• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Fox 103.1 & 96.7

G

GForce

Guest
This station never ceases to amaze me ...

1) Why would they put their overnite jock (Mike Coleman) on Saturday and Sunday nites, as opposed to Friday and Saturday overnites? There's definitely more people listening late Friday than on Sunday.

2) When they first merged the signals, Bob O did mornings from 5 to 10 am on both signals. Then they split the morning show on the 2 signals between Bob O and Joe Mangless. Bob still did 5 to 10 am, yet Joe started one hour later from 6 to 10 am. Then without any notice to the listeners, all of a sudden they're back to just Bob O. Furthermore, they cut him back 2 hours since now (according to their website) he's on only from 6 to 9 am.

What is wrong with the owners? Do you think they'll ever get things right?

Just curious.
 
> This station never ceases to amaze me ...
>
> 1) Why would they put their overnite jock (Mike Coleman) on
> Saturday and Sunday nites, as opposed to Friday and Saturday
> overnites? There's definitely more people listening late
> Friday than on Sunday.
>
> 2) When they first merged the signals, Bob O did mornings
> from 5 to 10 am on both signals. Then they split the morning
> show on the 2 signals between Bob O and Joe Mangless. Bob
> still did 5 to 10 am, yet Joe started one hour later from 6
> to 10 am. Then without any notice to the listeners, all of a
> sudden they're back to just Bob O. Furthermore, they cut
> him back 2 hours since now (according to their website) he's
> on only from 6 to 9 am.
>
> What is wrong with the owners? Do you think they'll ever
> get things right?
>
> Just curious.
>


Fox had a good run up in their numbers after the merge, then dipped again in latest. It appears panic set in and its time for more of a shuffle. I like Coleman, they could use more of him. Bob O is more down to earth so I dont mind Joe back to AM. It'll be interesting to see what happens from here.
 
> This station never ceases to amaze me ...
>
> 1) Why would they put their overnite jock (Mike Coleman) on
> Saturday and Sunday nites, as opposed to Friday and Saturday
> overnites? There's definitely more people listening late
> Friday than on Sunday.
>
> 2) When they first merged the signals, Bob O did mornings
> from 5 to 10 am on both signals. Then they split the morning
> show on the 2 signals between Bob O and Joe Mangless. Bob
> still did 5 to 10 am, yet Joe started one hour later from 6
> to 10 am. Then without any notice to the listeners, all of a
> sudden they're back to just Bob O. Furthermore, they cut
> him back 2 hours since now (according to their website) he's
> on only from 6 to 9 am.
>
> What is wrong with the owners? Do you think they'll ever
> get things right?
>
> Just curious.
>

No. I think there should be new owners, someone who knows how to run a station.

Speaking of the Fox, I've heard them on 93.7 and 106.9 FM.
 
So you like Mike Coleman, huh? Not only does he sound like an idiot on the air 95% of the time, he is also a racist and a homophobe... check out his myspace page where he refers to Usher as a "monkey" and says he hates monkeys!!

Maybe his bosses at Fox should see this irresponsible crap written by one of their own.

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?f...&MyToken=c5bf3c54-720c-4dba-9aae-7d3e99bcc5e9


> > This station never ceases to amaze me ...
> >
> > 1) Why would they put their overnite jock (Mike Coleman)
> on
> > Saturday and Sunday nites, as opposed to Friday and
> Saturday
> > overnites? There's definitely more people listening late
> > Friday than on Sunday.
> >
> > 2) When they first merged the signals, Bob O did mornings
> > from 5 to 10 am on both signals. Then they split the
> morning
> > show on the 2 signals between Bob O and Joe Mangless. Bob
> > still did 5 to 10 am, yet Joe started one hour later from
> 6
> > to 10 am. Then without any notice to the listeners, all of
> a
> > sudden they're back to just Bob O. Furthermore, they cut
> > him back 2 hours since now (according to their website)
> he's
> > on only from 6 to 9 am.
> >
> > What is wrong with the owners? Do you think they'll ever
> > get things right?
> >
> > Just curious.
> >
>
>
> Fox had a good run up in their numbers after the merge, then
> dipped again in latest. It appears panic set in and its time
> for more of a shuffle. I like Coleman, they could use more
> of him. Bob O is more down to earth so I dont mind Joe back
> to AM. It'll be interesting to see what happens from here.
>
 
> So you like Mike Coleman, huh? Not only does he sound like
> an idiot on the air 95% of the time, he is also a racist and
> a homophobe... check out his myspace page where he refers to
> Usher as a "monkey" and says he hates monkeys!!
>
> Maybe his bosses at Fox should see this irresponsible crap
> written by one of their own.
>
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=1658382&> blogID=63438366&MyToken=c5bf3c54-720c-4dba-9aae-7d3e99bcc5e9
>


The fact that you hunted down someone's myspace is in itself, creepy, nevermind trying to use some stupid social site as a basis for an argument. Id be much more concearned if he was stating any of that publicly, which I havent heard.
 
> So you like Mike Coleman, huh? Not only does he sound like
> an idiot on the air 95% of the time, he is also a racist and
> a homophobe... check out his myspace page where he refers to
> Usher as a "monkey" and says he hates monkeys!!
>
> Maybe his bosses at Fox should see this irresponsible crap
> written by one of their own.
>
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=1658382&> blogID=63438366&MyToken=c5bf3c54-720c-4dba-9aae-7d3e99bcc5e9

Strange that you searched for his my space.

Are you just jealous that he at least has a job in radio and you don't?

<P ID="signature">______________
radiolover78</P>
 
welcome to 2006

>
> The fact that you hunted down someone's myspace is in
> itself, creepy, nevermind trying to use some stupid social
> site as a basis for an argument.

its a HUGE social site - been readin the news, or just this board?

Id be much more concearned
> if he was stating any of that publicly, which I havent
> heard.
>
it IS public - more people will see it on myspace than if he put it in the paper
 
Re: welcome to 2006

> >
> > The fact that you hunted down someone's myspace is in
> > itself, creepy, nevermind trying to use some stupid social
>
> > site as a basis for an argument.
>
> its a HUGE social site - been readin the news, or just this
> board?
>
> Id be much more concearned
> > if he was stating any of that publicly, which I havent
> > heard.
> >
> it IS public - more people will see it on myspace than if he
> put it in the paper
>

You are missing the point. I know Myspace is huge, it's In the top 10 traffic sites. However, Charging someone as a racist is serious. To use one comment on a self embelshing social site which is mostly made up of 15-21 year olds as the foundation for accusing someone of that seems a little weak. Why isnt the question raised about why anyone would stalk someone in such detail to be that quick to find such a remark? that's more disturbing. What's next, stalking instant message or phone conversations? Cmon.
 
Re: welcome to 2006

> it IS public - more people will see it on myspace than if he
> put it in the paper

He's talking about publicy saying the things Mike Coleman has been accused of saying ON THE RADIO.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom