BobOnTheJob said:
I was in Denver recently & was wondering if I might experience that to the east on I-70. Having not checked the elevation east of town, I had this vision of being 100 miles out & seeing mountains in the distance (like you can see Humphrey's peak 100 miles east of Flagstaff on I-40). That wasn't the case, at least on a cloudy/snowy day.
You know Bob, I've tried that - at least headed east on I-70 and found that the Denver and Colorado Springs stations die out less than 80 miles from their transmitters - and fade in and out sooner than that. That may sound far, but you can get Denver FMs from Raton Pass - over 160 miles distant and Colorado Springs FMs are capable of going even farther from Cheyenne Mountain. So, I found it to be disappointing but somewhat educational. Best long-range reception of those stations is along the Front Range; particularly along those occasional east-west ridges that protrude from the Rockies.
The trouble going east is that the terrain gradually slopes downward (yes, there are hills - but the overall topography is downward). So, the FM signals pass over your head. This reminds me of the situation with Pocatello and Idaho Falls, Idaho. They're about 50 miles apart in the Snake River Plain and Idaho Falls ends up being several hundred feet higher in altitude. The Idaho Falls FM signals do not get into Pocatello well (despite being higher up) while the Pocatello FMs are like locals in the Falls. Better line of sight being at a higher altitude looking at the lower altitude transmitter site.
It seems even odder if you go there because Idaho Falls is in the middle of a flat plain while Pokey is ringed by mountains to the south and east (so it would seem higher in elevation). Those mountains do not block Pocatello from reception of Idaho Falls stations by the way - it's to the north.