• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

FCC MEETING TODAY

To make a long story short, we have a need for what I want to bring.

Everything else that works best in a small town, is already being covered.

Besides my hometown has less than 30,000 people living it.

My musical tastes lie within the sphere of hardcore sounding Christian music. (Rock, Hip-Hop and Pop sounding tunes)

Want to do something that no one else is already doing.

Hence my reason for wanting to do a 24/7 presentation of CCM without the talk or any live announcers.

And yes I plan on playing the local musicians too.

We have a few of them, that I love to check out.

Have some of their fine music in my library already.

R.D.P. <><

P.S. For those wondering, People for Jesus is just a writing Ministry right now.  I'm a one man show creating Books and Tracts, which I pass out all over Selma and the surrounding area.
 
One other thought.

Since the Liberals already have two voices, why bring another one?

Their first voice is 50,000 watt strong WBFZ Z 105.3 FM.

And it's owned by a local civil rights law firm.

Need I say more?

Their second voice is WAPR 88.3 FM.

That voice is all things NPR.

And yes it's a major voice for all things liberal.

So with those two voices doing the liberal thing, why set up a third one.

I just don't see a need for it personally.

R.D.P. <><
 
bturner said:
The way I read this is your non-profit could have been created a week before the filing window. The 2 year minimum is for claiming a point just in case you have others apply on top of you.

I'm waiting for the dust to settle, and for cooler heads to digest and analyze what really was said in the FCC meeting. Some sources are reporting that it was made clear during the meeting that rules will be rewritten. Some have indicated that if not a N-F-P for at least two years, app will be returned. Others have indicated that less than two years sends you to the back of the line... which is a bit more severe that losing one point.

Time will tell what the real policy will be.
 
A couple of words of caution for aspiring LPFMers.

We all live in insulated worlds whether in the big city or small town. We have a natural tendency to rationalize success based on our friends liking what we propose to do. I'm not try to discourage but I am saying I've seen some learn that the format they wanted to do only had listeners included in that small inner circle and they were not very good at supporting what you do. Stepping outside your circle of influence is a wise thing because you discover your dream format might be tweaked a bit to become the dream station to quite a few. Just remember your station is not about you but the community you will serve. I worked for one guy that dreamed of owning a classical music station. He bought his first station and did country music because that's what most folks in his service area wanted. He was not a fan of country music.

Think money. The biggest mistake made by LPFMers is finding more funding than they need. Funding is fickle and so are expenses. If you need X amount, strive for more funding. What if you're on the air for 3 months and suffer a lightning strike and need a new transmitter? Don't stop generating funding when you just have the bills covered. Some savings for emergencies is always needed. If you hate sales, learn to like it. It's not really sales but going out to make friends and working for their success. It's not those that don't want another friend that count but those who extend the friendship. Remember, they need to be visited quite a bit to get to know you and trust you, so don't give up.

You will be a prisoner to your station. It works 24/7/365 and so will you. You need to ask yourself how deep is your a love of radio?

Do less than you can financially do. In other words, don't spend everything in your account. People that tune in will see every advancement you make as success and every cutback as failure. People want to ride the coat tails of winers. Budget yourself so you never have to take a step back.

Remember, LPFM reaches a micro-market. You need as many listeners in this tiny market as possible to succeed. 1% of 10,000 or 30,000 is not many people. Think long and hard about doing a niche format. If you have 100 listeners is that enough to fund your station or will you be funding it from your own pocket? Can you afford that? Also, it might take a couple of years to build to the point of having enough in donations/underwriting to pay for the operation.

I'm not trying to act like I know it all, I sure don't. I do know a bunch of LPFM operators and I've been a GM of a couple of stations. I've fallen into about any trap you can think of and some I haven't thought of yet, so you might say I learned the hard way. And I am passionate about radio too, so I have a pretty good idea of your thinking process since it's the same I've had.

One wise radio station owner told me once: You are your biggest fan of your format and always will be because you are driven to put your best out there. Just don't expect other fans no matter what they tell you. Nothing beats building a station from the ground up with a clean slate.
 
Based on the FCC's definition of "established community presence" in the revised rules, it appears the two year requirement will stand firm, no exceptions.

While I know it's too late to change it, I still contend this requirement is unfair and shuts out many organizations who could still potentially operate viable community radio stations. Some groups, such as ours, were not able to find enough committed board members as far back as October 15th, 2011 (I'm assuming one's organization must have been registered by this time in order to even be considered). Even so, we are dedicated to providing a much needed community radio service to our area.

Obviously, we will now focus our efforts on finding an established group with whom to partner. So far, our efforts to do so have been futile. There are still a few doors left to knock on, but, as I will be telling the other board members later today, we may now have to face the unpleasant fact that we may have missed the boat. I'm sure other LPFM hopefuls will also be facing that fact, too, given the new rules.
 
I have read the full report a couple of times. I see nothing that says an applicant must have an established presence for at least two years prior to filing the application. Please point this out.

I did see that as a criteria for determining the best candidate when more than one apply for the same frequency, this is one of the points one can take. In this instance applicants are awarded points for various promises made. One of the points you can earn is being a non-profit that has been recognized at least two years prior to the filing of an application for a LPFM.
 
There is no requirement that an applicant be established for two years. There is a single preference point that will be awarded if this hurdle is cleared. The points only come into play if there are multiple applicants that are mutually exclusive.

Mutually exclusive means:
More than one applicant for the same channel that are too close geographically.
Applicants for different channels that are one the next frequency up or down the band. Or the second channel up or down the band if they're right on top of each other.

However, if the belief that there is a two year cut-off keeps anybody from applying for an LPFM license, this is a good thing. LPFM is very difficult to make into a going concern. Quitters need not apply.

I have started a few LPFM stations for various people, as well as a few small full powered noncommercial stations. I know how this stuff works.

Read and understand the rules, THEN start stating 'truths' about them. Being adamant in ignorance is not the hallmark of a winner.

The FCC has intentionally cleared wide swaths of 'LPFM only' channels in all major markets in this week's ruling. There will be an availble LPFM channel or two or even a half dozen in most places. And there will probably be an avalanche of mutually exclusive (MX) applications in most, if not all big markets.

The people who promise to man a local studio at least 20 hours a week and provide programs from it will get an extra 3 points for their comparative points tally. I believe this is going to be the big decider in a lot of MX situations in the biggest markets.

So by all means, set things up so you can maximize your points tally. But be ready to prove it, because in a competitive hearing, your statements will most likely be challenged by your competitors. Several full power noncom licenses went to the second place finisher in FCC hearings over bogus statements made by applicants with winning points tallies in the 2007 NCE FM window.

In a comparative hearing, if you don't have that extra point for being locally established for 2 or more years, it could cost you the permit if your competitor has a full house of points. But a lot of the competition also won't qualify for all possible points either, so not being a 2-year old often won't blow you out of the water. Especially if you're outside the center of the biggest markets, where there will be bloodbath of competitive filings.

One tip I can offer as an engineer who has done these filings:
If you locate several available channels that are more or less equal, lucky you. I suggest chosing neither the lowest frequency, which more people seem to choose, nor the highest, because contrary people like me will go there. Grab one from the middle. You might find fewer competitors applying for your desired channel. Unless your competitors are all reading this message.

One other thing. If you find out that others in your community are also planning to apply for LPFM, try to work with them so you don't all apply for the same channel. There's nothing in the FCC rules that prohibits this kind of cooperation until AFTER the filing window has closed. In fact, they seem to prefer that you work things out in advance to relieve stress on their competitive hearing process.

Another strategic point. Once the filing window has closed, there will be a settlement period. This allows applicants who are MX with each other to come to agreements.

You can agree to drop out in exchange for the other guy paying back all your engineering and legal expenses (no profit allowed).

You can try to find an alternate channel that nobody else applied for in the window. Apparently the FCC is going to allow jumping to any available alternate channel, rather than just the first, second or third adjacent channels this time around. This is assuming that all available channels haven't already been applied for, of course.

You can come to your own time sharing agreement. If you wait for the FCC to impose time sharing, they will split the day in half or thirds. You might want your own schedule instead, so it would make sense to settle before the FCC decides for you.

The FCC will allow MX applicants to move their transmitter site to a common site if it would facilitate time sharing. Your site, their site or some place in between.

If you keep these things in mind as you look for potential partners in an LPFM station, you may be able to give yourself more options after the filing window closes and the FCC concrete starts to set.
 
Superb post Shiny Knob.

I really like the part about knowing the rules. So many in radio fail to realize the FCC and the other broadcasters in your area are serious about the rules. It's not like driving a car where you get a pass for anything less than 10 mph over or forgetting to turn on your turn signal. The FCC expects you to know, understand and implement the rules flawlessly. If you slip on the little stuff, that's a red flag because it typically says you aren't keeping up with the most important stuff. And doing more than the minimum might just help if you do slip up and get caught. And, if you aren't sure about a rule, by all means ask the source. Demonstrate you want to do the right thing.

Yes, be serious with the LPFM. It is a big deal.

I might add that other radio station owners and managers are not usually against LPFM and forging an atmosphere of cooperation and friendship is always a good thing. Chances are you might need one another down the road.
 
bturner said:
A couple of words of caution for aspiring LPFMers.

We all live in insulated worlds whether in the big city or small town. We have a natural tendency to rationalize success based on our friends liking what we propose to do. I'm not try to discourage but I am saying I've seen some learn that the format they wanted to do only had listeners included in that small inner circle and they were not very good at supporting what you do. Stepping outside your circle of influence is a wise thing because you discover your dream format might be tweaked a bit to become the dream station to quite a few. Just remember your station is not about you but the community you will serve. I worked for one guy that dreamed of owning a classical music station. He bought his first station and did country music because that's what most folks in his service area wanted. He was not a fan of country music.

Think money. The biggest mistake made by LPFMers is finding more funding than they need. Funding is fickle and so are expenses. If you need X amount, strive for more funding. What if you're on the air for 3 months and suffer a lightning strike and need a new transmitter? Don't stop generating funding when you just have the bills covered. Some savings for emergencies is always needed. If you hate sales, learn to like it. It's not really sales but going out to make friends and working for their success. It's not those that don't want another friend that count but those who extend the friendship. Remember, they need to be visited quite a bit to get to know you and trust you, so don't give up.

You will be a prisoner to your station. It works 24/7/365 and so will you. You need to ask yourself how deep is your a love of radio?

Do less than you can financially do. In other words, don't spend everything in your account. People that tune in will see every advancement you make as success and every cutback as failure. People want to ride the coat tails of winers. Budget yourself so you never have to take a step back.

Remember, LPFM reaches a micro-market. You need as many listeners in this tiny market as possible to succeed. 1% of 10,000 or 30,000 is not many people. Think long and hard about doing a niche format. If you have 100 listeners is that enough to fund your station or will you be funding it from your own pocket? Can you afford that? Also, it might take a couple of years to build to the point of having enough in donations/underwriting to pay for the operation.

I'm not trying to act like I know it all, I sure don't. I do know a bunch of LPFM operators and I've been a GM of a couple of stations. I've fallen into about any trap you can think of and some I haven't thought of yet, so you might say I learned the hard way. And I am passionate about radio too, so I have a pretty good idea of your thinking process since it's the same I've had.

One wise radio station owner told me once: You are your biggest fan of your format and always will be because you are driven to put your best out there. Just don't expect other fans no matter what they tell you. Nothing beats building a station from the ground up with a clean slate.

As the guy who programs a fairly successful LP-FM, I couldn't agree more with the points in your post.

It's OK, I suppose, to want to program "something different". BUT, before you do it try and find out if the type of programming you want to offer is something your community will actually listen to.

I tell people on these boards over and over and over again that in radio, "if you build it, they will come", is not necessarily true. Many stations fail because there's no audience for what they're programming, or else, their programming is too scattershot, or to use an old radio term...AOR (for "all over the road"!)

The station I work with got a local church to help them with a simple study...phone calls in the evening to 100 households in the villages the station's signal covers. You might be interested to know that the most often mentioned desired format (by almost 6 out of 10 respondents) was "oldies".

Once you know if there's a defined format you can occupy, don't try to reinvent radio. Now, I know this grates against a few people on these boards, but what do the successful companies know that you don't know? OK, I know there's some pretty lousy companies in radio today, but not all of them are. Look at the ones that are successful in the format you want for your local community. You don't have to copy word for word what they do, but listen for the common threads you see making them successful and apply them to your station in your own way.

Make your station sound professional. Sure, you may be working with volunteers who will sound like (and maybe are) newbies. But put a professional sound around them. Then work with your volunteers to help them improve their performance. (If they won't take the advice, kick 'em out the door...there's no room for egos at this level of broadcasting.)

Make sure you have decent processing on your station. $199 bucks and an old, but serviceable desktop computer will buy you Breakaway Broadcast. I'm using it. It works great and is a reasonable digital processor. Get microphone processors, too...at least on your main studio microphones.

Establish a standard bit rate for your music. At my station, every song is ripped in at 320K mp-3. Wav files are better, of course, but if you need to conserve hard drive space a bit, 320 is acceptable. Don't let your volunteer DJ's play from their i-Pods. So many people are listening to crappy 128K and 192K mp-3's on those...and it is noticeable on the air when you play a crappy mp-3 next to a good one.

Need to get some music? Long as you're paying your music licensing fees, go to a business like uncompressedmusic.com. $1.25 a cut is about the cheapest deal around for .wav file downloads. And yes, they work with LP-FM's.

Then, enlist the co-operation of the mayor and/or council in your town, have a local news presence (even if it's a weekly summary of news airing twice a day). Do local weather and school delays and closings for your area. This can be done even if you don't have a live staffer. Establish a relationship with the local newspaper and/or a paper that your audience routinely reads. Have a cable company in town? See if they'll run your audio on a local events channel.

In 3 years, our station has gone from 12 to almost 100 underwriters. Our station succeeds because we sound pro...comparable to the sound of stations in two much bigger markets over an hour away. Still, we have local shows, local voices (both trained and untrained)...and it all runs out of a desktop PC in a studio inside our local municipal offices. (We are owned by the village the station calls home.) We're not overly profitable, but we have been able to put a little back into the business this year and that's a good thing.

And yes, know the rules. You're not a commercial station and you can't be using "calls to action" and other "selling" language...neither in your spots or announcer comments. Have a public file and keep it up to date. Good luck.

If you want some advice or have a question, you can send me a message thru these boards.
 
Jason,

That's some really good information. Thank you for sharing that.

I'm an aspiring LPFM operator looking at providing a "full service" type format. (I spent 24 years in AM radio in this same market.)
 
Alan McCall said:
Jason,

That's some really good information. Thank you for sharing that.

I'm an aspiring LPFM operator looking at providing a "full service" type format. (I spent 24 years in AM radio in this same market.)

Just one correction on my post: LP-FM's do not, as I understand it, have to keep a public file. But, you have to keep track of EAS stuff and keep a station log. (Though I personally would keep a file of communications with the public...it couldn't hurt.)
 
Jason Roberts said:
Alan McCall said:
That's some really good information. Thank you for sharing that.

I'm an aspiring LPFM operator looking at providing a "full service" type format. (I spent 24 years in AM radio in this same market.)

Just one correction on my post: LP-FM's do not, as I understand it, have to keep a public file. But, you have to keep track of EAS stuff and keep a station log. (Though I personally would keep a file of communications with the public...it couldn't hurt.)

One bit of philosophy I have picked up from these forums is: Your LPFM effort may have a very limited reach and purpose if all you do is put audio on a transmitter. One of my favorite "curmudgeons" has suggested that some highly specialized community groups should consider opening a coffee shop instead. Practice book club mentality. Podcast what little audio content you are able to generate. Do On-line streaming without the FCC hassle.

My adaptation of that is to consider acquiring the LPFM to help your coffee shop/book club/community streaming get local publicity and acquire local "clout" through the FCC license. "What do you mean we can't record the city council meeting? We are a licensed FCC media!" I have a feeling that some LPFM licensees will in future years abandon their license and transmitter and focus on other distribution methods. (That may be true of some commercial broadcasters in rural communities.)

In the meantime, if you are establishing a community presence and legitimacy, keeping a Public File (even though not required) and other trappings of a traditional broadcast station will enhance your image in the community. In planning where you will locate your "broadcasting apparatus" keep image in mind.

Yes, you can run your station out of a closet in the Board Chairman's house or a back room at your church. But if you buy into the concept that within a decade you may cross the bridge and burn your FCC license and sell the transmitter in a yard sale, will your new-direction audio-transmission scheme only be possible if you have built some kind of image and presence in your community?

As I understand it, Jason is telling us about a station that has a presence in a city owned building.
 
Jason Roberts said:
Alan McCall said:
Jason,

That's some really good information. Thank you for sharing that.

I'm an aspiring LPFM operator looking at providing a "full service" type format. (I spent 24 years in AM radio in this same market.)

Just one correction on my post: LP-FM's do not, as I understand it, have to keep a public file. But, you have to keep track of EAS stuff and keep a station log. (Though I personally would keep a file of communications with the public...it couldn't hurt.)

Yes, there is no public file requirement for LPFM. All that is required is to keep a station log, EAS log, and a political file. The retention period on the EAS records is two years, I'm not sure on the others.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom