• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

FCC TEST QUESTION

I have a question regarding the FCC Test WABC and other radio stations use from time to time. I have noticed back in the 1970s these tests seem to be more frequent then today.
I was wondering why have these tests in the first place ? Are there any actual results being taken from these tests ? If so are these government secrets ? If not, why the need to spread the work about an emerency ahead of time ?
 
MusicRadioUSA said:
I have a question regarding the FCC Test WABC and other radio stations use from time to time. I have noticed back in the 1970s these tests seem to be more frequent then today.
I was wondering why have these tests in the first place ? Are there any actual results being taken from these tests ? If so are these government secrets ? If not, why the need to spread the work about an emerency ahead of time ?
The FCC Regs state that WEEKLY TESTS be conducted ONCE each week at different times and days.

MONTHLY TESTS be conducted between the hours of 8:30AM & LOCAL SUNSET (ODD MONTHS)

MONTHLY TESTS be conducted between the hours of LOCAL SUNSET & 8:30 AM.

Exclusions are for any week or month where you have an actual EAS Activation & Message(such as a Tornado Watch,Thunderstorm Warning etc).

Thank God they don't still do the OLD 60 SECOND TONE!!!

John Barrett
 
The EAS tests exist for stations to make sure their emergency alert receivers are operating properly, and that the local area EAS network is also working properly.

There's no "government secrets" involved. At least not since the days of EBS (the old "Emergency Broadcast System"), when activation depended upon use of a "code word" that was scheduled and changed on a daily basis by the FCC. Those "code words" were kept in a sealed envelope in the EBS packets of every station (a pink envelope, in fact) and were not to be opened unless you had an activation.

There was one "accidental" (and, as it later turned out, incorrect) activation when I worked in a station a long time ago, so I opened the envelope. I can assure you there was nothing spectacular in it. Unless you really get excited by listings such as:

Aug. 29: Zulu Alpha.
Aug. 30: Bravo Tango. Etc....

That's what you would have found inside such envelopes.

Of course, the other thing no one mentions even about EAS today. Most of the "local primaries" (read that as: the stations that are supposed to dissemenate the information to the public in the event of the unthinkable), most very likely have towers that are within mere miles of first strike targets and will, certainly, go up with the first big mushroom cloud. (Even though some radio stations actually have government paid "bomb shelters" at their transmitter sites and, might actually have people inside who may survive, only to have nothing on which to transmit.) Tell me that idea wasn't a government operation!

However, for more typical civic emergencies, the system should work fine. IF...(and I needed to put that in caps, 'cause it's a big "if") the people inside the radio stations know how to use it. Which, in a lot of cases, they don't. Which is one of the reasons I'm all for going back to operator license tests, and making sure you can pass one before you can operate a radio station.
 
Bring back the old days and the Ball Brothers' receivers!

Most stations seem to have gotten a handle on this new system but that certainly wasn't the situation back when they started using it! There were some great tests run back in the beginning days that sometimes included a myriad of call letters as operator after operator forgot to wait for the end tones!
 
Unless someone had re-tuned the receiver to listen to their friend do the overnight shift at another radio station.
 
Froggy said:
Thank God they don't still do the OLD 60 SECOND TONE!!!

There was never a 60-second tone.

The old ConelraD test was:
--Carrier off for 5 seconds.
--Carrer on and unmodulated for 5 seconds.
--Carrier off for 5 seconds.
--Carrier on with 1 kHz tone for 15 seconds.

The original EBS test was 20-25 seconds of 853 Hz + 960 Hz.

The EAS system uses repetitive bursts of 300-baud data (known affectionately in the radio business, particularly to engineers, as "duck farts").
 
dumber than a box of hair said:
The EAS system uses repetitive bursts of 300-baud data (known affectionately in the radio business, particularly to engineers, as "duck farts").

Do the characteristics of the duck farts bear any resemblance to the data that dial-up modems use? That is, could you feed the radio data into a modem and have it decode the text?

(Ducks? Bears? Oh my....)
 
cawasinnj said:
Do the characteristics of the duck farts bear any resemblance to the data that dial-up modems use? That is, could you feed the radio data into a modem and have it decode the text?

The data appears to be in standard ASCII format, meaning that any terminal program (Windows HyperTerminal or something similar) should be able to decode it.

FCC Rules, Section 11.31(a)(1):

"The Preamble and EAS Codes must use Audio Frequency Shift Keying at a rate of 520.83 bits per second to transmit the codes. Mark frequency is 2083.3 Hz and space frequency is 1562.5 Hz. Mark and space time must be 1.92 milliseconds. Characters are ASCII seven bit characters as defined in ANSI X3.4-1977 ending with an eighth null bit (either 0 or 1) to constitute a full eight-bit byte."
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom