And your point?
> How many companies don't say they want new properties?
> Sounds pretty generic to me.
I don't know, how many companies? And so what?
They have a long way to
> go, 91X has lost 40 percent of their revenue in the
> past 2 years. In San Diego Alternative Rock is a zero
> sum game, 2 stations can't exist in the format &
> make money. As for XPRS, The Viejas Band of Kumeyaay
> Indians, which owns and operates Viejas Casino,
> owns 50% of BCA. Sports has the highest power
> ratio of any format XPRS is doing fine.
I apologize in advance if I am off base on this, but it sounds to me like you are changing the subject. Except for who owns BCA, the success of 91X (or lack of) has NOTHING to do with what we were talking about.
And, as a matter of fact, I'm not even sure wha the relevence of Vieja's stake in BCA has to do with anything?
Can we please stay on topic?
> > >
> > >
> > > > Doc, I certainly hope that was a typo in the subject
> > line
> > > > and not some thinly veiled accusation about the
> company
> > or
> > >
> > > > its owners and employees.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > Uh, did you read the link posted earlier? They said they
> > wanted more stations in the San Diego market. So why else
> > would we be talking about it?
> > And by the way, if you wish to speculate about what they
> > will do with their current properties, there's plenty of
> > stuff here on the board already, including a thread just
> > below, about what they are going to do now that Chio has
> > backed out of the Z90 morning slot.
> >
>