• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Fox News Reports: "Radio Is Dead, Is iTunes Next?"

MattParker said:
TVradioguru said:
Don't want an IPhone because you want to have 'open source' options? Great! Don't buy one. But calling Steve Jobs a Tech Nazi because they go a certain direction, is rather childish and over the top.

I don't think so. Nothing new. The same arguments were when AOL tried to keep people nice and safe and not exposed to the dangers of the big bad Internet. Steve Jobs deserves the title (borrowed from the owner of soup restaurant on Seinfeld) because of his high-handed tactics in restricting access to apps. What is unjustified are your untrue slurs against the Android operating system. I have no objection is Steve Jobs wants to run a selective app store. What I object to is running closed-shop app store while not allowing users to explore other options if they want to. The guy is a control freak with no regard for anyone or anything but himself - going back to his refusal to allow designers to put a fan in the original Mac, which offended his aesthetic sensibilities, but would have kept the systems from over-heating and breaking down. His treatment of Woz, the true genius behind Apple, was reprehensible.

Are you still arguing that Jobs doesn't serve his consumers? Because you have yet to make that point. So what if he is controls every aspect of his design and production? That's his prerogative. If you don't like it, don't buy his products. But you can't deny that millions don't agree with you, or even care. It's obvious you hate Apple, but you have yet to prove why "Apple doesn't give the consumer what he wants," despite making that assertion.

This is also the problem with radio. We're all nerds about this stuff, so we make sweeping generalizations about how the audience cares about things we care about. They don't.
 
MattParker said:
His treatment of Woz, the true genius behind Apple, was reprehensible.

Funny, I spoke with Woz recently. We're both Apple stockholders. He holds no grudge against Jobs. Neither do I.
 
From my perspective, Fox is "that funny little network that managed to get some pipsqueak UHF" TV signals a few years back.
Apple is that "other" lind of computers that has that "funny hidden file structure and spends half its power on hiding its function from the user".

Music "access portals" like itunes or Pandora are born dead, as far I'm concerned.
At every age I've ever been, and I'm now 49 it's ALWAYS been about the marketing and SELLING me something
that has been "picked" for me to like.

I STILL don't need this function. I need the music industry to make a greater selection of music more available, and
provide the hassle-free and secure feeling that comes from buying a product on media proven reliable over many decades.

A purchased piece of vinyl never takes over part of your bandwidth or tries overtly to drag you to some particular location
for more music purchases and "analysis" of your habits.

My every fleeting brush with itunes has been annoying to the extreme.
I've been far too involved in my own music procurement and management over the years to pay some company to
pretend it's looking out for my interests. :D

Too much like what it would be if organized crime were running the only record shop which somehow miraculously stayed in existence. Even if it HAD what I wanted, I'd find some other way to get it. And if I DID have to purchase
"audio" I would use an Apple device to play the file, re-record the audio into a new file, obtaining a "cleaned" mp3 file,
that would not drag along a mountain of data and associations intended to support a particular marketer of audio
and "audio systems", that don't even incorporate radios into them.

Maybe if Apple had become the one computer company that found a way to make AM radio work IN a computer,
I'd have a completely different opinion.
 
The answer is right here: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/pandora-to-raise-as-much-as-100-mln-in-ipo-2011-02-11 and I quote, "Pandora said it generated $90 million in revenue during the nine months ending Oct. 31; it had a net loss of $328,000 in the period. The net loss applicable to common stockholders of the company was $7.1 million, according to the filing."

How many years being in business does it take to make a profit and they still have gotten there? Well, the answer is they will never make a profit paying internet royalties!!!
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom