Smokin'!
I have no idea. Not my domain. I am sure they will have to service or replace the damaged antenna, at least that lower element, but I am sure the phasing harness and related hardware got toasty, as well as the feedline. I am sure Cumulus engineering are working that out. I am also sure I'll have to be there or someone from my shop to make sure nothing happens to our 800 antennas, they are lowest on the mast on two side arms and that RF subsite is a CRITICAL one for our public safety trunking system which serves more than 8,000 subscribers and provides vital downtown (and even further out) users including FCSO, FCMD, cities of College Park and Hapeville also are on our system and this site does wonders for getting good inbound signal into places there. We have 14 other sites and are simulcast, but the Westin is the big mouth for downtown.How long do they expect the repairs will take?
While I see your point, I wouldn't get too bent out of shape in this case. The Radio Discussions threads are akin to a bunch of radio people (including a few old curmudgeons), sitting around and chatting about radio topics and whatever else comes up and wherever those conversations lead. In the case of one or two of the posts above, it appears they were commenting, based upon what was known at the time. The fact that it was a lightning strike changes things up a bit.It’s very frustrating when people hide behind screen names and criticize people, when they have zero factual information. Atlanta is a major market and with the possible exception of me, there is exceptional engineering talent in the market. The current Cumulus engineering team is no exception. They were on top of the problem, and when they needed parts to get back on the air quickly, they knew who to call. I’m not sure that issue could have been handled any quicker, or any better.
CK
The fact of the matter is, they called out good, qualified individuals with no factual information whatsoever. They do it without being brave enough to say who they are, much like yourself. If you want to go toe to toe with professional engineers and second guess them, man up and say who you are.While I see your point, I wouldn't get too bent out of shape in this case. The Radio Discussions threads are akin to a bunch of radio people (including a few old curmudgeons), sitting around and chatting about radio topics and whatever else comes up and wherever those conversations lead. In the case of one or two of the posts above, it appears they were commenting, based upon what was known at the time. The fact that it was a lightning strike changes things up a bit.
Slightly to the NE, to protect WSSL. https://fccdata.org/?facid=&call=wn...=&lmspl=&party_type=LICEN&latd=&lond=&lang=enIs WNNX on a DA pattern? I wonder if that could prolong full restoration time?
Not that I know of. I doubt BofA would allow an antenna on the tip of the building. Maybe under it in the lit-up open space, but I wonder how much signal blockage would result from an antenna being stuck in there.Somewhat related question: Are there any broadcast antennas on top of the Bank of America building? Would broadcasting from that building be more advantageous than the Westin?
Years ago, there was a low-power signal for something called Atlanta Channel, which conveyed to visitors what was going on in Atlanta, on the B of A building. But there was never a "real" broadcast signal on that building.Somewhat related question: Are there any broadcast antennas on top of the Bank of America building? Would broadcasting from that building be more advantageous than the Westin?
Coincidentally, it now broadcasts from the Westin.Years ago, there was a low-power signal for something called Atlanta Channel, which conveyed to visitors what was going on in Atlanta, on the B of A building. But there was never a "real" broadcast signal on that building.