• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

flushing at metro

Good Post/Reply

Morning TFX Dude
Well i guess you had enough time to answer, good answers & points of view well taken
All im saying is US as O.A.T.(DJ'S) we need to get together involved in the decision making
Politically Involved im not talking at the radio station level, im referring to the big Radio (washington)
Maybe im dreaming but i love my CAREER after 12 years i still look forward to going on the air

Hey man it was just a suggestion but if people are going to think negative WE CANT DO THIS OR ANYTHING ABOUT IT THEN JUST B.O.H.I.C.A.

It is pretty sad that we (well i guess most of you guys/ladies) do have the talent & brain to challenge, organize, stand up & make a difference AND we do nothing NADA

no mas....
it was great chatting with you M TFX D
 
SEMPERFIRADIO said:
Good Post/Reply

Morning TFX Dude
Well i guess you had enough time to answer, good answers & points of view well taken
All im saying is US as O.A.T.(DJ'S) we need to get together involved in the decision making
Politically Involved im not talking at the radio station level, im referring to the big Radio (washington)
Maybe im dreaming but i love my CAREER after 12 years i still look forward to going on the air

Hey man it was just a suggestion but if people are going to think negative WE CANT DO THIS OR ANYTHING ABOUT IT THEN JUST B.O.H.I.C.A.

It is pretty sad that we (well i guess most of you guys/ladies) do have the talent & brain to challenge, organize, stand up & make a difference AND we do nothing NADA

no mas....
it was great chatting with you M TFX D

Dang, with all this lack of traffic reporting work, I tell ya, I'm on message boards too much. :D

On a light note, I prefer On-Air Personality because a DJ, to me, is the term of a club DJ - blaring "Come On Ride The Train" by the Quad City DJ's to the clubbing trendsters. :)

I think that the O.A.T's, as you put them, are involved in decision-making, at some companies/some radio stations. But in others, and sadly, the majority of them, upper mgmt makes decisions sín consultation.

As far as "big radio" influence goes, elaborate what your views are and what you would like done. As, IMO, the problems lie with the corporations that own the stations, not the FCC so to speak (although, yes, you can counter with the Deregulation/Regulation debacle, to which I agree with).

After just two years of doing all this, I too, still look forward to going on-air. But it's changing.
 
Jumpin Joe...see what happens when you buzz the tower? That would be Roadmasters in San Antonio - or Truckmasters if you're in So. Cal.

As for MorningTFXDude - I agree, an extremely well thought post.

As for the rest, there is very little we can do...


WE/US AS THE TALENT WE NEED TO GET POLITICALLY INVOLVED

How is this going to make a difference? Politics are all around us, and with the lobbyists, there is very little we, as a whole, can do, let alone on our own. Getting involved is always a good, and we should become involved, but doing so isnt going to allow any changes.

WE NEED TO PAY ATTENTION TO WHEN THE RULES ARE ABOUT TO BE CHANGED

We do pay attention when there are changes, but with the state of the FCC, we don't have much say so in what happens. This, of course, has to do with appointments by whatever the current administration is. Look at their recent rulings and tell me there isn't a political bent.

WHEN THE BIG ONES TRY TO BUY THEIR WAY WITH THEIR CONGRESSMAN THRU DONATIONS

There are always going to be lobbyists and favors that are sought, behind closed doors, either directly or indirectly, or above board or not.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH WE NEED TO CREATE SOME TYPE OF REPRESENTATION THAT IS IN THE INTEREST OF REAL RADIO & US AND OF COURSE IT NEEDS TO BE CLEAR TO EVERYONE WHAT WE STAND FOR

How do we do this? If you think about it, there are ego's in every career on the planet, and more so in radio. Do you think that the ego's in radio can agree on one course of action?

NO VOICE TRACKING

This is going to happen - with the state of radio being what it is, this is a change, or rather, now the rule that was once an exception, that is going to continue.

1 SINDICATED SHOW PER RADIO STATION

Syndicated shows have become a way of life - regardless of format - that are indeed entertaining - that's why they are on the air.

NO BLACK BALLING OF ON AIR TALENTS

Have you forgotten that working in the radio business is a relatively small world - someone always knows someone that has worked in the various markets, and word spreads. For those talents that have gotten into it with either management or staff, and were terminated, the word, although not official, so to speak, gets out there. So, yes, a form of black balling will always take place.

NO ILLEGALS WORKING WITH FAKE DOCUMENTS AT RADIO STATIONS

I refer to MorningTFXDude's comments.

ALL STATIONS SHOULD HAVE AN OVERNIGHT JOCK LIVE PER STATION

While I agree that it should be this way - again, it's a money factor, and will continue in it's current form.

TALK RADIO SHOULD NOT ONLY BE LIBERAL OR ONE SIDED IT SHOULD BE PROGRAMMED WITH A PRO & A CON SO WE CAN GET BOTH SIDES OF THE STORY

If you want both sides of the story, research it. The problem here, for lack of a better word, is that whatever is on the air must be entertaining. With that said, we all know it becomes a ratings issue. Secondly, we also know that it becomes an issue with the advertisers - if the advertisers don't agree with a certain point of view - they'll pull their advertising and place it somewhere else.

THE FCC COMMISIONER SHOULD BE ELECTED BY BROADCASTERS AND SHOULD HAVE HAD ENOUGH EXPERIENCE IN BOTH MANAGEMENT AND ON AIR TO BE ELECTED

Remember, there are five commissioners, and they're all appointed. So, what you're saying is that we would elect all five comissioners? This would take an act of congress - and I don't see that happening anytime soon. Additionally, anytime you get involved with having to "elect" someone you will see lobbyists, or people pushing their agenda's, getting involved.

Next?........
 
Okay...Metro's chopper is not up again this morning with KHOU using transtar camera shots - must be they've grounded it as a cost cutting measure, which leaves channel 13 as the only TV station with a bird in the air...for those folks at Houston Metro, get those resume's ready if you haven't already, as this doesn't bode well.
 
Traffic dot Com has its airborne back up now. Smelling blood and going in for the kill of Metro. Serves them right, going Cheap Channel, and throwing deck chairs to save the ship. You dont win by cutting. You win by growing. How do you do traffic without people? Idiots.

Its too bad, because until now the product was competitive and made both services better, as good competition tends to do. I know a lot of good friends/ good people in both buildings, even in mgmt, but this is yet another death-gasp for radio.

Ted Wallace is out too. Probably the smartest guy in the world. Needs to change his politics--hahaha...
Ted is the best asset you can get in the Houston traffic biz.

Joe, Vik, Kevin, this is bull****. You wont be home long, I'm guessing. Give me a shout.

btw, I hear The company across the street is GROWING and hiring PEOPLE.
 
its time w (your name) said:
Ted Wallace is out too. Probably the smartest guy in the world. Needs to change his politics--hahaha...
Ted is the best asset you can get in the Houston traffic biz.

btw, I hear The company across the street is GROWING and hiring PEOPLE.

Ha! :D I love Ted. yes...his politics are...very interesting. :)

As far as 'the company across the street' - no hiring currently going on.
They are growing yes, but if you're an ex-Metro'ee, and want to switch over to Traffic.com, now won't be the ideal time.


Saying I heard one time from a wise old radio guy in mgmt said, "We hire great people, not many people"
 
I just got home from beating the streets for the day - very interesting to say the least. I had lunch with a friend of mine, who told me about Ted being canned - he was there for 14 years - that just sucks.

As for Total Traffic - aka traffic.com - I am told that JR has been contacted by several former Metro staffers - but I have no idea if he has any openings or if he is hiring.

What a loss for the Houston area with all those people being cut.
 
My bad - I was thinking something else when I wrote the above post - sorry. In other items, I also understand that Roy? will be producing, for lack of a better term, at Transtar, and that there will not be anyone at the metro offices than those few staffers doing traffic updates.

There are other rumors I've heard, but I'll hold them to myself for the time being until I can find verifiable sources - but I can say this, if they are true, then there will be nothing but echoes heard from the metro houston office.
 
radioguyintexas said:
Okay...Metro's chopper is not up again this morning with KHOU using transtar camera shots - must be they've grounded it as a cost cutting measure, which leaves channel 13 as the only TV station with a bird in the air...

Don Armstrong does live traffic reports from the FOX 26 chopper in the mornings.
 
I must admit that the technology, engineering, and political ends of the business are out of my league. I never had contact with them when I was in the game XX years ago. But I have to admit that the use of the "U" word scared Hell out of people then, and it obviously still does. I'm not suggesting such a thing, I'm just saying that when the word is used, it draws more attention than the annual SI Swimsuit Issue.
I am now in education, and the same is true in that field as well. Let me tell a brief story:
25 years ago (or so), my school had a new teacher who had just arrived from Chicago. At the end of our first faculty meeting, the Principal asked if there were any questions before we went to our rooms to get them ready for the start of the school year. The new guy raised his hand and asked who the building steward was. You could hear an audible gasp and the Principal said he would answer that in his office after the meeting. The teacher, a good one, I might add, resigned over the Christmas Holidays.
If there is such fear over unionization and the retribution that might follow, then unionization is exactly what is needed. Don't get me wrong. I am not a big advocate of unions. But, Geez Louise, if all we fear is fear (spelled B-O-S-S) itself, we (meaning society as a whole) are in deep trouble.
 
Regarding the "U" word

Yes it's true that people in Texas are afraid of unions because of what they know for an absolute fact that retribution will come and they'll probably end up looking for another job. Employees of a business can apply to the NLRB for a vote on unionizing, and employers are not supposed to do anything to stop it or interfere with it, but the reality is that many will.

Surely you know this, but in case you've forgotten, Texas is a Right to Work state. Section 14-B of the 1947 Taft-Hartley Act allows states to pass laws that outlaw the "closed shop," which requires union membership. You can get the job without joining the union, but you have to join within 30 days to keep the job. State laws that prohibit that practice are called Right to Work Laws.

Under the "open shop" rule, which applies here in Texas, an employee cannot be compelled to join or pay the equivalent of dues to a union, nor can the employee be fired if he or she joins the union. In other words, the employee has the "right to work," regardless of whether he or she is a member or financial contributor to such a union.

Without the power to require membership, people who work in a place that has a union are free to ignore it and the union can't do a thing about it. That's why unions have no strength in Texas. They're impotent. 22 states -- including Texas -- have a Right to Work law. 28 states don't. Guess which states have strong unions.

I believe unions would definitely improve salaries and working conditions for Texas broadcasters, but it ain't gonna happen in Texas. You also won't be surprised to know that ever since 1948, the Democratic Party's national platform has included a plank calling for repeal of the Taft Hartley Act. I haven't read this year's platform yet but I'm betting it's in there.
 
Well, well, well....I found a posting today that is quite interesting...it's on allaccess seeking t&r's for open positions at metro houston...yes, the ad indicates that it's for part time - but really, look at this, what is happening here is that metro cans all their full time staff, and now they're going to be looking for part timers to do what was the staffers former full time gigs....
 
"I believe unions would definitely improve salaries and working conditions for Texas broadcasters, but it ain't gonna happen in Texas."

Such forced changes in the economies of stations affected would actually result in FEWER jobs because the increased expense of employees would force stations to either pare staff back or shut down. Which of you is going to volunteer to be first in line to give up your gig so that someone else can be paid a higher, union-mandated wage?
 
Brent Clanton said:
"I believe unions would definitely improve salaries and working conditions for Texas broadcasters, but it ain't gonna happen in Texas."

Such forced changes in the economies of stations affected would actually result in FEWER jobs because the increased expense of employees would force stations to either pare staff back or shut down. Which of you is going to volunteer to be first in line to give up your gig so that someone else can be paid a higher, union-mandated wage?

Ah, yes, the threat of fewer jobs. Because, you know, none of us have ever been the only person at a five-station building, babysitting four terminals filled with voice tracks from Lufkin. How much paring back does a station need to do before it finally has to admit to itself that it needs to shut down? None of those stations are actually losing money, they're just not spending the profits on staff.

These are the same threats used to dissuade people from backing pro-localism legislature, by the way. How in the world do stations in AFTRA states make a profit without paring back on staff or shutting down?Somebody needs to call those 28 states and tell them it can't be done.
 
It is WE the customers

How in the world do stations in AFTRA states make a profit without paring back on staff or shutting down?

They make money the only way left to them by the market conditions they have to live with. By charging advertising rates that cover their overhead and make them a profit. Their advertisers have to pay those rates to be on the air, and pass those costs back to their customers in the form of higher prices for their goods and services.

It's the way the marketplace works.
 
Re: It is WE the customers

FilioScotia said:
How in the world do stations in AFTRA states make a profit without paring back on staff or shutting down?

They make money the only way left to them by the market conditions they have to live with. By charging advertising rates that cover their overhead and make them a profit. Their advertisers have to pay those rates to be on the air, and pass those costs back to their customers in the form of higher prices for their goods and services.

It's the way the marketplace works.

Hey, isn't that the pre-consolidation business model?
 
It's another bad day on wall street, with stocks tumbling everywhere, including broadcast companies. Looking at WW1, their stock is down again. Looking at it just as a business, I can understand all the staff cuts at metro across the country - just six months ago, WW1 was trading above $2 a share - and now it's at 38.8 cents a share.

However, it still is difficult to see so many radio people out of work in broadcasting - yes, it's a business, but people running the business are not radio people - here's the bio for Westwood's CEO:

Thomas Beusse has been a director of the Company since January 1, 2008, when he was named President and CEO of the Company. Mr. Beusse served as the President of Time4 Media from January 2006 to March 2007 at which time the division was sold by Time Inc. From March 2001 to October 2005, he held various positions at Rodale, Inc., ranging from Senior Vice President of Rodale Sports Group (March 2001 to November 2001) to President Men’s Health/Sports Content Group (December 2001 to December 2004) and President of Magazine Publishing until October 2005.


Any thoughts??????
 
rocknrollisdead said:
Kevinc said:
The other two layoffs included Gail DeLaughter and me, Kevin Charles. I am still working at 1075 the new Khits. Middays 10-3

Kevinc

Sorry, Kev. :-[

Thanks.... I'm doing ok and enjoying sleeping in for a while. I hear that I am in good company though. I was one of several good people let go from the local Metro offices, but I understand that the news bureau chiefs in all Metro markets were let go along with many other long time traffic and news reporters around the country... I have no hard feelings though. I'll move on to something else when the Good Lord says its time. and for all I know, he may have already been saying something to me and I just haven't been listening.

KC
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom