radio-locator.comAnyone has a list of FM stations in Connecticut?
I would not trust any listing of anything on user-modifiable Wikipedia.Might also try Wikipedia under Radio in Connecticut. List claims to be accurate as of 9/22. But also includes AM but also claims to be sortable.
Radio-Locator's maps are unreliable, and its streaming links sometimes lead nowhere. Better than Wikipedia in that the operators of the site depend on users to feed it updated info in some cases, but don't allow those users to directly modify the website.Try "Radio Locator" they list by state or by town and (FM first, them AM) and they have the output power, wether they stream or not and coverage maps (day and night for AM stations)
FCCData.org (REC) is a MUCH better resource than R-L. Looks cleaner, has more details and won’t threaten your device with viruses. Haven’t used R-L in at least 15 years.Try "Radio Locator" they list by state or by town and (FM first, them AM) and they have the output power, wether they stream or not and coverage maps (day and night for AM stations)
fccdata.org is RECDave the administrator here hooked me up with "REC" much better than R-L the FCCData.org sounds like the Government, but I might look into it.
Even if you don't generally trust the government, the data available from the FCC is benign. There's no reason for the FCC to try to deceive you about call letters and signal patterns -- although I'm sure if your tinfoil hat is on tight enough you'll be able to dream up a reason that it would!Dave the administrator here hooked me up with "REC" much better than R-L the FCCData.org sounds like the Government, but I might look into it.
As I seem to be doing more often than ever, Wikipedia has very inaccurate radio information in general. It may be a good place to start, but it's not a definitive source.Might also try Wikipedia under Radio in Connecticut. List claims to be accurate as of 9/22. But also includes AM but also claims to be sortable.
Correct. REC has multiple data collections, and the fccdata.org one is much better than radio-locator and infinitely more accurate than Wikipedia.fccdata.org is REC
If you're going to give sarcastic answers to my posts, I'd rather you keep your colorful opinions to yourselfEven if you don't generally trust the government, the data available from the FCC is benign. There's no reason for the FCC to try to deceive you about call letters and signal patterns -- although I'm sure if your tinfoil hat is on tight enough you'll be able to dream up a reason that it would!
Although you're probably busy enough maintaining your site as well as moderating this discussion board, have you considered becoming a Wikipedia editor?As I seem to be doing more often than ever, Wikipedia has very inaccurate radio information in general. It may be a good place to start, but it's not a definitive source.
While his response was sarcastic, I can see how your post could imply that you have some trust issues with the government. However, the "government" is THE definitive data source for all of this information as the FCC administers and regulates broadcast licenses.If you're going to give sarcastic answers to my posts, I'd rather you keep your colorful opinions to yourself