e-dawg said:Now 106.9 is Classic Hits. Now were are down to 3 format holes.
1. CHR-POP
2. Oldies
3. Adult Standard
or
4. Contempoary Christian Music.
BossRadioDJ said:e-dawg said:Now 106.9 is Classic Hits. Now were are down to 3 format holes.
1. CHR-POP
2. Oldies
3. Adult Standard
or
4. Contempoary Christian Music.
Forget true Oldies (Fifties and Sixties variety) in the Bay Area ... unless the KOMY/1340 programming is moved to KSCO/1080, which *should* be audible up the Peninsula to San Francisco and over in the Eastbay.
CHR/Pop? MOViN 99.7 might be leaning that way...
Adult Standards? The best (or worst, depending on your POV) you might get is an Internet revival of KABL, which is currently in the works. On the air locally? Not bloody likely in the near future.
Contemporary Christian? I'll defer to someone else on that format. Or maybe Harold Camping will flip KEAR/610...
Nah.
DJ
well look at how long Alice has been failing and it is still thereasstprince said:I can sort of see Moving trying to fill CHR-POP, but I think they are failing and it is just matters of time that Moving will be history.
Contemporary Christian Music.... It would be an interesting format hole to fill, since we have K-Love and Air One and both of them seems to be doing alright.
XCountry285 said:CHR-Pop is a very big hole to fill. But, it could happen if Wild 94.9 would tweak itself to add more rock and pop songs on it's charts and a lot less hip hop so it's balanced.
paulsecic said:KABL is coming back? CC? Nah, they dumped it in January.
Marv-L.A. said:Would a CHR/Pop station get any better 12-17 or 18-34 numbers than either KYLD or KMEL? Most of the CHR/Pop stations in our twenty largest cities have superb 18-34 numbers but certainly aren't mass-appeal powerhouses that the format used to be loaded with from coast to coast.
It didn't fail, it was really Bonneville's fault, they flipped it when hip hop was going to chrpappy97 said:Marv-L.A. said:Would a CHR/Pop station get any better 12-17 or 18-34 numbers than either KYLD or KMEL? Most of the CHR/Pop stations in our twenty largest cities have superb 18-34 numbers but certainly aren't mass-appeal powerhouses that the format used to be loaded with from coast to coast.
Why did Z95.7 fail in the Bay Area in the late 90's? I really enjoyed their CHR/POP format.
I know in the Fremont area 89.3 KOHL does CHR/POP format, but many believe it has gone downhill in the last decade. I for one am surprised we don't have a CHR/POP station covering the entire SF Bay Area (or most of it).
Other markets don't have nearly as many hip hop/urban or alt/rock stations in favor of CHR/POP stations (some that lean towards hip hop, and others than lean towards alt, but with substantial overlap).
sfradio said:It didn't fail, it was really Bonneville's fault, they flipped it when hip hop was going to chrpappy97 said:Marv-L.A. said:Would a CHR/Pop station get any better 12-17 or 18-34 numbers than either KYLD or KMEL? Most of the CHR/Pop stations in our twenty largest cities have superb 18-34 numbers but certainly aren't mass-appeal powerhouses that the format used to be loaded with from coast to coast.
Why did Z95.7 fail in the Bay Area in the late 90's? I really enjoyed their CHR/POP format.
I know in the Fremont area 89.3 KOHL does CHR/POP format, but many believe it has gone downhill in the last decade. I for one am surprised we don't have a CHR/POP station covering the entire SF Bay Area (or most of it).
Other markets don't have nearly as many hip hop/urban or alt/rock stations in favor of CHR/POP stations (some that lean towards hip hop, and others than lean towards alt, but with substantial overlap).
12 yr olds and 40 year olds didn't have a lot of choices on the radio back in the 60s.Marv-L.A. said:Twelve year olds AND 40 year old olds had NO problem listening to top 40 radio throughout the sixties, seventies & eighties before CHR/Pop stations narrowed their target audiences beginning in the very late eighties in an attempt to do battle with CHR/Rhythmic stations who'd swiped TONS of their teen audiences.
CHRles said:sfradio said:It didn't fail, it was really Bonneville's fault, they flipped it when hip hop was going to chrpappy97 said:Marv-L.A. said:Would a CHR/Pop station get any better 12-17 or 18-34 numbers than either KYLD or KMEL? Most of the CHR/Pop stations in our twenty largest cities have superb 18-34 numbers but certainly aren't mass-appeal powerhouses that the format used to be loaded with from coast to coast.
Why did Z95.7 fail in the Bay Area in the late 90's? I really enjoyed their CHR/POP format.
I know in the Fremont area 89.3 KOHL does CHR/POP format, but many believe it has gone downhill in the last decade. I for one am surprised we don't have a CHR/POP station covering the entire SF Bay Area (or most of it).
Other markets don't have nearly as many hip hop/urban or alt/rock stations in favor of CHR/POP stations (some that lean towards hip hop, and others than lean towards alt, but with substantial overlap).
Bingo! Z-95.7's CHR sound was pretty much the most successful format on 95.7 in years. Bonneville with their uber-conservative mindset had trouble doing CHR when Hip Hop was all the rage on the format.
Bonneville with their uber-conservative mindset had trouble doing CHR when Hip Hop was all the rage on the format.