What do you mean they own both. They own KBLX, KGMZ, KOIT, KMVQ and KUFX.KYLD 1.7 - still above KRBQ, but not a good look. I don’t think it’s a cause for alarm though solely because it’s iHeart. We will see if it doesn’t get better in a year or two.
KBLX is also losing steam. With 4 stations in the bay with Bonneville may be more cause for a change.
is Bonneville more likely to tweak or flip? I personally think that one of them has to change since they compete against each other and both share bottom share ratings.
What do you mean they own both. They own KBLX, KGMZ, KOIT, KMVQ and KUFX.
Also, you are assuming KBLX is losing steam based on useless 6+ numbers.
I was clearly wrong in that.What are you talking about? I didn’t say “they own both in any part. KGMZ is Audacy.
Remember, nearly all (nationally) HD2 channel ratings come from the translator that many HD2 channels have "tied" to them. Nielsen does not rate commercial translators separately as they depend on either an AM station, a related "full FM" or an HD channel to be allowed to operate.It's nice to consistently see some HD2 channels show up in the book.
There's only one translator in the Bay Area repeating an HD-2 channel and that's for Air1 (via KLVS Livermore). As it is, there are relatively few translators in the Bay Area due to crowding and historic short-spacing. All are either repeating EMF stations (usually KLVS), or noncomms, or AM stations.Remember, nearly all (nationally) HD2 channel ratings come from the translator that many HD2 channels have "tied" to them. Nielsen does not rate commercial translators separately as they depend on either an AM station, a related "full FM" or an HD channel to be allowed to operate.
Even more surprising to me when you consider that there are broad areas of the East Bay where none of the three signals can be received well, if at all.I find it fascinating that KDFC-FM does so well. I guess they know their target demo.
Add to that KDFC might have the best audio fidelity of any Bay Area station. (At least their 104.9 signal, which is the one that comes in best on the lower peninsula.) The classical music sparkles, unlike so many other stations who screw their sound up with overprocessing or Voltair. (#2 for audio quality might be KOIT.)Even more surprising to me when you consider that there are broad areas of the East Bay where none of the three signals can be received well, if at all.
Yes, KCSM just became NPR affiliated.Did KCSM just recently start subscribing to Nielsen? I don't remember seeing them listed before.
So, NPR pays for the subscription? The station has run various NPR shows (Jazz Night in America, etc) for many years. I assume the new Station Manager cemented the affiliation. They also re-did their website using the NPR template.Yes, KCSM just became NPR affiliated.
So, NPR pays for the subscription?
That is true. Although if KCSM receives enough donations from the public to be CPB-qualified (which I'm sure they do) they are eligible for programming grants from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. It's not a lot of $$, but it helps to defray the cost of programming.My understanding (from four years working at an NPR station, until my retirement two months ago) is that NPR requires member stations to subscribe as part of the terms and conditions of affiliation. So KCSM is paying for it.
Agreed, but KCSM isn't a primary affiliate (like KQED or your alma mater are). They might carry a jazz program or two (e.g., Piano Jazz before Marion McPartland died), and maybe an hourly newscast or two during AM drive, but the dues probably reflect that secondary status.My understanding (from four years working at an NPR station, until my retirement two months ago) is that NPR requires member stations to subscribe as part of the terms and conditions of affiliation. So KCSM is paying for it.