in Exile Association and have very strong feeling... mostly based on the horror stories told to me by Cuban exiles of the horrible repression of the Cuban regime.You have stated that Hispanics have no background to listen to AM radio, and you've also slammed their programming ideas. Based on all of that, why should it matter what their purpose is if it will have absolutely no effect?
She's not political... just a person brought in to try to save assets. In her case, what was needed was pure finance and debt negotiation.The same could be said of Mary Berner.
The Cuban exile community in Miami had counted on Radio Mambí since the 1980's as the most important voice for their cause.
Then it doesn't matter. Nobody will listen and the stations will all go silent.On the other hand, the group seems not to understand that in most markets Hispanics have abandoned AM entirely.
It does not matter overall, but in Miami the feeling of censorship of a traditional anti-Castro voice is frightening
She's not political... just a person brought in to try to save assets. In her case, what was needed was pure finance and debt negotiation.