It is amazing how both the professional press as well as the people on message boards are running to herald Fox's supposed dumping of Glenn Beck.
While his detractors would love to say his decreased viewership is the reason, it isn't. True, Glenn's numbers have fallen from his peak, but do you think that perhaps the same is happening to most news-oriented broadcasts? Despite the budgetary and union quarrels, we're still in the midpoint lull of an election cycle.
Glenn's numbers are still way ahead of his time-slot competitors at CNN and MSNBC. Way ahead. Check MediaBistro/TVNewser.
It's been a long time since some bigger advertisers dropped him. If Fox couldn't sell the show, he would have been off the air a year ago.
I'm guessing he's just flat out tired of the schedule. It's hard to do a three hour radio show in the mid-morning, and wait until 5:00 p.m. to do a live TV show. (Glenn's HLN show aired at 8:00 p.m. but taped at 3:00 p.m.) I also speculate that health issues he's been having with his eyes is probably limiting what he can do workwise.
And besides, he's pretty much proven he can successfully keep an audience at an hour that usually isn't conducive to that. He doesn't need to prove it anymore. I'm guessing he just feels like "he's done."