DavidEduardo said:Carmine5 said:The purpose, as accomplished through the marvel of radio technology, is to disseminate information, opinion, entertainment etc., to the local population. As such, most people of any country (yourself obviously excluded) would find the idea of such local airwaves owned and operated by a foreign entity repugnant--myself included. The government certainly does.
No, the government allows 25% foreign ownership. Some countries allow total foreign ownership, others allow none. Others allow domestic corporations owned by foreigners to own stations; I owned a dozen or so stations in South America some years ago in such an arrangement.
To be sure, Emmis will undoubtedly find some shell game strategy to make this deal tidy and legal. That doesn't make it or them any less repugnant.
An LMA, in lay terms, is a lease. Emmis still owns the station.
In any case, GRC could finance the purchase, later, by its President's son, who is a US citizen, and continue to lease it from him. Perfectly legal. No different than Rupert Murdoch becoming a US Citizen to buy media properties... just a lot less money involved.
I know exactly what an LMA is having considered a similar arrangement for a station in Northern CA. That is not what was referring to but rather these plans of Emmis: "...if GRC can't make the deal due to international restrictions, a third party assigned by GRC can buy KMVN."
If you can bother to get off your condescending high horse for but a moment you might be capable of a civil conversation on this subject.
C5