• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

FCC Enforcement Actions

Isn't this whole subject moot?

>
>
> Groucho,
>
> The 100mw for AM Part 15 transmitters is Kosher... I get
> this... But what I'm saying here is quite simple... a 100mw
> (milliwatt) FM transmitter is not ever in it's life going to
> output a signal strength of 'xx millivolts' to a receiver
> 1/2 mile away... that's all I'm saying.... Yes it's a silly
> argument but not one that will be won easily here...
>
> Radiopilot
>
Hello,

I have been trying to follow this thread and gave up because the point is moot. If you are operating a 100 mW. tx at any height with almost any antenna it has been clearly shown on this board and in a recent thread about a FCC inspection that this will exceed the part15 FM limit by a vast factor. Why discuss hypothetical situations which do not exist in legal operations?

The frequent references to the Belkin units is interesting because if they are FCC certified it doesn't matter what output power they produce. They had to be certified as a unit including the antenna and obviously if the certification is correct for the Belkin units, they met the field strength requirements. The rules apply only to the field strength and not the tx power or the antenna. The radiated field depends on the power and the antenna and the Belkin specs. cannot be extrapolated to a 100 mW tx feeding a whip or dipole.

Neil
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom