AugC said:MOst of all LPFM's that I've heard...splatter on 2nd adjacents and play no "local" content. So, really, they really serve a handful of folks....that might be listening. The only good LPFM is WRPO-LP. All the ones that I have listened to are sat. fed. Very sad. There's more local content with the big wigs than that!!! C'mon folks....!!!! Didn't you hear....Clear Channel is selling off 400 plus stations!!! More mom and pops are buying them! Hopefully more "local" content. Really the spectrum is way too full. LPFM is not that bad if used properly...translators on the other hand are just plain rediculous. They really are the offenders.
EVERY radio transmitter causes some interference. The question is it within the FCC regulations? I don't know whose LPFM you are listening to, or on what kind of radio you are having such problems. The problem could be your radio, not the LPFM station. There are a lot of variables, and I don’t know anything about your particular situation. All the LPFM's I've ever heard are not causing any illegal interference.
I agree that satellite feeds are an inappropriate use of either LPFM or Translators. I'm the GM of a successful local LPFM. We try very hard to "go by the book." In a market with 35 or so stations, we do quite well. LPFM does not have to mean "bad programming." You shouldn't make blanket statements. Neither LPFM stations nor translators are either good or bad. Properly engineered, they are more or less “value neutral. It’s what you choose to do with them that counts.