S
sclohonet
Guest
Guess no one here cares since we've had the info for about a week and no one has said anything. ??? ??? :-\
-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
Try this: I think nobody is surprised.
Except that I'm a "little" surprised that the Bear is 6th overall. (I think...I didn't look again before posting...shoot me if I'm wrong.)
This town is TOO DAMN PREDICTABLE.
Except that I'm a "little" surprised that the Bear is 6th overall. (I think...I didn't look again before posting...shoot me if I'm wrong.)
This town is TOO DAMN PREDICTABLE.
Scott: No one here cares to haul out their microscope to find the Summit City Radio Group numbers.
Oh yeah, we know, every station has some audience and with enough frequency can bring advertisers results.
Enough of this. I have to get back to networking.
Oh yeah, we know, every station has some audience and with enough frequency can bring advertisers results.
Enough of this. I have to get back to networking.
S
sclohonet
Guest
Just what I thought. Never mind then, back to work.
B
badhabit
Guest
Some of us have been "strongly advised" to not discuss ratings on message boards. :-X
But why? Where's the fun in that!?badhabit said:
radio-info.com has a license to print the numbers, so it is fine to use them in a post here.
- Status