Dancerev889 said:
But what purpose does it serve? Radio executives are not looking at message boards to find the next format to bring to a market. They are looking at research. Besides a few people on here, no one has come up with a business plan to take to any of these radio companies. Look at the knucklehead that said Bob Saget is going to bring a dance station to a market. Do you think that makes the "cause" look good? As a format and a genre we do some of the most stupid things I have ever seen. Labels ripping other labels, artists taking cheap shots at other artists, and the list goes on.
2008 has been a very successful year. Rome wasnt built in a day. NYC got a dance station back and there are more dance records breaking at Top 40. To me that is progress. So what do we need to do? Continue to make great records not good ones and support the stations that are out there. Make them the story because if they are successful, then you may see more dance stations very soon.
For the purpose of the coalition, I want dance music fans to see the "hate". But I do not want anyone to take that hate and go on the "negative" either. If that could build blocks amongst dance fans in any given market to make some noise and start supporting the venues (clubs, LEGAL purchasing of music, blasting dance music out of cars, etc.) in a positive, proactive manner, then that is the steps WE have to take to bring about our argument to the "powers that be".
Regarding that post about "Bob Saget" I knocked that down immediately because yeah, it was stupid. And yes, we're not going to get anywhere with stupidity nor ripping each other (to which I've heard some of that and I'm NOT going to "go there".) That definitely serves no purpose, especially for what we are trying to do. But at the same time I
HAD to see that in order to get an idea of where things had broken down and what needs to be done to rise it up. Heck, people probably ripped me...I don't care. Whatever is happening is not about me...it's about the music.
The physical statistics I do have go back to when I first ran the coalition in 1993. Of course a lot has happened in 15 years. One of which is....terrestrial radio is
SUFFERING. With the iPods, Internet streams and smartphones out there, terrestrial radio has lost its edge by being too conventional and making every format "cookie cutter". We don't need a "Jack", "Pete", "Frank" or "Gwendolyn" format. Radio has to do something that may be "risky" and non-conventional but can also garner an audience that WANTS something different and that's where ad billings come in. I'm not just saying dance music...that could be anything. New York City doesn't have an SD country station yet the fanbase and potential money is there. Perhaps they would have to do something different than what was presented in the past.
YES...definitely support what is there now. I always have!

Maybe the "10 for '09" that I'm doing on the coalition is asking a LOT. But we'll take what we can get. Heck, I'll even take CHR stations that are dance friendly if it means more dance music airplay (such as WFHN - Fun 107 in Fairhaven (outside of New Bedford), Massachusetts). Bring on more acts that can make good music to "break the barriers" of conventional Top 40....absolutely! And the most important thing.....
STOP BEING FACELESS!

Don't get me wrong, I don't mind a hottie eye-candy in a bikini once in a while. But how about pictures of artists! They're the ones making the music, not the hottie.
Rome wasn't built in a day....heck, I've been at this for 15 years. But things are building. And if taking what is negative, and turning it positive is something that can advance us....then so be it!
Brett....if you have my number, call me.